Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Britain will not increase troop numbers in Afghanistan, despite the escalation in violent attacks by the Taleban, a senior defence official said yesterday.
There will be no transfer of soldiers from Iraq when Britain’s presence there is cut back next year, the official said. The current total of 8,000 troops in Afghanistan was the “absolute ceiling” for Britain’s contribution to the Nato operation, he said.
There had been widespread expectation that the reduction in troops in Iraq next year would lead to a mini-surge in reinforcements for Helmand province in southern Afghanistan, where Britain’s military presence is concentrated. But it is now agreed that there will be no transfer of forces from one campaign to the other.
The Armed Forces had been operating beyond the Government’s planning assumptions (set in 1998) because of the twin operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the official said. The planned cutback in Iraq next year from 4,000 to “a few hundred” troops would have a beneficial effect across the Forces, he said, because the strain of running two simultaneous operations would be lifted.
Two years ago, General Sir Richard Dannatt, the Chief of the General Staff, said that the Army was operating at the limits of its capabilities.
The senior official said that the “fundamental change” in Britain’s military posture in Iraq, which Gordon Brown announced to the Commons in July, would begin to take effect in the latter part of next year. The anticipated 600-700 troops remaining in Iraq will be engaged in training the Iraqi Army’s 14th Division based in Basra.
The official said that the cutbacks could be justified because violence in Basra had been dramatically reduced, and the “IED [improvised explosive devices] networks had been disrupted.
The Americans are sending another 3,500 troops to Afghanistan in January and have promised to provide a further two combat brigades in due course.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This is a clear signal that Petraeus must do in A'stan what he did in Iraq, and more precisely in Al Anbar province: open his wallet and hire the insurgents to assemble the so called "concerned citizens". They are now standard thugs carving fiefdoms instead of dreaming about an impossible caliphate.
RONNIE, PARIS, FRANCE
Well William from Atlanta obviously hates the Brits, the only
true friends America has along with Canada-Australia-New
Zealand.
The British Government has formed the 6th Division to
command UK forces in Afghansitan, a division does not
command one Brigade, and so another will be sent.
Tom, Northampton, UK
Allah is all-powerful. Never forget Dost Mohamed and Lord Elphinstone.
Brian P O Cinneide, eThekwini, Afrika Borwa
Leave Afghanistan to its peope. It is a lost battle. They people of Afghnistan know how to deal with eachother. It is their problem.
Antonio da Silva, Rosario, argentina
Why is William writing from Atlanta and not the front line?
Who is the true armchair warrior, sorry, coward here?
One again the legendary Americam grasp of geography is apparent here, with William getting confused between Afghanistan, and drug infested inner city America.
Michael, Lurgan, UK
no point in reinforcing defeat and any way we can't afford it any more than I can afford to fly to some obscure place called Atlanta to punch an idiot called William on the nose, but he won't be there having heroically volunteered to go the war in Afghanistan I do most sincerely hope he has fun
peter c, Devizes, Wessex
William, atlanta, usa
Unlike the US (Vietnam, Somalia) the British know when a war is un-winnable. You can't win.. Britain has been fighting there for 170 years and one thing we know is that nothing has changed - it's time to draw a line under it.
You've been there 5 minutes and made no difference.
Andy (Ex-Forces), Cheshire, England
Safiullah Tazib, London, UK
British soldiers don't fear death, they in fact look forward to the fight. Unlike the Taliban though they don't go looking for death with a view to meeting up with the great sky faerie.
Andy (Ex-Forces), Cheshire, England
Britain follows the US in most economic and foreign policies. However, Brits are pragmatic folks and can see when an operation is so open ended that there are no yard sticks to measure progress. It is smart of them too bail out. Afterall, it is the US war in the first place.
John Yohansen, New Haven, US
Great Britain, with all its greatness looks cowed by Pakistanis.
But when Britain didn't have the stomach to fight, why on earth did it commit itself to the war on terror in the first place? I think fear of death has shaken British Army to its foundations.
Safiullah Tazib, London, UK
Yes, now you can have your opium back and at a better price. Too bad the USA has to take up your slack after backing out of your promise. No better the Spain. Its no wonder the once proud British people are cowed and your country overrun with Islamic fanatics and honor killings. Cowards,
William, atlanta, usa