Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland

THE minimum age at which foreign nationals can receive marriage visas to enter Britain is to be raised from 18 to 21 in an attempt to crack down on forced marriages, writes David Cracknell.
It will mean that about 3,000 people a year, mainly women from India, will be prevented from coming to the UK. Their intended spouse will also have to be at least 21 for them to be allowed into the country.
The government also intends to introduce confidential interviews for people entering the country who might have been forced into marriage.
Tony Blair will make the announcement as he publishes a 10-year plan this week on crime, security and justice — part of his “legacy” package that he hopes will bind his successor.
The move to raise the minimum age comes after a long campaign by Ann Cryer, Labour MP for Keighley. The government has previously raised the minimum age requirement from 16 to 18, but will now go further.
In Denmark, where the age requirement was raised in 2002 to 24, there was a 27% drop in the number of applications for family reunification in the first six months.
Blair said in December: “We stand emphatically at all times for equality of respect and treatment for all citizens. Sometimes the cultural practice of one group contradicts this . . . A good example is forced marriage. There can be no defence of forced marriage on cultural or any other grounds.”
A Downing Street source said: “The new proposals will take this further, by raising the minimum age of the spouse and sponsor from 18 to 21. This will give more protection against forced marriage, by giving people a greater chance to finish higher education, become more independent, and be able to assert their wishes.”
According to government sources, 18% of marriage visas — 3,000 — issued to people from the Indian sub-continent in 2005 were to people under 21.
The Metropolitan police have called for forced marriage to be made a criminal offence, suggesting a link between the practice and “honour” killings and arguing that it would make prosecutions easier. However, the government has rejected this.
Last year Blair signalled his support for a bill making forced marriage a civil offence, which would mean that victims could sue for damages rather than the offenders being sent to jail.
Blair will also announce this week plans to boost police powers to seize criminal assets. Currently the police can seize cash if they believe it amounts to the proceeds of crime, but not other goods that have been bought with the money.
The policy review will propose allowing police to take goods to the value of £100,000, including “bling” jewellery, plasma television sets and laptops bought by criminals.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
can anyone please let me know when this so called marriage law actualy comes into effect?
debs, leicester, leicestershire
Has everyone forgotten that in this country, the legal age for marriage is 18 or 16 with consent?
Why should it be any different for those marrying someone from outside the country? My girlfriend and I (she is 16) were hoping to marry with her parents' consent, but she is not a british citizen and from the United States. If we did marry, even though the marriage is in line with UK marriage laws, we would not be able to live together in this country as she would be denied a visa. I'm just an average white British guy...if she were a British girl, we'd have no problem.
This problem really needs to be tackled in some other way because it just prevents your average person like me, from marrying the person they want just because he/she is not a British citizen.
If most car theves happened to have brown hair, would we stop all brown haired people from driving cars?
Roger, London, Great Britain
If the wedded couple are both from another country then they should go home and have there family there, not try and bring their culture here in large groups. When are we going to decide that Britain is only big enough for the British and other offshoots of Britain such as Australian? Immigrants such as Eastern Block and Asian should go home not come and improve their own countries not come to The UK and over tax our country's resources, take our children's jobs and claim social security that British would not take out of pride.
When we get a politician who says this policy, the whole country will be behind him or her.
EJB, Poole, Dorset
if any1 knows wen the age limit is to come in force would u plz let me no.much appreciated.
mina, london, uk
I think its a very good idea
khan, london, england/ london
This is unfair to people that are happly married and are looking foward for their other half to come over. 18 year olds are known as adults so i think they are perfectly capable of obligating if they do not want to get married
m, nottingham,
Well westernized or not the choice lies with the individuals. I'm sure most British South Asians are more than capable of making their own life time decisions on who to marry.
The reason for getting a bride from their parents home land ie Pakistan, or south Asia isnt because they want a submissive obedient wife like someone commented. The national statistics of a liberated and westernized generation of females will answer that...Two in five British marriages end in divorce, the highest rate in Europe", and the average number of sexual partners an adult will have in a life time is ten in the UK. (http://www.channel4.com/health).
