Times Online and PA News
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express

Lawyers acting for a 12-year-old Muslim girl have condemned as "irrational" her school’s decision to ban her from wearing a full face veil, arguing that the child’s three sisters were all allowed to do so.
The High Court heard that the girl’s three elder sisters had all attended the same school in the past — two of them under the present headteacher — and had all worn the niqab with no objections from teachers.
The three young women had participated fully in activities and the school was "very supportive of them as devout Muslims and the way they expressed their faith", said Dan Squires, counsel for their sister.
The decision not to allow the youngest girl to wear the niqab was against the principles of rationality, he told Mr Justice Silber.
The girl, referred to only as X — her identity is protected by an anonymity order as is her Buckinghamshire school’s — also argued through her lawyers that the ban went against her "legitimate expectation" that she would be allowed to wear the niqab, and breached her right to freedom of "thought, conscience and religion" under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
She began wearing the niqab last September upon reaching puberty but was told by the school at the start of term that it was not acceptable because teachers believed it would make communication and learning difficult.
The school — a girls’ grammar with an outstanding reputation — has about 1,300 pupils, including 120 Muslims of whom up to 60 wear the hijab headscarf. It is thought that X is the only pupil demanding the right to wear the niqab: a full veil which covers all of the face except the eyes.
Last year the Law Lords ruled that a Luton school was justified in barring Muslim schoolgirl Shabina Begum from wearing a jilbab, a long loose gown, to classes.
The Muslim Council of Britain has said the policy of allowing the hijab headscarf is "quite sufficient to meet Islamic requirements".
The school contesting today’s case has won the backing of The Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, which stresses that not all Muslims agree with the wearing of the niqab.
Mr Squires told the judge that the school’s written policy on uniform over the years made no mention of Muslim dress.
This was because there was an unwritten policy based on "custom and practice" regarding additional clothing which could be worn.
There was no indication that the policy on the niqab would change until the headteacher saw X standing in a lunch queue in early September last year.
According to X’s father, 26 of the teachers at the school had been there when two of his elder daughters were pupils.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think that X should be able to wear the niqab, because if her two older sisters were able to wear their niqabs, she should be able to wear hers. Allah commands that all Muslim women and Muslim men MUST dress approprietly. My Muslim sister should not be having to fight a legal battle in court just so she can wear her niqab! That is ridiculous! What Allah commands us as a Muslim people, we should be able to do what Allah tells us to do!
Shamaat Hassan, Milwaukee , USA/ Wisconsin
I think everyone has the right to practice their belief. There are millions of muslim women who chose to wear the niqab, and have decrees, masters, and phd's. Their schools or universities didn't object their dress code, i don't understand why this school is having a problem with this girl, if they already allowed her sisters to wear it previously. I personally don't see any reason why this young women should not be allowed to wear her niqab. Therefore this is a discrimination, and everyone should have freedom of religion. Everyone chooses their lifestyle, and if she chose this way as her lifestlye, and dresscode why not respect it, and accept it.
um, toronto, canada
Although I personally do not agree to the wearing of the Niquab (i.e. full face cover), I must say if the school's administration had allowed the X's sisters to do so and concluded that the niquab didn't hinder their education, then there is no basis for banning young X from wearing it. However, if it was the case that the niquab was detrimental to their education then I would fully agree with them. The Niquab is not an Islamic obligation on women, and I dislike the use of devout Muslims as a label for those who wear the niquab, since in my view they are not more or less devout Muslims than women who choose to wear the Hijab (i.e. headscarf).
The niquab in my opinion is an extreme interpretation of Islam and I personally do not support it, on the other hand I do support people's right to express their religious beliefs as long as their beliefs do not harm or discriminate against others.
Hassan Mustafa, Newcastle,