Sam Coates, Chief Political Correspondent
Win VIP tickets

MPs have been told that they may be moved out of Parliament for up to three years under a £350 million renovation plan, The Times has learnt.
More than 500 miles of water pipes, electricity and telephone cables need to be replaced for the first time since the Second World War — the last time that MPs had to relocate. There is also a potentially serious problem with asbestos, making it the most extensive refit since the mid-19th century, when Sir Charles Barry rebuilt the Palace of Westminster.
The Commons authorities fear that “anything could go wrong at any moment”, pointing out that in the past month alone there were 33 “steam” leaks from hot water pipes.
The Lords has no need for equivalent renovations.
As The Times revealed a year ago, MPs may be relocated to the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, a 1986 concrete monolith across Parliament Square, for two or three years. This location is favoured because it would allow other parliamentary offices in Millbank, as well as Portcullis House and offices above Westminster Tube station, to continue to operate within walking distance of the makeshift “chamber”.
Nick Harvey, spokesman for the House of Commons Commission, announced yesterday that it was inviting bids for a £250,000 feasibility study to examine the option of relocating. The study would examine if “substantial savings in cost, time and risk could be made by moving some operations of both Houses out of the Palace for a period,” he said.
No decisions will be taken until the study reports in the middle of next year, officials said. However, The Times has learnt that senior House of Commons officials overseeing the operation endorse the principle of closing Parliament, as attempting to complete the work during summer recesses could take 25 years. The shift in opinion has come despite criticism from MPs when the idea was floated a year ago, when Sir Patrick Cormack, a Tory traditionalist, declared himself “flabbergasted”.
House of Commons sources have raised the inflammatory possibility that they may ask peers, rather than MPs, to vacate their debating chamber, with the Commons sitting on the red benches, as happened briefly during the war. Senior House of Lords figures made it clear, however, that this would be “wholly unacceptable”.
The final decision will be made by the House of Commons Commission in consultation with MPs.
Commons places
— The present day Houses of Parliament were built after a fire in 1834 destroyed all but Westminster Hall, the crypt of St Stephen’s Chapel and the Jewel Tower
— Church House, the Church of England headquarters, was requisitioned for use by the Commons within days of its steel-framed hall surviving a Nazi bomb in 1940
— On May 10, 1941, a bomb destroyed the House of Commons chamber. Sir Giles Gilbert Scott’s replacement was first used on October 26, 1950
Sources: Parliament website; Times database

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Spending money on restoring parliament building is wasted. Their is no justifacation for such expense when the financial system is at risk. Let the buildings crumble , it reflects the crumbling political system. Politicians do not deserve anything better than an assembly hall.
Jim Wills, Brisbane, Australia
Great idea, and don't let them back!
Paul Freeman, London, England
Oh dear they are going to have to have the builders in. Remember what happened when the Queen had them in at Windsor. Will they succeed where Guy Fawkes and the Luftwaffe failed?
cranford, poolw,
The Palace of Westminister is a national treasure and deserves every penny spent on it - unlike many other government projects of recent times
Dan, Winchester, England
It's "wholly unacceptable" for the elected chamber to take priority over the appointed one? Strange country.
Nick, London,
Why not move them somewhere more central? Like Birmingham or Manchester? Or the middle of the Atlantic?
Nobby Clark, Perth, the Scottish one,
Just for a moment I saw a bright light............
You realise, of course, that having to move will require our elected representatives to need higher rates of expenses!!!
If they would just represent us and not their party we might find things getting better but that's wishful thinking.
CAS, Leeds, Yorkshire
Rocky from Willenhall, please tell me you're joking?
Bradley, London, England
Why not sack the the lot of them - Brussels make most of the decisions anyway.
Think of the savings!
Jim, Stamford, UK
Magnificent on the outside, but dull and depressing on the inside, the Palace of Westminster needs a thorough makeover.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
They should take this chance to relocate to a new more 21st century building, similar to usa or european chambers 'in the round'. Given the threat to London of storm surge flooding, a move to central england would be good. Here on the Mercian Plateau we would welcome them
rocky, willenhall, uk
250,000 pounds, for a feasibility study!!!
good luck to you who still have to live there.
ernie, Nanning,
..Am I going to be the first to say it? The ejection is welcome: but can't we make it a permanent arrangement?
Abdul Majeed, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
£350 million!?!?!?!
That is an ominous indicator of what the take-over of the banks will mean for Britain. I would recommend selling up and moving to Argentina.
Greg Lorriman, Leathehead, UK