Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

When she was 6, Lorna Newman and her friends played in the fields now occupied by the two runways of the world’s busiest airport.
Seventy years on, she can walk only with the help of crutches but she travelled from her home near Heathrow yesterday to take part in the first direct action against the airport’s expansion by people living under the flightpath.
Ms Newman was one of a dozen residents who confronted Douglas Alexander, the Transport Secretary, as he arrived at an airline industry conference at Chatham House, Central London. Several of them managed to storm past security, occupy the stage and interrupt Mr Alexander’s speech.
Ms Newman was unable to make it down the stairs to the hall but she and others took up position at the entrance to catch Mr Alexander as he left. Sadly for them, he was ushered out of a back door and sped away in a waiting car.
John Hunt, of Isleworth, led the charge on to the stage and delivered a speech denouncing the Government’s plans for a third runway at Heathrow before being escorted away by a security guard.
Speaking afterwards, he said that he and many other residents were prepared to risk arrest in their campaign to block the airport’s expansion. “It’s not just the noise from the planes but all the air pollution from the huge amount of traffic attracted by the airport. We are going to force the Government to listen to us.”
Ms Newman said she resented people who believed that Heathrow residents did not deserve sympathy because they had chosen to buy houses close to an airport. “I have lived there since before the airport ever existed. I remember Heathrow as a peaceful little place where the only sound was birds singing. My home has been blighted for 60 years and now they want to rob us of the little bit of respite we get from the worst aircraft noise.”
She was referring to the unwritten agreement by the airport not to allow flights to take off over Cranford, the village at the eastern end of the northern runway where she lives. The Government wants to cancel the agreement, which dates from the 1950s, in order to allow another 60,000 flights a year at Heathrow.
Maggie Thorburn, who has lived in Isleworth for 50 years, said: “We were told Terminal 4 was the very last expansion and then came Terminal 5. When Terminal 5 got planning permission, we were promised that would be it and flight numbers would be capped. Now the Government is backtracking yet again, supporting plans to demolish hundreds of homes to build a third runway. But Mr Alexander should be warned — we have had enough and we are rising up.”
More than 40 residents have attended training sessions organised by Plane Stupid, an antiaviation group that specialises in direct action. The residents are believed to have drawn up plans for disrupting Heathrow if the airport’s expansion wins final approval. One proposal is to use a convoy of cars to block the road tunnels leading to Terminals 1, 2 and 3.
Mr Alexander remained silent while the protesters were in the hall. After they had been removed, he said the Government would ensure that residents were consulted fully about any expansion plans.
Airport history
— The airport is named after the hamlet of Heath Row, where Victorian market gardeners produced fruit and vegetables. Terminal 3 is on the site of the hamlet
— A private airfield was built in the 1930s on land sold by the vicar of Harmondsworth
— Heathrow came under the control of the Ministry of Air in 1944. It opened for civilian use in 1946
— In its first year, Heathrow handled 60,000 passengers
— In 1952 the de Havilland Comet arrived
— BOAC and other long-haul operators moved to the “Oceanic Building”, now Terminal 3, in the 1960s
Source: BAA; Heathrow at 60 by Alan Gallop
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Gordon Brown said that an airport expansion was necessary 1 week after he says that we need to try to cut Britains CO2 emissions by 60% by 2025. This is completely hypocritical and we should all do our bit to help stop airport expansions as a whole as well as trying to reduce our carbon emmisions. An expansion could cause more flooding, more and stronger hurricanes and drought to name just a few disasters predicted.
Sophie, Bristol, UK
We should be cutting air travel not increasing it! England is already prosperous and we do not need another terminal to boost the economy. How can Gordon Brown say we need to cut our carbon emissions as per the climate change bill and then in the next breath add another terminal to heathrow which is likely to increase the number of flights made dramatically?
Julia Jack, Exeter , UK
How expansion of the airports and continued growth in the number of flights can possibly be sustainable? At some point, someone has to say ' Right, that is enough!'. And why shouldn't that point be now? Climate change is happening NOW. Any expansion of any airport is not compatible with reducing CO2 emissons. Allowing expansion to go ahead is not just political suicide, it is suicide full stop.
I feel so sorry for those living near any major airport, suffering the present levels of noise and disruption.
Sekeeta Crowley, enfield, uk
London is the most over flown population in the WORLD. The Government is ignoring the impact on residents and the damage expansion will do to the environment because of pressure from the aviation industry. The economic arguments in favour of expansion are exaggerated. This is simply about the aviation industry making more profit at the expense of the quality of life of people in London ( not just West London) and the damage to the environment.
Enough is enough.
David, London, UK
Expansion of Heathrow is not the solution to added capacity in the South. It is simply the cheapest option for both the tax payer and of course the BAA. Despite improvements in technology Heathrow will continue to be blight to those living within 25 miles of the airport. I have lived around Heathrow almost all my life and when I moved into my current home some 37 years ago there was, by comparison to today very little noise and road congestion. Today it is chaos and airport and road noise unacceptable.
The country needs a new airport reasonably close to London that embraces new technology and building methods. It needs to have good communication by rail and a motorway to London.
If the final go ahead for Heathrow does happen it will simply cause more blight for more people and hardly resolve the real issue which is flight congestion.
Melvyn Simson, Sipson, MIddlesex