Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor
Win VIP tickets
The world’s largest untapped oil reserves – in northern Canada – have become the new front line in the battle between environmentalists and the energy industry.
Shell, a self-styled “green” energy company, is to invest billions of pounds in exploiting the Athabasca tar sands.
Environmentalists say the tar sands are the world’s dirtiest oil deposits and that refining them generates three to four times more CO2 than normal oil extraction.
However, Clive Mather, chief executive of Shell Canada, said rising demand and surging oil prices could not be resisted. “The deposits are huge, potentially even greater than in Saudi Arabia,” he said. “The time is right to exploit them.”
The Athabasca tar sands are named after the river that runs through them. They contain about 1.7 trillion barrels of oil, of which 175 billion can be reached with existing technologies and another 135 billion could be tapped with technologies under development.
The total of 310 billion barrels would give Canada the world’s largest oil reserves – bigger than Saudi Arabia’s 264 billion.
For western countries, especially America, Canada’s oil is a chance to cut dependence on the Middle East, but the environmental costs could be huge.
This is because tar sands comprise viscous bitumen and sand, a mixture that can currently only be extracted by digging it out, destroying the overlying forests.
The Athabasca region has already been scarred with huge pits, some hundreds of feet deep. Alongside them lie vast ponds that hold the contaminated sands and other residues left after the oil is removed.
Shell, along with Suncor and Syncrude, the other main oil companies in the area, are developing a second extraction method where superheated steam is pumped into the ground to melt the oil so that it can be sucked out as a liquid.
However, both processes, and the subsequent refining, require huge amounts of energy – equivalent to up to 30% of the energy contained in the extracted oil.
Shell and its partners are extracting about 150,000 barrels of oil a day but now want a fivefold expansion to 770,000 barrels. A barrel is roughly equivalent to 35 gallons. Suncor and Syncrude are each planning similar expansions to about 500,000 barrels a day.
This will require so much energy that the oil firms want to lay a pipeline across 800 miles of forest to tap into gas reserves in the Mackenzie river basin, in Canada’s far north. There are also proposals to build a nuclear power station near the tar sands.
Such plans are causing alarm among environmental groups such as Britain’s WWF. It has set up an office in Edmonton, the capital of Alberta, to campaign for restraints on development and improved monitoring.
“Tar sands are the worst kind of source for oil,” said James Leaton, WWF’s policy adviser on gas and oil. “Extracting oil takes huge amounts of energy and devastates the local environment by destroying the forest and polluting rivers, lakes and the air.”
Leaton and other environmentalists contrast Shell’s operations in Canada with the firm’s public relations, which portray it as the greenest of oil companies.
Privately, however, Shell executives make clear that they are simply doing what oil companies are meant to do – extract oil. They say it is the job of governments to regulate the pace.
In Alberta little interference is likely from a state government with a powerful dislike of regulation. Rob Renner, Alberta’s Conservative environment minister, said: “We believe the speed of development is best left to the free market.”
Under Renner the monitoring of industrial pollutants from the tar sands has largely been handed over to the oil companies. One result is that the Athabasca river, and Lake Athabasca, into which it flows, are widely believed to be heavily polluted.
Medical staff at Fort Chi-pewyan, on the shores of the lake, have reported a surge in rare cancers.
The decision to exploit such oils is provoking a political backlash with Arnold Schwarzeneg-ger, the governor of California, effectively banning them. He has issued a fuel standard demanding a cut in “carbon intensity”, a measure of the CO2 generated in producing and using them.
Ten other American states and the European Commission are considering similar measures.
The reserves
Confirmed reserves of top 10 countries in billion barrels
264bn Saudi Arabia
175bn Canada
133bn Iran
115bn Iraq
102bn Kuwait
98bn United Arab Emirates
80bn Venezuela
60bn Russia
39bn Libya
36bn Nigeria
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The Arctic is warming nearly twice as fast as the rest of the planet and the Inuit people are already facing dramatic changes because of climate change -- is there no end to the industrialised world's greed for oil and destruction?
