Anatole Kaletsky
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
When Alistair Darling said that Britain’s economic conditions were “arguably the worst they have been for 60 years”, the initial reaction from the Opposition and media was either to compliment the Chancellor for his “frankness” or to gloat about the way he had “let the cat out of the bag” and thereby embarrassed Gordon Brown.
This was understandable, because Mr Darling is indeed an unusually straightforward politician, respected and liked by journalists and politicians across the political spectrum. On closer inspection, the Chancellor’s reputation for frankness makes his political blunder worse, since it reveals a flaw more serious than deviousness: basic ignorance of economic facts and figures. This is a failing that the minister responsible for national finances can never live down.
Were there any interpretation of Mr Darling’s comments that tallied with either economic statistics or the realities of British life – or if the Treasury had rushed out a correction, explaining that he had been misquoted or hadn’t meant what he said – this episode might have been forgotten as just another stumble by an accident-prone Government. But sadly for Mr Darling, though luckily for the British economy, there is no way of massaging the facts and figures to make his statement even half-right.
The most obvious contrasts – today’s 5 per cent inflation and 5.4 per cent unemployment may feel uncomfortable, but these are just tiny ripples compared with the tidal waves of economic hardship – the 27 per cent inflation and 12 per cent unemployment – that hit Britain in the 1970s and 1980s.
A similar conclusion comes from almost any other economic indicator: gross domestic product, personal incomes, government finances, employment growth, repossessions. Only house prices are falling faster than ever before – because they were far higher when this downturn began. And despite all the headlines about a credit crunch, financial conditions are also relatively benign. Homeowners and estate agents may complain about a “mortgage crisis”, because banks charge over 6 per cent for a mortgage and require a 10 per cent deposit from first-time buyers, but in the 1970s and 1980s, mortgage rates repeatedly reached 15 per cent and borrowers typically had to save up deposits of 25 per cent or more.
Social and political conditions are now incomparably better than they were 30 years ago. This can be attested by anyone who recalls the three-day weeks and winters of discontent, the petrol rationing and power cuts, the dole queues and miners’ strikes, the credit squeezes and currency restrictions of those days. And other social indicators – child poverty, life expectancy, housing conditions, educational qualifications, pension levels, living standards relative to other countries – are almost all far better today than they were in the 1970s and 1980s, despite the understandable feeling that many of these conditions should be much better, considering the huge tax burdens successive governments have imposed.
What on earth, then, was Mr Darling talking about when he described the present economic crisis as the worst since 1948? The Treasury lamely suggested over the weekend that the Chancellor was not really referring to Britain, but to the world economy as a whole. This “clarification”, however, does not get Mr Darling off the hook. The US has not yet suffered a recession – much less the once in a lifetime depression predicted widely a few months ago – and only last Friday announced a stark upgrade in its GDP figures.
The European economy is slowing and it may well sink into a mild recession – but, this has not happened yet. Developing countries are still growing strongly and even the global banking system, despite all the hysteria, has so far suffered smaller losses in relation to its total capital than it did in the Third World debt crisis of the 1980s.
In short, it is literally impossible to tally Mr Darling’s comments with anything that has happened to the British and international economies so far. Could it be, however, that he meant to offer a forecast? Predictions are, by their nature, a matter of opinion, which means that Mr Darling’s comments, if they refer to the future, cannot be refuted by objective statistical evidence even though there is now no respectable economic model pointing to anything like the apocalyptic conditions Mr Darling described.
Suppose, then, that the Treasury decides to spin his comments not as a description of what has already happened but as a prediction that Britain will suffer its worst economic crisis since 1948 in the year or two ahead. If this was what Mr Darling meant, will anybody believe any economic forecast he presents in his next Budget if this is less than catastrophic? And if Mr Darling does present a catastrophic forecast in a preelection Budget, what will this do to Gordon Brown’s chances of survival? These questions can yield only one answer: the next Budget will be presented by a new chancellor.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Looks like Darlıng was rıght.....
Michael, Manchester,
Mr Kaletsky ... I think you need to look at how statistics are calculated, and how these basis have been altered substantially since the 1970s. Then, and only then, can you properly gauge that the stats we have now are LIES.
Please refer to August issues of The Economist for the homogenised stats
Ana, Lytham, UK
There is nothing Mr.Darling can do,when confidence goes ,fear is not far behind, but like all downturns they end eventually, although many will suffer hardship,it is one of life's realities, I should know I have had my share.the only defence is stoicism. fall down 7 times get up 8 (chines proverb)
Eddy, Bury St.Edmunds,
I love it when Kaletsky makes statements that I totally dissagree with. Now even more confident that I am right. The central banking system is running out of liquidity to lubricate the system. This was in your own paper yesterday.
