Will Pavia
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Click here for news, pictures and video from the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas
James O’Connell stares at the flat screen television that is playing the latest Harry Potter film on the latest player. It is a Blu-ray, the device now tipped to replace DVD players in every living room.
“It’s all right,” he says. Then he crosses the floor of the branch of Curry’s in South London to examine another screen playing Batman Returns. This time the film is running on an HD DVD player, a device that – until the beginning of this week – seemed just as likely to be the next descendant in the family tree of home cinema devices.
“I can’t really tell the difference,” he says. Both are producing sharper pictures than he is used to on his DVD player. Still, the leap in quality is far smaller than the leap that persuaded millions to abandon their VHS machine and buy a DVD player.
The shop assistant acknowledges that the picture quality only really becomes apparent on large (42inch) top-of-the-range high-definition television screens, which cost about £1,000.
There were rival formats for the first DVD player, but a compromise was reached before any device reached the market. Sony was perceived to have lost out in that battle – just as it had lost out in the VHS/Betamax war.
The electronics giant may have had a metaphorical chip on its shoulder when it began pushing another new format: a redesigned DVD that would be read by a high-frequency blue laser.
This time no compromise was found between Blu-ray and Toshiba’s HD DVD player. Software companies and Hollywood studios aligned behind their preferred player and consumers faced a choice between two expensive devices – either of which could yet be rendered obsolete.
Screen Digest, the media research company, estimates that in Britain in 2007, 7,000 Blu-ray players were sold. However, the Blu-ray was incorporated within Sony’s PlayStation 3, which sold about 754,000 consoles. This compared with 15,000 HD DVD players and 40,000 HD DVD drives built to attach to the Xbox console.
Though there were many more Blu-ray players thanks to sales of the PlayStation 3, the discs sold (470,000 Blu-Ray discs, 200,000 HD DVDs) indicated a more even contest. Equally, the great technology war appears something of a minority interest, when compared with the 250 million DVDs that sold.
Most of Hollywood seems to have made its choice: in the Blu-ray corner there is Columbia, Disney, Twentieth Century Fox, Lionsgate, Miramax, New Line, Sony and now Warner Brothers, who previously produced for both formats.The Warner Brothers decision to come off the fence should mean that a projected 75 per cent of the top 100 DVDs will eventually be available only on Blu-Ray. Paramount and Universal, which still back HD DVD, may yet switch sides. In any case, punters at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas seem confident that the battle is almost over.
Back in the electronics store in South London, few shoppers seemed aware of the “war”. Some still seemed keen on the HD DVD player, though buyers for either model were few and far between – the shop assistant acknowledged that costs will need to fall before that changes.
“I think I prefer the Blu-ray,” said Mr O’Connell, 40, a roofer from Uxbridge. “But I’d have to ask the wife.”
Manufacturers including Samsung and LG have launched dual format players, but the price is prohibitive.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I would not mind the more expensive and region limited Blu Ray winning if it was better and there had been fair competition. However, the video quality is exactly the same (1080p is 1080p), HD DVD is region free and, due to the technology (a shorter wavelength for Blu Ray), it is cheaper to manufacture both HD DVDs and the players. The main reason that Blu Ray seems to be winning is collusion on the part of the studios, remember Sony owns a studio as well as the patents on Blu Ray; seems like an anti-trust suit waiting to happen, oh, I forgot, the Bush Administration approves of abuse of market power, witness Microsoft being let off after being convicted of anti-trust violations.
In the long run downoads may replace high definition DVD but in the long run we are all dead. According to cable company studies it will take 5-10 years to have a critical mass of optical cable to the consumers. That is why you will have to choose a player.
Ian, Frederick, USA MD
singh
they may say they upscale to 1080p (the ps3 does infact do this) however this requires the player to interpolate the missing information and make the picture better without the true information contained on the high def Blu ray or HD DVD players. The winner was always going to be Blu ray (800,000 players to 100,000) Have a PS3 and a pioneer up scalling DVD player that came out three years ago its god but the PS3 Blu ray is better
simon mackie, newcastle,
What i dont under stand is When there are DVD players availible in market which can upscale movies to 1080p, what is the use of Blu ray player????
Singh, new delhi, india
Like DVD players, wait a few years when 42" 1080p tvs are $300 these players will be practically given away at $50 and region free. That way when you buy a movie when you travel, you can still play the discs. If you buy now, you're paying an early adopter sucker fee for a disk library that is extremely small.
Christopher Hylarides, Toronto, Canada
Heh, its just like crackers (NOT HACKERS) do. They either create an emulator for the disc to function on a normal dvd or hd dvd or blu ray dvd, have the user install it, and boom it works. All you need is lots and lots of time, and some good fingers. If you don't already know by now (For those in a Generation other than X) Emulators have been around for a long time. The industries have been fighting a losing war. Programmers win, its simple. 1 programmer will always be able to out do the other. Hell, all the movie industries, video game industries, etc., are taking massive blows to their head because of programmers. They create emulators that can run video games that you download or 'rip' or own, on a normal cd rom drive. Get with the programmers, they will always win.
~Hawk_Galens~, Somewhere, Around there
The future of movies is through the internet, thus either format is really much less important then they make it seem like.
A, aaaa,
Really does not matter, the studios will push the format with the most protection. Just as the eliminated VHS even when the market was strong they will kill off any other media that they can't protect. Poor HDTV's react really poorly with compressed movies nad flash and streaming movies are highly compressed. Blu-Ray will survive the same way DVD's survived. They simply gave you no other choice.
Don, panama city, fl
Just an other way of getting consumers to spend.
Iamagin the billions the companies will racke in from consumers now forced to replace perfectly good DVD equipment... taxe profits will be enourmous. Need I ask who wins in this game??
Helmut Somogyi, Lake Country, Canada
You're probably wasting your money buying either of these technologies. The fact is that both Blu Ray and HD DVD have been superseded by flash memory devices such as SDHC.
Sony and Toshiba however have a lot of R&D money to recoup so they will make us suffer with these machines for a couple of years before hitting us again with a change. Stick with your DVD for a while yet.
Raymond Abraham, Auckland, NZ
Talk about confused customers. The only difference between Blu Ray and HD DVD is Disk capacity. Video quality is a independent factor. 720p video and screens are only a 25% increase on DVD so do not show a marked difference. NB a film in 720p will easily fit onto a normal duel layer DVD !
1080p video and screens are a better buy (when prices drop) as quality increase is almost double that of DVD. The file size of a film in this format will exceed 20Gb so requires either HD DVD or Blu Ray high capacity disk.
Don, Bradford, West Yorks, UK
The war is pretty much over, unfortunately we'll still get clueless sales assistants from the usual big box bottom rung electronics stores pushing HD DVD hardware on clueless customers over the coming few weeks. Oh well.
JD, London,