David Byers
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Comment Central: a question for Nick Clegg
David Cameron today ditched his party's commitment to match Gordon Brown's public spending until 2011, claiming that Britain had "maxed out on its credit card".
In a shift of policy designed to place clear blue water between the two main parties, the Conservative leader said that the Government's spending plans for 2010-11 were unsustainable after years of borrowing, creating a "bombshell" that would necessitate steep tax rises in future.
Mr Cameron also indicated that he may oppose the Prime Minister's proposed short-term tax-cuts, or "fiscal stimulus", which the Government is expected to announce in next Monday's Pre-Budget report, although he would not confirm whether he would vote against them until he saw the details.
He said that widespread tax-cuts would be unaffordable during a recession, leaving the Treasury forced inevitably to raise taxes steeply in the long term.
The Tory leader hopes that the announcement — made less than a week before Labour unveils its own plans in detail in Alistair Darling's Pre-Budget report — will free the party to make future tax pledges without being straitjacketed by spending commitments. He has asked a team of strategists to study Whitehall budgets in order to find potential savings to fund future tax cuts.
He hopes his proposals, rubber-stamped by the Shadow Cabinet at a meeting this morning, will give the Tories a clear sense of economic direction for the coming months, easing nerves among the public that Mr Brown is better placed to steer Britain through recession.
The policy-shift creates the prospect of an unlikely battle at the next general election between a tax-cutting Labour Government and Tories opposing such moves.
Critics, however, labelled Mr Cameron's policy "the economics of the madhouse", saying that cutting spending during a recession would lead to increased poverty in already tough times.
"Labour’s economic mismanagement makes it vital for the long-term health of our economy that we set a new path for restraining the growth of spending," Mr Cameron said, indicating that a £30 billion injection to the economy would mean an 8 per cent rise in income tax later.
"That means for the year 2010-11 we need change, not more of the same. That means reducing planned government spending growth and not matching Labour’s spending plans.
"To be absolutely clear: to stop future tax rises, the growth rate of spending in 2010-11 will have to be lower than the growth rate laid out by Labour. The growth rates of spending in the years beyond 2010-11, pencilled in by the Chancellor last year, are also now unsustainably high."

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
bob swindon, you are miles out, even labour say we owe about 40% of gdp. whereas in fact when you include bank bailouts nationalisations and libor guarantees, not to mention the £100 billion+ of pfi we owe more like 100% or more of gdp.
taxes debt and public spending are no basis for any ecconomy
will, grimsby, uk
Bob, Swindon
Debt may be lower, but 1993 was the start of economic growth when Britain was in a position to service the debt. We are now going into deep recession when we cannot. It is yet another irresponsible example of borrowing by Brown.
David, Doncaster, UK
Rocky - you have a shorter memory than me. The 80's came after Labour's total running down of Britain in the 70's. It took about five years to put right - thats why Thatcher won 3 elections in a row.
David, Doncaster, UK
Proof that the Conservative party has adopted the path of prudence over petty populism. Wasteful expenditure must be removed at any point in an economic cycle, and necessary expenditure maintained at every point in the cycle. The Labour government has done the opposite at all points in the cycle.
James E. Petts, Burnham, England
There seems to be a lot of flip-flopping with regards to Gordon Brown's ability to run this country. He obviously failed and must go. Not much point in trying to blame the opposition's statements.
al, London, UK
The amount we are borrowing only makes sense when taken as a percentage of GDP (i.e. how much you owe over how much you earn). Our debt now is roughly 3.5% of GDP, in 1993 it was closer to 7%. Don't believe everything you hear and read.
Bob, Swindon,
what happens if the rest of g20 leave gordon with a massive millstone his and our necks, if we are going to have to pay it back why not start now by tightning the proverbial belt.
ken moody, sheffield,
Cameron is now back to the same policies that failed in the 80s. Flip flop, flip flop. Memories must be very short indeed of why the Tories failed. UK Plc was run down,. Public services were on their knees because of these policies, which in turn lead to many of the deep social problems now faced.
Ian, London, uk
Rocky, London
If there is a wolf at the door, you don't leave the door wide open and then fall asleep for ten years. And when said wolf enters and tears up the place, you don't claim absolution by saying you didn't give birth to the wolf. Yet plenty are willing to swallow it. Bizzarre!
James David, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Rocky claims others don't read the news, but how long has he been around? Anyone my age can remember at least three Labour governments. Each one inherited a sound economy from the previous administration, and each one blew the money away, leaving its successors to pick up the pieces. Remember IMF?
Richard B, West Wales, UK
alternatively stop spending large sums of money on benefits and send the current recipients to afghanistan - two birds with one stone...
andrew, london,
Cutting public spending is the only way to ease the crisis, sadly jobs will go but why should we the taxpayer have to pay for more of them than we need! Brown would never do this as it would risk losing votes from the only fools stupid enough to vote for them again! Rocky from london wake up!
hamish, london,
Borrowing above our means is what has caused this whole mess in the first place. Now Brown wants to exacerbate his folly. He's clearly learnt nothing then to hide his head in the sand and borrow more, putting of the real issues till tomorrow. How did this complete fool ever get to power?
Darren, London,
Tax is only payable if you have a JOB (or pension), without action tax increases wont matter to a lot of people!
Dan, Ipswich,
the simple truth is that the bloated public sector is unaffordable, major cuts need to be made in it now.
john g, london, uk
Well said. Its pretty obvious that if you overborrow now somebody has to pay in the future. Labour cant just keep borrowinglike there is no tomorrow.
Ian, BRISTOL, UK
At last the politics have turned and someone is brave enough to say that throwing money at a problem is not the solution. Look at Baby P, £100million spent on children's services could not save him. The state should do much less and do it much better and attempt to fix the rot at the core of society
Bruce Mcaaw, Grantham,
I have an idea, it's slightly crazy but it might just work... stop spending large sums of money fighting pointless wars in countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. Sorry, but somebody needed to point it out to them.
julian, shrewsbury, uk
Good! Gordon Brown's tax cuts will be like the 10p tax band anyway, and make everyone, but especially the poorest pay more, and trashing the economy before he is booted out at the next election will just leave us all with a massive debt to pay off whilst he enjoys his platinum plated pension.
Peter, London,
The problem with cameron and the conservatives is that they will continue, and this is absolutely important, they will continue to propagate this idea that the bank of england should be given greater independence when in fact history shows that the central bank is a BIG part of the problem here.
simon lomax, warrington, uk
Saying cutting spending will make it tougher for people in a recession assumes Gordon Brown's profligate spending is efficient - it is not. Cutting spending on massive waste will not result in reduced public services - it will actually improve them
Peter, London,
Correct. Couldn't agree more. The country is BANKRUPT. Brown has BLOWN it all.
He now aims to cynically buy votes to win an election. The pain will come tenfold down the line.
At least Cameron's got the guts to tell the truth, but do the dim British have the guts to listen?
Dave White, Notts, UK
sorry rog j , this is a world problem, not one of labours creation, or don't you read the news?
cameron makes it up as he goes along, him and osbourne justhaven't got a clue.
other world leaders are following browns ideas. i know who i'd rather have in charge now..
rocky, london, uk
It will be the taxpayer, as usual, who will pick up the tab for the Labour government's incompetence and the financial sector's irresponsibility, excesses and greed. Very little else will change. We can then look forward to the next crisis.
Rog J, Portsmouth, uk