Be afraid..be very affraid.
Brian Anderson, Edinburgh,
Has it occurred to Mr Kaletsky that the Chancellor might have access to more data than he does?
Sterence, Oxford,
On the day Kaletsky's article appeared in The Times suggesting things werent so bad and inflation is only 5%, the paper put its price up by about 15%. Who are we to believe?
Daniel Austin, London,
If you suddenly remove a huge amount of the money circulating in a economy it is bound to result in large unemployment. Do not forget that other countries are having similar problem so competition for exports is greater. The fall in the pound will help ex[porters. How far it will fall is a worry
Chris Stuart, Carentan, France
Don't worry. Evenwithout manufacturing, tangible exports and high levels of welfare claimants we'd be ok. Don't forget that we have the City of London, the world's financial centre.God knows what they export but they have served us well enabling us to borrow loads from theworld and that can't be bad
Shaun, Kingston,
The chancellor is right. We have a major crisis. A generation has has it too easy with cheap borrowing, large debts, throw-away products and too much leisure but not learned to save, make do or use its initiative to find a job or create new business. We cannot blame him or Gordon Brown but ourselves
Bill, Cockermouth, UK
So! all you optimists will of course be able to inform us of where the 'growth' is going to materialise from in the future now the ATM in the back garden is flashing out of use,and credit is a dirty word.
Your upbeat assumptions are nothing more than wishfull thinking I'm afraid.
antony Graham, southport, England
Journalists positively spinning the figures whilst the chancellor fesses up. Something's not right...
Tim, Brighton,
You forgot that the first priority of politicians is themselves. What Darling sees is no profits in the building industry, non in high street sales and no chance of extra taxes on the power companies. The "gloom" is that he will have no tax income. So it is the worst scene FOR HIM in 60 years - see?
Colin Davison, Leeds, UK
"5.4 per cent unemployment "?......where did that figure come from? Double it and add some and you may be getting there. 26% of the population of Iverpool alone live on benefits and benefits in my book equals unemployment by any other name.
judy, Liverpool, England
Anatole we are in fact as badly off as 60 years ago when we were forced to go cap in hand to the US and ask for the biggest loan in our history. Ironically we only just finished paying it back and 'Hey Ho' we are right back where we started but now owe even more. What a useless government.
D Case, Newquay,
Real unemployment, including those who want to work but who do not qualify for and are not receiving Jobseeker's Allowance, is well in excess of 20%. Brown achieves 5.6% unemployment through these means and the creation of millions of poorly paid part-time jobs. His gift for stealth knows no bounds.
Melchet, Edinburgh, UK
Why do we have a Solicitor running our Treasury? surely there must be some member of the Cabinet with financial training. Each Government departmeny should be lead by an expert who knows what they are doing. You wouldn't have a Butcher operating in a hospital would you?
Stone, Enger, Germany
It's funny to read Mr. Kaletsky's take on "basic ignorance of economic facts and figures." and its consequences when he overlooks the question Are any of the economic facts and figures actually calculated the same way they were 60 years ago? if not what are the results when you do?
Steve Elkins, Raleigh, USA
"Social and political conditions are now incomparably better than they were 30 years ago."
Absolutely disagree. I can remember the 70s as well as you K and with all the bad points you list life was still better then than now. Space restricts mentioning the good things and as for education. Really??
Steve, Chester,
I have long believed that most MP's are idiots and that includes all the present Government ministers. Darling's recent comments and Kaletsky's excellent article just confirms that. God help us all!
David Bennington, Ruislip, UK
Perhaps he meant to say we had the worst Chancellor for 60 years and now we have the worst PM for 60 years
SH, Leeds,
Mr. Kaletsky should know better than to trust pure statistics! Britain is an empire built out of credit, out of borrowing & buy-now-pay-later...our lives are hurried harrassment, goods cheaper, made in China, free time gone, mortgages ubiquitous - jobs are service work. Where is life quality?
Chris. Fulker, Jiji Township, Nantou County, Taiwan
You ain't seen nothing yet!
R James, Clifton, UK
The public services pension timebomb coupled with the average indebtedness of the general population will gradually strangle any feeling of euphoria over ensuing years!
This problem may be difficult to bear in mind but will gradually grind away at our feeling of well being and security.
Jim Golightly, Prudhoe, England
It just amazes me to think that columnists after columnists think Darling has overstated the case. 2 years back columnists compared UK economy to the one in 1990 and concluded that scenarios are different and house price fall if it happens will be shallow. In hindsight they were all completely wrong
vishal, Ilford,
It is true that mortgage rates once reached 15%, briefly I think during the ERM crisis, but we all had tax relief up to our highest rate. For example, for most people this reduced a 12% mortgage to a little over 8% - not much higher than today's average.
clive mills, Bromley, Kent
Darling has got it really wrong ,even the year( 60 years ) 1948 just after the 2nd World war when the whole world was living in poverty because of the war destruction. Mr Darling has to go , he seems to be a good solicitor but in economics he scores zero. He has caused so much damage HE MUST GO.
