Jonathan Richards
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Facebook, the fast-growing social network, has been forced to update its privacy settings after it was pointed out that users may unwillingly have been exposing certain personal details on the site.
Privacy officers at Facebook were alerted to the problem by a blog post which claimed that, even if users had set their profile to 'private', certain information - such as their sexual preference and religious beliefs - could be revealed in a search of the site.
The situation meant that anyone could search for a user's name and, by narrowing the query according to various categories, find out details that the user did not intend to disclose.
Defenders of the site said that users had always been able to limit what people browsing could find out about them using the search function, but Facebook administrators said that it had been a mistake not to have the privacy settings in search accord by default with those in a user's profile.
"If you undertook an advanced search, it may have been possible to see a piece of information in a person's profile, even if that profile was private," Chris Kelly, chief privacy officer at Facebook told Times Online.
"Information that was available through search did not adequartely match the information in a profile, but we've now fixed that," he said, adding that the site's "mission" remained to leave control over information "in the hands of users."
In a blog post that was picked up widely on the internet, Chris Soghoian wrote: "A large number of (Facebook) users have gone to the effort to restrict who can view their profiles, but many, unfortunately, remain exposed to a trivial attack."
The post was picked up on Wired.com, and soon after, Facebook representatives replied on Mr Soghoian's blog that the site had updated its settings "so that profile information that has been made private by a user, such as gender, religion, and sexual orientation, will not return a result."
Anna Martinez, 29, who has used Facebook since November, said: "The whole reason Facebook is so appealing to people who don't normally go online to socialise is the selectivity about who gets to see your stuff and who doesn't," Anna Martinez, 29, who has used Facebook since November, said.
"I set my privacy setting so that only my "friends" could see me. To discover that people might have been able to find out information through this loophole makes me feel vulnerable, and a little scared."
A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office said: "We would continue to warn people that there are risks associated with posting information online, and urge them to give out personal information with great care."
Facebook had 3.2 million visitors in the UK in May, making it the third most popular network behind MySpace and Bebo.
Its audience has increased by more than 500 per cent in the past 6 months - nearly 20 times the growth rate of MySpace's.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Get Times news, business and sport on your mobile. Text Times to 86626


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Oh dear.. when will people learn. If you put information on-line it is potentially available for anyone to access, despite any assurances to the contrary. Don't blame Facebook... just don't take the chance. If you don't want everyone to know your sexual preferences for example, don't post them on line - full stop.
I am always fully aware that if I give any information to any organisation, be it on-line or otherwise, it is potentially available to anyone. While I might just trust, say, my bank or a government department (ho ho) - and probably couldn't get the product or service I want without divulging some information - I certainly wouldn't trust a site like Facebook!!
Why don't these people grow up and be a little less naive about what they're doing and expecting.
Stuart, Halifax, UK
Of course, to exploit this "flaw" the user must first have that information in his/her profile, and the searcher must search for the specific user and the specific phrase. It's not a global search bug.
Hilary, Birmingham,