Bernhard Warner
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Viruses, worms and Trojans have probably done as much for Apple’s ascendancy in recent years as any single advertising campaign. Talk to any recent defector from Windows and invariably the security issue will be among the reasons for making the switch. Compared to the patch-obligatory PC experience, a war zone of zero-day exploits and encrypted Trojans, the Mac world is a walk in the park, it seems. While Mac users are blissfully unaware of malware their neighbour’s PC has no doubt been commandeered by Russian gangsters, or worse, by the Chinese military preparing for a cyber invasion on Parliament at 0100 hours.
Unfortunately, the cybercrime wave has caught up to Mac users in recent months. It was only a matter of time…
“Mac is still a safer place to be than Windows by a long stretch,” says Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.
“But, the truth is, financially motivated hackers are targeting Mac users like they never have before,” he said, adding that he expects Mac-specific security threats to escalate over the next year. In the past, Mac exploits were written by researchers for the purpose of threat-modelling. The occasional piece of Mac-specific malware would circulate online, but it never travelled very far and never attracted the interest of profiteering hackers who were too busy plundering PCs. That has all changed within the past few months.
In November, Mr Cluley said, the most sophisticated exploit yet specifically targeting Mac users emerged in the form of a piece of malware called the “OSX/RS Plug.” The RS Plug, a type of Trojan, employed all the latest gimmicks to ensnare its prey. It embedded itself on friendly looking websites, where an errant click by the Mac user would infect the computer. Once inside the victim’s machine, the Trojan would do the usual nasty thing, sniffing out valuable personal details on the hard drive. RS Plug was written by a prolific hacking group called ZLOB, an outfit that specialises in Windows exploits and have infected hundreds of websites with this piece of malware, Mr Cluley said.
RS Plug is not on anybody’s ‘top five threat’ list, but its emergence is still significant. If financially motivated hackers succeed in fleecing Mac users with their exploits, more and more Mac exploits will be written in the future, the thinking goes. Call it a proof-of-concept. If Mac users prove as vulnerable as their Windows brethren you can bet the hacking gangs will diversify to reach this emerging market.
“Mac users need to get their head out of the sand and say to themselves there could be more serious threats I need to watch out for,” says Mr Cluley, himself a Mac user.
Web security specialists are not well liked by the everyday computer user. Their job is to identify all the risks involved in being connected, all the websites we shouldn’t visit, all the e-mail attachments we shouldn’t click on. It’s a sermon we don’t want to think about when we’re chatting with friends, checking e-mail or leisurely surfing the web. I understand, fellow Mac user, your instinct to dismiss Mr Cluely’s tip as hot air, a ploy maybe to sell more anti-virus software. (I also understand that Mac users are truly the most stubborn creatures on the planet who snarl at any suggestion that there could be a flaw in an Apple product).
As a Mac user myself, one who made the switch last year, I too would like to think this is a threat that will pass. After all, Mac users are more sophisticated. We wouldn’t unknowingly install some dubious code or fall for a too-good-to-be-true phishing scam, unleashing a global contagion. Would we?
Of course one of us would. And that’s the worrying part. It just takes a few stumbling Mac users to put us all in harm’s way.
Well now, you’ve been warned. Your invincibility shield no longer exists. Your Mac is only marginally more secure than your neighbour’s PC. I know this is all very hard to swallow. But there is some hope yet. There is still time to put the genie back in the bottle. If we stay clear of dodgy e-mail attachments and websites the hacking gangs will ignore us and concentrate solely on the tens of millions of PC users out there. Mac users, don’t be stubborn this time.
---
Bernhard Warner, a freelance journalist and media consultant, writes about technology, the internet and media industries. He can be reached at techscribe@gmail.com
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Get Times news, business and sport on your mobile. Text Times to 86626


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think the phrase 'marginally more secure than your neighbourâs PC' is extremely misleading. I know PC users who have asked me to look at their PCs and they have had hundreds of viruses and other threats on their machines. And I mean hundreds, one PC I looked at recently had 372 threats on it. And there are thousands - maybe tens of thousands - of PC viruses.
My weekly scan of my main PC found six threats this week, and I don't visit dodgy web sites.
It's extremely unlikely that attacks on Macs will reach this level in the foreseeable future.
What's the ratio? Thousands of Windows viruses and, er, one OSX virus... I'm scared...
clivex, Bristol,
Macs are based on a flavor of BSD UNIX. UNIX was built from the ground up with the idea that it would be attached to an unfriendly network. UNIX encourages user to perform day to-day working an account with limited privileges (whereas most people are encouraged to use admin accounts for surfing the net on Windows). This has proven to be vastly more secure since UNIX offered multi-user computing in 70s, as malware cannot access any integral part of your system unless you say it can by providing your admin password. Just visiting a site in windows can be instantly enslaved in a botnet.
Windows has only just encouraged users to work in non-admin accounts... 38 years later... and still sets your first account as admin by default.
"Your Mac is only marginally more secure than your neighbourâs PC"
- Only true if it is running Linux
Devon Buchanan, Bristol,
I converted to a mac because it works ... not security issues. Try using a mac and you will know what I mean.
Ron, Frankston, Australia
Like a plane crash, or large scale natural disaster, this has only been turned into a news story by virtue of it's rarity. Microsoft software and operating systems are plagued by a daily deluge of new and old viruses due to the appallingly bad software engineering quality and design in Microsoft products. I am a Windows user and not a Mac user (not through choice), but Macs (and Linux) are far in advance in every respect, especially ease of use and security, than anything that will ever come from Microsoft. The good news is the debacle of Vista has driven vastly more people to Mac and Linux than would otherwise have been the case,. and the tide is now truly turning in that respect.
Alex Kerr, London, UK
The true reason for having a Mac is : IT WORKS !
Lieury, Paris,
The other week I saw this in the wild. On a Russian language chat site, there are many fake links to a site promising salacious videos. At the end of the links is a smart website which will infect your computer with either a Windows OR a Mac Trojan, as appropriate, and if you go back to it later on will seem perfectly innocuous. These guys are no fools.
The good news is that Download Manager did its work, spotted that the Trojan contain an executable, and refused to complete the download without my permission.
The bad news is that Macs are every bit as vulnerable to buffer over-run exploits in non-executable content (JPEG images, PDF files etc.) as are Windows PCs, which Download Manager won't protect me against. Just look for "privilege escalation" in Apple's documentation for security patches.
The good news is that, being a UNIX user of 25 years standing, I can open a Terminal windows, run ps and look for anything suspicious. You, I suspect, cannot.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
Quote from Sophos: "It embedded itself on friendly looking websites, where an errant click by the Mac user would infect the computer. Once inside the victimâs machine, the Trojan would do the usual nasty thing, sniffing out valuable personal details on the hard drive."
What Sophos failed to mention is that it would not only take an errant click by the Mac user on the infected website to infect the computer, before the computer could be infected, the user would have to supply and Admin User name and password to allow the Trojan to install on the victim's machine.
It is this kind of omission, which is a significant omission, that could help fuel the Mac Community's viewpoint that Sophos is using scare tactics to get people to buy their software.
Note: At least before Vista, it was much easier to get similar types of malicious code on a machine running a Microsoft operating system.
John, Westminster,