Adam Fresco
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

The Prince of Wales threw his weight into the debate about healthy eating today and told a nutritionist that the “key” was to ban McDonald’s fast food restaurants.
The controversial remarks were made as the Prince was in Abu Dhabi attending the launch of a public health awareness campaign aimed at fighting diabetes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
He visited the Imperial College London Diabetes Centre and watched as a group of children chose from a selection of “good” and “bad” snacks for their school packed lunches.
Talking to Nadine Tayara, a nutritionist from the centre who had put the children through their paces, he asked her: “Have you got anywhere with McDonald’s? Have you tried getting it banned? That’s the key.”
A McDonald’s spokeswoman said Charles’s remark was “disappointing”.
Other members of his family had visited the chain, she said, and “have probably got a more up-to-date picture of us.”
The spokeswoman added: “This appears to be an off-the-cuff remark, in our opinion. It does not reflect our menu or where we are as a business.”
Charles was clearly unaware of some of the moves the company has made, she said, such as improved labelling, supporting sustainable agriculture and nutritional changes with choice and variety.
In August 2005 Prince Harry popped into a McDonald's for a "buy one get one free" meal. He is reported to have bought two chicken burgers and a strawberry milkshake, eating the meal on the pavement outside.
His brother, Prince William, was pictured queuing up for a meal at McDonald’s in January 1992.
A Clarence House spokesman, travelling with the Prince and Duchess on their ten-day tour of the Gulf, later issued a statement.
It said: “The Prince of Wales has for a long time advocated the importance of a balanced diet, especially for children. In visiting the diabetes centre today, he was keen to emphasise the need for children to enjoy the widest variety of food and not to eat any particular sort of food to excess.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I was reading about the town of Tavistock where its citizens drove McDonald's out of business by supporting local eateries which offered far better food:
McDonald's driven out of Devon town by foodies
http://www.slashfood.com/2006/12/08/mcdonalds-driven-out-of-devon-town-by-foodies/?cid=recirc|aol_food
Now I see in the above article that a town in Italy did likewise. Good!
Unfortunately, the situation in the US is a bit different. American suburbs are overrun by corporate food outlets--one serving even worse slop than the other--with little or no other choice.
Christine, Alameda,
It is hardly surprising that McDonald's admin. are upset by Prince Charles' comments. To state that the chain should be banned is a little over the top but he is entitled to his opinion. The food that is served in McDonalds (in my opinion) is more or less disgusting and if I never visited an outlet again it would be a blessing. However, my children are bainwashed into believing dining at McDonald's is a cool thing to do (which is exactly the outcome the company strives to achieve) so I have no doubt they will be taking my money long into the future!
Mike Linley, Harrogate, North Yorkshire
The decision to have a fast food goes better with the individual's choise.Rather his comments makes complication among customers because somebodies likes to have fast food as it goes better with their tastes atevening or afternoon.eating fast can not make person lazy because it totally depends on the type of works they do as always.rather there could be a change among the food catagories they sell to the pupills.furthermore i would echoe the comments made by prince is that pupills shold not have more sweets that ultimately bother them.It does not totally mean that banning first food will not keep people away from eating rather it makes complications among the health because hungry people always hunts for food to survive.
sumon, Dhaka, Bangladesh
This is too delicious. Surely it is now inevitable that there will be eating bans, or designated eating areas well separated from the designated smoking areas of course. All that we can hope for is that Lizzie the dense will outlive Charles the more dense. The Greek bandit must be very proud.
John Lowbridge, Madisonville, Kentucky
McDonalds now has a number of low fat options on its menu. However, even with traditional hamburger and chips, it's a question of moderation and fequency.
The great thing about McDonalds is that it still offers
nourishing meals in a dine out situation at an extraordinarily cheap price which allows low-income
parents to be able take their families out for a meal once in a while as a treat and as a change from dining at home.
Without McDonalds many families would probably never be able to afford to do so. McDonalds is frequently criticised and it's probably mainly the well-off who do most of the
complaining, and who have plenty of other expensive
dining out options. Other good things about McDonalds:
hygenic food preparation; usually visually attactive places which are kept clean; plenty of extras for children such as attractive packaging, cheap toys & safe bright playgrounds;
free newspapers to read. Where else can you get an icecream for 50p? I say: Well done McDonalds!
Joan Moira Peters, (British Citizen, temporarily abroad, administering my late father's
From an expatriate Brit., and more glad of it every day:
The welfare prince passes another of his nugget products of his inbred deficient intelligence. I suppose that when one is bred and conditioned to slurp at excessive will at the public teat one ingests all manner of wisdom with regard to what everyone should to. Is there any hope that the Brits. will awake to the lunatic anachronism of royalty? Good grief. This testament to the depradations of unearned and unwarranted privilege, or his dissipate offspring, could be afforded the power of the throne. It is power, no doubt. How many of the emetically unimaginably wealthy do not seek to exercise political power? Ban the whole crew of them is a superior proposition.
John Lowbridge, Madisonville, Kentucky
But fish&chips is even better?
Sascha, Germany,
To Paul in Scotland:
Not ALL Americans are fat and lazy. Only the ones that chose to be. I have sworn off fast food for 6 years now. Its the PERSONS choice what makes them fat or not. Dont blame restaurants, or Americans. Please keep in mind it is a decision of the individual, and generalized statements such as stereotyping America as being lay-about and lazy. The same could be said about the UK, considering they have to consider BANNING the food to keep people from eating it.
