Owen Slot and Jill Sherman
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Two of the main venues in the Olympic Park may have to be nationalised, with the taxpayer paying nearly £900 million extra as the credit crunch hits the 2012 Games, The Times has learnt.
Ministers will meet Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, this week to consider ways of meeting the soaring bill after a lack of private investment. Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, Tessa Jowell, the Olympics Minister, and Hazel Blears, the Communities Secretary, have yet to agree how to find the cash, with Ms Blears resisting pressure to raid at least £250 million from her department.
Initially the private sector was expected to meet the full £1 billion cost of the Olympic Village and at least half the cost of the £400 million media centre.
A deal was supposed to have been reached with Lendlease, the developer of the Olympic Village, by the end of this year. But Lendlease has been unable to raise money because of the current financial crisis and the athletes’ accommodation will now be unviable without extra government funds.
About £550 million of government funding has already been allocated for Stratford Park and the infrastructure for the Olympic Village, including electricity cables and water supply. But an extra £850 million to £900 million still had to be found for the village through a mixture of funding from housing associations, private investment and the taxpayer. So far no money has been guaranteed from either the private sector or housing associations.
The cost of the village has gone down marginally as the number of houses was cut from 4,000 to 2,800 as a result of the housing market slump. The reduction has already led to fears that accommodation will be cramped, with athletes sharing rooms.
John Armitt, chairman of the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA), has argued that further time should be allowed to reach a deal with private investors but ministers are under pressure to underwrite the funding to restore confidence in the Olympic project. Mr Armitt has said that in the worst-case scenario the taxpayer might have to foot the whole bill.
Yesterday the ODA admitted that more public funding was necessary and indicated that Ms Blears’s department may have to contribute.
An ODA spokesman said: “More public sector investment will clearly be needed for the Olympic Village, given the problems in the banking sector and the deterioration in the property market. This would be an investment in a long-term housing asset that can then be sold in the future. Commercial discussions are continuing, and we remain committed to delivering the overall project within the £9.3 billion budget.”
It is understood that ministers will next week discuss an extra allocation of £450 million for the Olympic Village and the media centre, although this will not meet the entire cost of the projects. A spokesman for Ms Blears said that she expected any extra money to come from the Olympics contingency fund.
Olympic sources said that if the taxpayer met the full cost of the bill the Government would have complete ownership of the venues after the Games and could sell the homes for mixed social and private housing.
The lack of private investment in the park has already resulted in scaling down projects and moving venues, and there is growing concern that this could jeopardise the park’s legacy.
Also high on its agenda will be the fate of the Olympic basketball arena. The arena will cost £60 million but is only temporary and will thus have no legacy value.
Tessa Jowell, the Olympics Minister, said last night: “We are not going to lock ourselves into a private sector deal which will not give best value for the public. The village will be built, but how much will be public or private sector will be something that will be negotiated. If the private sector doesn’t put in equity now, it can do so later.”

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Seychellois beaches beckon from just £999 per person with Elite Vacations including air!
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Surely there are many facilities around the country that can be used for events, ie equestrian, and save all of us a lot of money. Why build a load of white elephants.
Gill, Grimsby, England
How many times do we have to repeat the same phrase before the government gets it in their heads:
"WE DON'T WANT THE OLYMPICS, NEVER DID, NEVER WILL"
David, St Albans, UK
Its going to keep escalating, look at the past games they have all been over budget and each one has gone more and more over budget recently. This may be a negative but think of the positives these facilities are going to be sustained, its the money pumped into the credit crunch we should question
Ed Ringwood, Petersfield, England
Another Labour white elephant, just like the Millenium Dome and we all know what a waste of money that was!
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
alex, forres, uk
So did I. I cursed Chirac the night that he said 'why should the Olympics go to England? They have the worst food in the northern hemisphere . . . . except for Finland' and that was enough to flip the Finnish vote in favour of London. I have moved to Paris.
david, Paris, France
All this money should be spent on child poverty, not the fulfilling of inflated egos.
Glyn Pope, Angers , France
Mark from Yorkshire.
My feelings exactly.
Well said
David Kinsley, Derby, UK
half the cost of the £400 million media centre. What is the point of this village in the middle of nowwhere. It will be a disaster like moving the BBC to Manchester, and to compound it all the staff of the BBC who moved have negative equity of the worst order as they all moved at the peak
Nicholas Iles, Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom
Enough is enough.
Tough times calls for tough decisions.
