Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The sharply rising costs of the war in Afghanistan were laid bare yesterday when the Ministry of Defence said that it would need more than £2.3 billion from Treasury reserves to pay for the campaign in Helmand province this year.
The estimated cost for Iraq in the same period will be nearly £1.4 billion, despite the planned reduction of British troops in the south from the present 4,100 to a few hundred from May.
The latest combined estimated bill of £3.7 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan this year means that the two operations will have cost the taxpayer £13.2 billion over the past six years.
Most of the funds have come from Treasury contingency reserves, although the MoD has had to bear some of the financial burden from its own budget to share the costs of new armoured vehicles sent to Iraq and Afghanistan.
If troop cuts go ahead in Iraq as planned, the cost of Operation Telic — codename for the military campaign — should come down markedly next year. The reduced military presence, which could even be cut to zero by the end of 2009, would be concerned solely with training the Iraqi Army’s 14th Division based in Basra. This would make it possible to transfer much-needed helicopters and other equipment to Afghanistan.
The cost of Operation Herrick, the campaign in Helmand, however, looks set to rise and rise. The bill in 2005-06 was £199 million. This increased to £738 million the following year, when British troop numbers were boosted to 7,500, and the cost last year was £1.5 billion. This was largely due to the multiple orders from the MoD for hundreds of extra armoured vehicles to meet “urgent operational requirements”.
Force protection has become the key issue after the deaths of about 36 British service personnel, killed by roadside bombs and landmines while travelling in the lightly armoured Snatch Land Rovers, sent to Iraq and Afghanistan from Northern Ireland.
Extra measures have also had to be taken to improve the survivability of helicopters in the harsh environment of Iraq and Afghanistan, and to fit better communications to all aircraft.
Costs for Operation Herrick will rise further if ministers give in to pressure from Barak Obama, when he becomes US President in January, for Britain to send more troops to Afghanistan. The Government has not ruled out sending more troops, but with 8,100 already serving in Afghanistan, Washington has been told that other Nato countries should be first in line to boost troop numbers.
In anticipation of British troop reductions in Iraq in the spring, a restructuring of coalition regional commands was announced yesterday. Until now the region south of Baghdad has been divided into three multinational divisional areas — centre, under US control; centre-south, under the Poles; and southeast, controlled by the British.
In future, there will only be one multinational divisional command headquarters south of Baghdad, which will be run by the Americans, who will also take “overwatch” control of three provinces that were once the responsibility of the British — Muthanna, Dhi Qar and Maysan, the security for which was handed over to the Iraqis some time ago.
The British southeast area of responsibility will be confined to Basra.

Sam Coates's blog about Westminster, politics and spin
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Think how that £3.7 bn could be used to help with the financial crisis
Richard, Wolverhampton,
Who on earth, apart from Paul above, thinks that "they" (whoever "they may be), are being dissuaded from bombing London by our antics in Afghanistan? Cocaine has NEVER been cheaper!, that is the measure of our "success" in Afghanistan, Lots of dead people, young and old, are the downside.
John Wood, Uxbridge, UK
Why are we there? our young men are fighting to curb the actions of the tribes which will resume their acts of terror once the troops have been pulled out. Its just hidden politics at work once again.
graham hadley, Welshpool, Wales
DEBT & WAR DEBT - We are broke forever !!!!!!
ian payne, walsall,
And there go the Aircraft Carriers
Phill, Cheshire, UK
Pull troops out of Iraq now..they don't want us there anymore. Leave them selves to themselves. We have a proper job to do in Afghanistan. Kick those countries out of NATO that are just in it for a laugh. Time to set up a new organisation.
kirk, Rotherham, UK
Blairs Folly, and the taxpayer is paying.
Mike, Paphos, Cyprus
What a waste. In a world marked by global problems we need to use our resources strategically - we don't have resources to waste. Bush made mad decisions and he, one wonders how, made Blair wag his tail and load the guns. Bush is history, so's Blair - howbout leaving Iraq and Afghanistan alone??
Stefan Hultberg, roskilde, denmark
Although it would probably have made little difference £13bn is a substantial sum which we should never have spent. No wonder our fellow Europeans have been reluctant to get seriously involved, obviously ruled by wiser heads than us especially where lies were the excuse for war.
mike gee, bournemouth, uk
We should not be in Afghanistan and we clearly cannot afford to be... so lets get out.
Andrew brown, derby, UK
Isn't that about the same as the amount wasted on the new NHS computer system?
Martin, Reading , UK
I agree. This is a joke. This was has nothing to do with us and is an illegal war without no UN resolution. I should ask for a refund in my tax return.
James Carter, Reading, England
Still a lot less than the wealth of each of the first twenty of the worlds richest billionairs.
derek, Huntingdon , England
I accept Marcus of London's comments however he fails to realise that if we do not fight the Taliban in thier own backyard, "they" will be bombing London and other Cities around the world.
This is why the troops are there!
Paul , Leeds, UK
I think I have no option but to stop paying taxes. No taxes = No money to fund this un-winnable war and more British deaths. I want my money to fund Universities and the Health Service not this. I was never asked if my money should go towards this debacle. It's despicable!
Marcus, London, England