THEY are renowned for their dirty tricks, but if you want to see just how low Liberal Democrats stoop during a campaign, then turn to the internet.

The party refused to give any of the leadership candidates access to data on their electoral register, meaning that websites have played a crucial part in getting out their message. Andrew Craig, the editor of Web User magazine rated the sites for The Times.

Campbellcampaign.org 4/5

It is not a pretty site, but it is very clever and incorporates all the latest bells and whistles, such as podcasts, a blog, video and a clever use of Google Maps to locate speeches and supporters. On the negative side, the navigation options are too long and it would be difficult to browse in a hurry. Also, there is no photo gallery. Camera shy? This is the site most likely to appeal to the web-savvy voter.

Chris2win.org 3/5

Chris Huhne gets extra marks for immediately telling you who he is and what the site is about, but loses them straight away thanks to the enormous and frankly terrifying photo of Claire Rayner on the home page. There is a podcast, a blog and a rather clumsy photo gallery. It is pretty easy to find your way around, but the facility to register your support is rather hidden.

Simonhughesforleader.com 2/5

Worst of the bunch, this is a great example of what a website would have looked like two years ago, with overuse of unhelpful graphics with phrases such as “More supporters than any other” that give you no idea what you are clicking on. There is no sign of a podcast or video, reaffirming the outdated feel of the whole site. The only bright moment is the photo gallery, which is nicely constructed.

Times Recommends

• An officer and a gentle woman
• Dame Helen Mirren is worthy of the Epidaurus
• Foods that can help to prevent swine flu