The Govt. will gain some respect from the taxpayers if the Olympics are shelved and show some credibility about saving taxpayers money.
Who cares about global posturing?
Oh yes! Of course Brown!
Dek Crossingham, Birmingham, England
it is a rerun of 1948. Most teams wont be able to afford to come.The rest will just be grateful there is someone daft enough to stage them in a period of austerity.
ged, manchester,
The whole world has changed since we agreed to host the 2012 Olympics. We can no longer afford to do so. This is Force Majeur and we should not feel in the slightest bit embarrassed in calling the whole thing off.
Tony Jones, Grantham, Lincs
Smart move would be to sell/concede Olympic rights to Madrid whose mayor is charged with bidding in 2016 ( is repeat in same continent within 4 years,a precedent??) and were competitors for 2012.
Rogelio, Calpe, Spain
Can I put a tender in to build the basketball arena for 50 million. That will save the tax payer 10 million and it only has to stand there for a couple of weeks before it's torn down. How hard can it be?
Phil, Atlanta, USA
Clearly the nation hasn't got the money for this. The organizers failed to get the funding necessary so they should be cutting their costs. Where are the plans to scale back this extravagent and trivial, pointless competition?
Chris, Derby,
This is a joke right?
Who is going to stand up and stop this madness?
The Olympics are not that important to the country.
This is London's problem, not mine.
DO NOT use my taxes for this.
Mark, Yorkshire,
It's just hubris at the expense of the ordinary citizen. I have been against the Olympics from the start. It has just become a competition to see who can put on the best show...yes the true Olympian spirit is a worthy thing but not when your economy is on the cusp of a major recession...
Shelasoul, London,
May be a meaningful lesson for Japan, whose capital is
now aiming to become the host of 2016 Ollympic Game.
M. Murakami, Tokyo , Japan
So we in the provinces are expected to bail out londons olympics and get next to nothing in return?London and the south-east are the main beneficaries of the olympics,so let them pay.
martin, darlington, england
It would be useful produce a list of things that arent going to get bailed out, as the bailout list is getting too long to follow now.
I shall have a go:
1. The taxpayer.
I think thats the lot.
Pat, Coromandel, NZ
If only we had a government or a Mayor of London who would have the guts to cancel this stupidity.
Frederick, London, UK
Why should we waste more money tarting up London again?
David, Poole,
We were not balloted about the olympics and we should not have to pay for them ... If they were being held in Manchester or Birmingham the cost would not be so great - why London - a drowning dirty inaccessible pile of historic mess?
Sue Reynolds, Sudbury, Derbyshire
This is all deja - vu. We knew when it was announced that we would have literally to pay through the nose for some-thing that only those in the afflent south could enjoy. Shame on you surely the Senior Citizens deserve an extra slice of the pie instead of the unworkable, unmanageable, unwanted games
James Robertson, Accrington, U>K>
I agree with Charlie - we CAN'T afford to host the Olympic Games, so let's admit it! I, for one, am not willing to give 1p of my money to fund the games - will we, as taxpayers, be allowed to opt out of paying for them?
Jax, Brighton, UK
tHIS GOVERMENTS RESPONSE to anything . throw taxpayers money at it .Most of the events are using existing venues so why does it cost so much? No the NHS is not starved of cash its Glutted on bureacracy.
g.p.edlin, london , uk
The building for the games is a joke, the equestrian park which they are determined to build in inner London is set to be dismantled afterwards. Other countries have national equestrian centres, this should be an opportunity to provide better permanent facilities throughout the UK for all sports.
Claire, Reading,
We should just give back the rights of Olympics to the international organization that deal with it.It is still cheaper.We do need to bite our pride but need to admit it that we can not host an Olympic game.Full stop.
Charlie Koch, Birmingham, England
But hey, around one third of the Uk thinks new Labour IS working if you believe the polls! Who ARE these people?
Simon Robinson, Gibraltar, Gibraltar
We have the same problem with the 2010 winter games in Whistler. Taxpayers money to allow a few nonentities ( organisers) to strut their stuff in front of the world cameras. . I think the Winter Olympics needs $60 million to complete the athletes village. Sound familiar?
wxalexander, Delta, canada
Does this mean we get free tickets, and free travel on the partially nationalised rail service? Higher rates for saver and lower rates for mortgage holder on the partially nationalised bank service? Can we have lower taxes as the taxpayer is funding Labour's mess of the economy? Is Brown smiling?
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
Portugal built 9 football stadia for less than the cost of Wembley.
