David Lister, Scotland Correspondent
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
The operators of the Dounreay nuclear plant in Scotland were yesterday fined £140,000 for dumping radioactive waste at a landfill and releasing nuclear fragments into the sea over a 21-year period.
Sheriff Andrew Berry said that the UK Atomic Energy Authority committed “very grave errors” by illegally dumping waste from the Caithness plant.
The authority pleaded guilty last week to four charges under the Radioactive Substances Act. It admitted one charge of disposing of solid radioactive waste at a landfill site at the plant between 1963 and 1975, and three of allowing nuclear fuel particles to be released through drains into Pentland Firth between 1963 and 1984.
It was fined £40,000 for dumping the waste and £100,000 for releasing the particles. The fine will ultimately be borne by the taxpayer, as the authority is publicly funded.
Wick Sheriff Court was told that six of the particles recovered after escaping from pipes into the sea were considered “very dangerous” and could have been fatal if ingested. Investigators found that the radio-activity of some fragments in a drain was 26 times above the annual permitted dose for a member of the public.
The charges were brought after a lengthy investigation by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. It said that the fine should “serve as a stark warning to operators who disregard pollution laws”.
Dounreay, a former fast reactor research and development centre, was closed in 1994 and is in the process of being decommissioned. More than 1,000 radioactive particles — fragments of spent uranium fuel rods about the size of a grain of sand — have been found on beaches and the sea bed in the surrounding area.
John Crofts, the authority’s director of safety, said: “We accept that mistakes were made and regret those mistakes. We share the view that this is an unacceptable legacy of the Dounreay experiment. Our priority has been and will continue to be to minimise the risk to people and the environment.”
Campbell Gemmell, chief executive of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, said: “This case clearly highlights that pollution is avoidable. This outcome serves as a valuable lesson to UKAEA and others that poor waste management practices will not be tolerated.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think the fine is very too little.
only £140K for the period of 21 years.
how much the company saved by dumping them into nature instead of correct tratment? this is a question to be asked.
Thanks
Mosé, London, UK