Erin, Greenville, US
As an American, I am embarrassed to see the destruction that the McDonald's Corporation is spreading around the world. Prince Charles has every right to express his opinions about what he cares about. He obviously doesn't eat at fast food restaurants more than once in a great while, if ever. I hope his sons are equally health conscious.
Ruth Brown, Washington, DC USA
Let them eat Cornish pasteys.
H Greeley, Guymon, Oklahoma
Bans don't work. Prohibition of alcohol in the US in the last century showed us. But we could ban ALL ADVERTISING. Nothing on TV. Nothing on radio. Nothing in print media. Nothing on billboards, on race cars. Nothing on the fence in baseball parks. NOTHING ANYWHERE! You could not even put a sign on the stores.
This could work for tobacco also.
Gerald G Maloney, Euless, Texas
This is all well and good.
But, the issue of nutrition (being taken out on McDonalds) is only half the problem. Obesity, both adult and child, which leads to diabetes is also attributable to lack of exercise, prevalant among many "indutrialized nations", or put another way, affluent countries. Shouldn't Prince Charles outlaw CARS?? This would serve three goals: 1. get people exercising, as they'd have to possibly pedal their lazy carcasses to the store or work, or take public transit; 2. it would rapidly cut our greenhouse gas emissions. and 3. it would greatly reduce our dependency on foreign oil. This would be triply more beneficial than just watching diet. And I do that, 200 mi per week bicycle commuting.
How about that, Prince??
Jacques, Rancho cordova, USA California
Banning just McDonald's is too simplistic as is the idea of banning any other fast food chain.
Banning or restricting certain aisles of supermarkets would be a better idea. As would restricting the supply of processed crap masquerading as food.
Kirstie, North Shore, New Zealand
Great news. Behind the ban all the way. The food containers contribute to to much litter and the food is just as good as the rubbish contributes to.I have just had a McDonalds put up at the top of my road, it used to be a clean road, now i would say that McDonalds should be charged adverisement fees as its all you can see. The food is discusting and so is the service. Why ban McDonalds? Why keep it? We dont need fast food, this is just another level of lazyness.
Dan, Dudley, England
Prince Charles is absolutely right, and I am absolutely delighted to see a member of the Royal family not afraid of being politically correct for a good cause he believes in. His "Inconvenient Truths' about obesity or the environment are ones we must all listen to. Good for him.
Ainhoa, London,
Give everyone a coupon for a free blood glucose measurement 2 hours after they've eaten a "healthy" meal at a McDonalds. People need to do a reality check. The fast food industry is in the same league as the cigarette manufacturers.
Tom Claverie, Tilburg,
I have mixed feelings about Charles, especially after his failed marriage to Diana and their subsequent divorce. He is, however, in my view a very well educated, knowledgable and well informed person who like any other Brit has the right to speak out about those things he most deeply cares about.
I personally believe, as an American, that the McDonald's Corporation has done quite enough damage to the health of American citizens without taking their junk food and marketing it to people around the world. I never eat in McDonald's restaurants, and judging by the way Charles looks in his late fifties, neither does he.
Ruth Brown, Washington, DC USA
Prince Charles has got it right. He's been braving negative attacks for years and years by those with self-serving economic agendas to tell it like it is on subjects that concern us all. I really appreciate his efforts to protect people's minds and bodies and the aestheic beauty of the planet.
Mari, New York, USA
Lets ban alcohol, think of the damage that does to society, lets start with ban on Scotch whiskey!
SA, USA
Stewart, LA,
And since it's a soapbox I'm helping to pay for, I'd much rather see him use it than not, whatever his views.
David, Reading,
It's high time someone - anyone - spoke out against the ills that fast foods have begun to generate here in the UK. Do we want our brethren to end up a population of overweight, health-stricken lay-a-bouts as they have in America? Title or no title - I tip my hat to the Prince of Wales for being the first of many that should come forward to address this epidemic in the making!
Paul, Kircukbrightshire, Scotland
Yes I'm sure the changes made to McDonalds food labels vastly improve the nutritional value of the food....what a joke.
McDonalds is not healthy food, but fast food designed for mass profit. Any McDonald's spokesperson who says othewise is either deluded or thinks the general public are stupid enough to believe them.
Whether Prince Charles made an off the cuff remark or not doesn't make his comments any less true.
Jenny, Leeds,
LET THEM EAT CAKE.
Not a thing to lose your head over but quite revolutionary.
Bernard Parke , Guildford,
Let them eat cake !!
Not a subject to lose your head over or though quite revolutionary.
Bernard Parke , Guildford,
A socialist inevitibility. We at the top know what's best for you in the masses. No need to curb or control your own appetites. It is the responsibility of good government to do it for you. No more Mc Donalds, eliminate chips from fish and chips. Put a collar on all the masses, not ourselves of course because we are enlightened, and if less than 1000 steps are taken in a given day you get an electric shock in the ass. This will give a new meaning to the expression.
david, kemah, Texas, USA
Excellent news and timely contribution to this debate - disgusting food, too much litter, horrendous shop fronts, daft uniforms, too many fat people waddling around taking up all the pavement space.
Jon Lord, Manchester,
Rather than ban McDonalds, why not restrict the width of the entrance doors?
Nicky Kingaby, Bristol, UK
This man should keep his views to himself, he is an abject failure at everything he does, and only has a soapbox because he was born with a title.
Ben, London, UK
McDonalds is not food to eat every day granted, but to ban it is excessive and draconian.
Perhaps better to educate people regarding moderation.
This was clearly lacking in the parent/child who is 89kg at aged 8!!!
Simon Smith, London,