Hand the whole thing over to them to build as our architects and contractors are too bound by their own egos.
Danny, Ashford, Kent
sell the Olympics to the French the electricity to light the arenas will be 3/4 the cost !
Mike, Sole Street, England
This is the time to bring the Olympic costs back into line for the future. London should reduce the size of the total Olympic site, extend the Olympic period and use the accomondation and stadiums/facilities multiple times. Give longer employment to the many part timers to make London 2012 the best
Sue, Swindon,
When the initial 2.4 billion cost was announced, I immediately said that the final cost would be ten times that amount - so who is surprised? Whether it is worth that amount is a matter of debate.
alex, forres, uk
Scrap this nonsensical whimsy and pay pensioners to stay warm and not die in the winter. At this rate,Cameron and co must be wondering if it will be worth getting into power,what with all the debts to settle. No wonder Broon don't care anymore,it won't be his problem !!!
Keith Rogers, arapkoy, cyprus
Alistair
Lord Coe and his mates are lining their pockets.
Are their no checks on how these people are remunerated? Millions already paid in fees.
No wonder they were so ecstatic when London was awarded the games.
Peter Lewin, Northwood, UK
another mess, Did we not all know this was going to happen,A silly non realistic first costing to get everybody on board then bang off it goes spiraling out of control upwards endlessly upwards this government has and does treat us all as idiots..And what for a glorified school sports day
WILLIAM, NORTHAMPTON, ENGLAND
Nice drawing by the way. Reminds me of something. Ah yes. The Millenium Dome, another BliarBroon production of lasting value to the nation.
Better a lame duck now than a dead duck then. We can't afford the athletes but we can afford paying to enrich developers and bankers ? Weezbin robd.
Tezza, Guildford, UK
The Olympics has come at the worst possible time for the UK economy. The UK economy is in extremely serious trouble, with far worse prospects than the US or Euro land. Stop expenditure and cancel the Olympics immediately.
Ron, Oxon,
I don't suppose Lord Coe would consider asking the Lords of the Rings to reduce their substantial fee?
Colin, Melbourne,
How was it that the L.A. Olympics did not cost the taxpayer, Federal, State, County or City, one penny? By using existing facilities and the commercial endorsement of venues. And - it made a profit! The same could have been done with London, a larger city. A pity that Greek pressed the wrong button.
David Cunard, Los Angeles, United States
The government will print the money to meet these liabilities effectively raising the money by inflation which will most affect people on fixed incomes. Government employees with index linked pensions will be largely unaffected.
Julian Pedley, Mansfield, UK
Yet even more reason to put a serious brake on this excessive and expensive ego-trip. These astronomical sums being spent on a two-week sporting event are unjustifiable in the current economic climate and God knows what state we'll be in come 2012. Taxpayers money should be used for more wisely.
Ian Dickson, Brighton, UK
what - the tax payer is going to get shafted again?? my word, there's a surprise.
Shift the horsey stuff to well established venues, shooting to Bisley , rowing etc if not already sorted - Henley. Sailing is already set..UK is tiny. Use it all and make it the UK Olympics. Don't spend unnecessarily
Alex Dean, NY, USA
Hmm, and to think, I thought tax payers money was being used for the Olympics in the first place: how wrong I was...
Farrukh, Woking,
Any surprise, but surely with a lack of new builds starting, labour should be cheaper, materials are coming down in price. Who is lining their pockets with this one?
Alistair Kipling, Birmingham,
use to have a brilliant sports day at school, i reckon i could compete fro gold in the egg and spoon race and they dont charge much for hiring out school playing fields.
amit hindocha, birmingham, uk
If I remember correctly it was Ken Livingstone "I Presume?" who said "nobody outside the London Area will pay anything,it will cost the Council tax Payers the price of a Walnut Whip,it will cost 2.2 Billion " We should give China the chance to hold them again and who knows,gain some Respect .
G.D Flynn, Rotterdam/Hague, Netherlands
Its high time the government took the bull by the horns and conceded that neither the UK, nor indeed the world, can afford the 2012 Olympics. I am completely nonplussed as to why money can be found to fund a fortnight of sports when the NHS is kept severely short of funds?
Peter, Pinner, UK
Well what is an odd ten billion here and a hundred million there! Superman Brown and his followers could not find after all the £500bn they have so far thrown about. Just tap the current tax payers or better still the future ones who can be bequeathed with all lovely public borrowings to settle.
S Yogarajah, Harrow, UK