More oil -- and particular "dirty oil" will contribute even more to increased carbon emmissions and climate change.
pippa , Maidstone, England
If you're including non-traditional sources of oil that can be extracted using current technologies, Venezuela has apx. 1200 billion barrels available, when Orinoco tar sands are included. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves
K.C. Hunsaker, San Diego CA, USA
We need to think over its side-effects also. Big countries like USA should make modifications in their consumer model and encourage people to use renewable sources of energy. There is no way that these resources can satisfy the day to day increasing energy demands.
Danish Ahmed, Denmark,
Oil sands are 'black gold'. With the oil prices swaying between $55-$70, they offer a good IRR. There are also opportunities to invest in the technologies which will ultimately be helpful in overcoming the emmisions/pollution problem. Hence the investment in tapping this vast recource of energy should not be stopped.
Rachit Agarwal, Gurgaon, India
well there is no way other than oil in tar sands for future needs
satish, chennai , tamil nadu
Since the Arctic Ocean Commons seafloor has been explored with much less sophistication than the rest of the earth's surface area, and because its geologic characteristics and recently discovered two-mile thick, organic rich sedimentary sections, with attendant oil and gas shows, suggest a strong possibility of viable hydrocarbon deposits, there is a good chance that one or more super-giant oil and gas fields lie somewhere beneath the Arctic Ocean Commons floor. (please see: www.unoilgas.com)
EWTL, London, London
The claimed size of reserves, besides being very questionable in some cases, is not the most relevant factor. Saudi Arabia at its peak produce 9.5 million barrels of oil a day which has now fallen to 8.5 million barrels a day. It claims it could produce 10.5 million barrels a day if it chose. Some believe this claim and others do not. Most of their oil comes from very old fields in decline.
The Canadian Tar sands are now producing a little over 1 million barrels a day, little more than they did two years ago, despite huge investment. Realistic estimates are that after further huge investment this will increase only to 2 million barrels a day by 2015 and peak at about 3 million barrels a day in about 2025 as all the projects compete for the same resources. By then conventional oil production, now at about 85 million barrels a day will have will declines by far more than this.
Realistically achievable production rates are far more important in reaching or failing to reach demand.
Nick Rouse, Plumpton green, UK
Your article conveniently fails to mention the fact that Albertas energy sector is indeed regulated by the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (http://www.eub.gov.ab.ca).
While government ministers come and go the EUB has been independently serving Albertans for almost 80 years in one form or another.
Unknown Source, Calgary, AB
This massive resource, whether environmentalists like it or not, needs to be extracted to keep the global economic engine running. We can't switch to green sources immediately, and other sources of oil are running out.
I live in Alberta, I don't mind if the NE part of our province is scoured by machinery. We have more than enough pristine wilderness in Canada as it is.
Dustin, Calgary, AB Canada
@Rod: economic development really happens at any cost if you're the boss, huh?
I like this one: "the monitoring of industrial pollutants from the tar sands has largely been handed over to the oil companies", it's like telling dope addicts they can regulate their own drug use.
Never in the history of self-regulation has any company done anything else than take care of it's own profits to the detriment of anything else.
Hey Rod, if everybody gets to pollute as much as they like, will you enjoy breathing the delightful bitter stench of burning tar or are you going to whine about the quality of air and how shameful it is that nobody's doing anything about it?
Here's a suggestion: if Shell is so adamant that they want to drill there, government should demand that the executives and their families live on the plot while they're exploiting it. Let's see how well that one would go down.
Frances, Brussels, Belgium
The price of petrol in the US will remain high. Until the US decides not to take it anymore. The last completely brand new petrochemical refinery built in the US, was when Eisenhower was President.
As long as we maintain the attitude that we want pay some one else for something that we already have, but we are not willing to work and cultivate ourselves, then we will pay and pay and pay...
Eric Coleman, Houston, Texas
why not tell Britains WWF group to go home and we will look after our own affairs
Rod, Grande Prairie, AB Canada