Ruth Gledhill
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
Britain’s first Muslim peer yesterday condemned the veil as a “physical barrier to integration” and called for it not to be worn.
Lord Ahmed of Rotherham questioned whether veils were needed in today’s society.
While the Labour peer said that he did not want the face veil, or niqab, he argued that it was introduced originally to guard women against harassment but was now having the opposite effect in Britain.
He told the Yorkshire Post: “The veil is now a mark of separation, segregation and defiance against mainstream British culture.
“But there’s nothing in the Koran to say that the wearing of a niqab is desirable, let alone compulsory. It’s purely cultural. It’s an identity thing which has been misinterpreted.”
The peer said Muslims in Britain must become more sensitive to their surroundings, in the same way as Westerners in Saudi Arabia should wear a head covering.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The Muslims have stricter Dresscode, plain and simple. If they want to wear more clothing then let them, just cause the perves want to see less clothing on women doesn't mean you should create laws or convince muslims to do otherwise.
And this didn't come from traditions, this came from way before Islam was even established.
The old fashoned women from the jewish faith will still cover their hair, the christian nuns, and even the Virgin Mary is portrayed wearing a veil.
If anything, others should follow their role models and be judged by their intellect instead of how HOTTT they are, lol.
Kevin, San Diego, Cali,
I totally agree with Lord Ahmed's view. Few muslims try to create ways as they see fit and then try to associate with Islam. Their act or behaviour cause difficulties and embarrassment to other Muslims unnecessarily. Such Muslims should think as to what are they contributing towards the society they live in and to their religion.
Javaid Iqbal, London, UK
In saying the niqab was "originally introduced to guard women against harassment," and that wearing it is "purely cultural," Britain's first Muslim peer is at odds with Muslim scholars such as Dr. Mohammad Sa'id Ramadan al-Buti who says:-
"Allah, the most high, decreed that the woman should be veiled. He did so in protecting the chastity of the men who might see her, and not in protection of the chastity of the woman from the eyes of those who look at her."
Ela kul Fataten Tu'min be-Allah, Mu'asasat ar_Risalah, Beirut, 1987, Eighth edition, page 98
Nothing here about protecting women is there?
Barry Holroyd, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
He is 100% right.
Lynne, Melbourne, Australia
If the niqab poses a security threat in the UK - as was proved yesterday in the trial of the 21/7 would-be bombers - it must be banned in all public places immediately.
Howard, Derby, UK
Most Muslims appear not to be affiliated to any notion of state or culture and now clearly express their alliegence to Islam and not Britain. This is seen most strikingly when the Muslim religious hierachry, in public, can only muster a whimper in condemnation of the terrorist acts perpetrated in the UK. This is usually expressed as condemnastion but with understanding of why it has happened. In private we have all seen what is being said. There appears to be an inevitability to this process within our society and for very serious conflict to be avoided action must be taken now.
TERRY, ST ALBANS, HERTS