I believe these statistics dont do justice to the institution of marriage rather they tarnish its purpose! So isnt loyalty more important. The question is in what sort of cultural environment is one most likely to find it? Fortunately traditional values and the sanctity of marriage is still more evident in the subcontinent than in Britain.
mohammed rizwan, OLDHAM, uk
when do this take affect then?
laura, bucks,
You have to respect peoples' right to private and family life. I think you have to assume that adults, i.e. those over 18, are capable of making their own free choices, which include coming to Britain to marry. However, the root right of all human rights is human dignity, which is certainly violated in forced marriages. There should be interviews to assess on a case by case basis whether it is really a forced marriage. A blanket age limit applicable in all cases is a disproprtionate infringement of peoples' rights.
David Kraft, Muenster, Germany (british citizen)
"The complex reasons that underlie the return of the children of minorities to their homeland in order to choose their partners requires to be explored by the people of Britain" -Somnath Mukhopadhyay, Dundee, UK
Why dont the British Chinese, Afro-Carribbean and Continental European communities "import" their brides then? I know why. Because they are perfectly okay with a "westernised" wife who works and is independant. On the contrary, the (South) Asian population is much larger, yet you all want submissive obedient wives who would not question your "authority" hence the import of Indian and Pakistani brides.
Go ahead, deny it.
Pete, Cov,
If a country curtails the rights of its citizens to choose their partners, it ceases to be a free country. The complex reasons that underlie the return of the children of minorities to their homeland in order to choose their partners requires to be explored by the people of Britain. In my opinion, the reasons are perfectly sound and justifiable, and strengthen the framework of modern Britain. However, I support the government's efforts to clamp down on forced marriages which are nasty.
Somnath Mukhopadhyay, Dundee, UK
One of the first actions by Jack Straw as Home Secretary in the first Blair government was to abolish the Prime Purpose rule designed to block marriages arranged solely to enable a spouse usually a man to gain entry into the UK. Mr Straw naively claimed it would affect only 70 marriages a year, look at the numbers now- 15,000 according to this article! Many of these fail and the man is free to bring someone else into the UK.
Never mind an age limit, in some eastern countries the rule is that marriage to someone from the Indian sub-continent requires the local to go and live there.
So how about it? To balance things up lets have 50 years of Asians living or even born in the UK contracting marriages through the family have to go and live back home
Im sure it will have no effect on the practice of arranged marriages as true love will always win through
Teresa Fryer, Birmingham, England
We shouldn't be raising the age to stop forced marriages of Asians in this country. Instead we should be putting a stop to it completely. What would happen if a white anglo saxon family indiginous to this country decided to arrange a forced marriage with an Asian girl or boy. They wouldn't get away with it. Even more relevant, what if we had forced marriages amongst our own indiginous population. Again it wouldn't be allowed to happen. Why are the Asians allowed to get away with it.
michael pickles, bournemouth, England
Why are we allowing minorities to go back to their countries of origin to find marriage partners? If this government was serious about encouraging integration it would have closed this door by now.
Lin, London, UK
This government particularly has made a very grave mistake to allow Indians to use such legal loopholes to their own advantages. Ethnic minorities (particularly Indians) in certain governement positions have used the law for their own benefit on the expenses of later wave of emigrants.
I am in favour of such measures and even tougher ones.
Bajram, London,
So what's wrong with 24, as the Dane's have done?
andrew, swindon,
step by step we might be evolving into a normal country instead of one so supine that only the legitimiate, and those following the rules, live in fear.....but this government has a history of words not needs.
Observer, Peterborough, England
So false imprisonment and rape only apply to those under 21. Fascinating. Let's hope that the East European people -traffickers who force young women into prostitution are not paying attention.
Those involved in this particular area of the livestock market will only be slightly inconvenienced by a three year wait.
Edward Johns, Lannion, France
I just visited my local hospital where my 23 year old married niece delivered a healthy baby girl.In the same ward there was one 13 year old white girl delivered a baby boy last night.She don't know who the father was,are we talking about emancipation of women here?
elias, Dewsbury, West Yorkshire
everything has two different faces
but its a good way extrally....may have a try!
lyn, guangzhou, China
How ironic; on the day that celebrates Wilberforce it is still acceptable in some cultures to force young inexperienced girls to marry; when will those cultures learn that slavery takes many forms and is repugnant in all those forms.
dmt, melbourne, australia
Why not just ban visas entirely for people from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, If British nationals want to marry someone, they can go and live there. The problem will soon disappear.
ed lancey, london,
it is very nice,i m agree to that. im 28years old .
Md.fardous woahid, dhaka, bangladesh