Nicholas, LARNACA, CYPRUS
think he got his cue-cards mixed up... he was supposed to save that comment for the discussion about the english national football team later in the day
vic, london,
Oddly, the collapse in the FTSI, Gordon Brown's cancelling of tax relief on pension dividends (current cost to the market £100 Billions and growing) and the public sector pensions' deficit of £1 Trillion (that's £1000,000,000,000) seem to have been conveniently ignored by Mr. Kaletsky.
Stephen Kenny, Heswall, England
Far from overstating the doomsday scenario for the UK economy, I think the chancellor has got it right, although it would have been better to keep stum. We as a nation have gorged ourselves on foreign goods on borrowed money. We have not created wealth to pay for them. Mr Micawber springs to mind.
dudley holley, Thorpe Bay, UK
As people refer to the dodgy dealings of the banks: the subprime loan crisis came about because lenders were forced by the US government to lend to people they wouldn't normally lend to. The only reaction was to repackage that debt to spread the eventual misery. The banks cheated each other.
James Gradisher, Worthing, England
I agree with Martin of Sheffield. My immediate first reaction was that Darling was overstating the scale of the problem so that the government could then claim the credit when things did not turn out as black as forecast. ;Thank you for confirming that; Mr Kaletsky.
Sheona Hutcheson, Chesham,
Since when did a ministers lack of qualified in an area of cabinet responsibility prevent them getting the position?
Daz, Basingstoke, England
Thanks Mr Koletsky.
Praise also to The Times for printing Land Registry figures showing house prices only fell 2% in the last year. Please now challenge equally overhyped tabloids and analysts who have forgotten their statistical training in citing unrepresentative Halifax & Nationwide indices
terry, harrogate,
M Wadhurst raises an important point about pensions. Let's not forget that there was a "baby boom" in 1946. Female pensioners born then have already hit retirement age, but the big bang will come in 2011. What is HM Government doing to prepare for the foreseeable and impending pensions crisis?
Edmund Burke, Kingston upon Thames, England
Whatever form of recession we are having, it is surely self-inflicted.
Blair/Browns lack of strategic thinking, coupled with the greed of a wunch of City Bankers and supine regulators have caused the damage. Loose credit, toxic financial instruments, commodity speculation and shorting stock.
Tim Black, Southampton, UK
Perhaps he meant we have the worst government for 60 years
bob holmes, axbridge , England
You have forgotten to mention the enormous burden of the the state and the fact that the state pension obligation is not on the goverment's books. Factor that in and things begin too look dire.
M, Wadhurst, UK
If,in the recent past, valuations had been honest,banks has insisted on a minimum 10/15% deposit and interest rates had been at 6 % the present housing situation would have been largely avoided.
The obvious is never spelled out,and I have never read this coming from a banker.
jackie, paphos, cyprus
What a lengthy article which shows only that comparisons such are these are both odious and, like this article, otiose.
Mike, Huntingdon,
The doomsday scenario would mean a return to the early 90s , the unemployment , the level of repossessions , the interest rates , the level of government borrowing , the crime levels of that time.
Hey bring the Tories back
stephen herlihy, Dursley,
I think he was trying to say "potentially" the largest threat. Who will be right in the end you or he? I seem to recall a recent article by you, suggesting that the present situation is not of grave proportions? Perhaps neither.
George Townsend, Elk Grove, USA
This is the first article in this newspaper which gives an intelligent and balanced view of our economic reality. Perhaps this was Darling's intention. If we can move onto a rational discussion of the economy then this apocolyptic outlook from the chancellor may be worth the hit.
M.Paton, Crowthorne,
In due course, when this period of economic upheaval can be viewed with more detachment, it will be recognised that the bulk of the 'crisis' was caused by the banks' avaricious, sleight-of-hand, dodgy dealing in re-packaged and suspect sub-prime loans. And little else, not even the oil price rise.
Ambatzi-Crecy, London, England
High comedy indeed. A country and media which has refused to believe a word this government has uttered in the last decade or so, has seized upon this gaff as 'ultimate truth', if only because feeds their own twisted conviction of Britain's economic and social inferiority and decline.
Geoff Harrison, Beverley, England
By presenting the Doomsday scenario over two years, when the next General Eection is due, nulabor will claim that, but for nulabor, it would have been much worse, and that the brown stuff has saved the country, for which we should all thank him with our votes.
martin, sheffield, uk