Greg Hurst and Christine Buckley
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
A new generation of nuclear power stations will move closer today as the Government unveils plans to guarantee Britain’s future energy supply.
Writing in The Times, Tony Blair confirms the Government’s view that nuclear power must be part of Britain's future energy market, alongside an expansion of renewable energy.
“It is only right that we consider how nuclear power can help underpin the security of our energy supply without increasing our reliance on fossil fuels,” Mr Blair writes.
The Prime Minister presents the move as a vital step in cutting carbon emissions from traditional fossil fuels to tackle climate change, and necessary to protect Britain’s energy supplies as North Sea oil and gas runs out.
But it will provoke fierce protests from environmentalists, and some dissent within the Labour party, as critics question whether the nuclear industry could meet all the costs and highlight risks posed from disposing of nuclear waste.
The Times can reveal that work has already begun to license new nuclear power stations, even though ministers have been forced to begin another consultation on the decision alongside an Energy White Paper setting out the Government’s preliminary view.
The Health and Safety Executive, a Government agency, has received one formal application for the design of a nuclear station already and three other expressions of interest submitted for three other designs.
The move by the HSE to carry out “preparatory work” on licences is likely to provoke fresh accusations that ministers are determined to press ahead with new nuclear power plants regardless of objections or alternative views.
A new consultation process was forced on them after Greenpeace, the environmental pressure group, won a court challenge to the Government in February, claiming its initial consultation on energy policy was seriously flawed.
Despite this embarrassment, the White Paper will make clear the Government’s view that new nuclear power stations should be part of Britain’s energy supply market for the next generation.
Alistair Darling, the Trade Secretary, will not say how many new nuclear power plants are envisaged by the Government, saying it will be for power companies to come forward with plans. He has said fewer will be needed than at present, as new stations will be more efficient.
Neither will he say what proportion of Britain’s future energy supply should come from nuclear power, although he will recommit the Government to a target that, by 2020, a fifth of electricity should be from renewable sources.
There will be moves to encourage low carbon technologies, such as “clean” coal and gas power stations, regulations to phase out products that use energy inefficiently, such as standard light bulbs, by 2011, and encouragement for energy efficient homes and biofuels and hybrid cars.
The HSE has organised a group of people to assess the “licenceability” of the approaches made to it, effectively looking at whether they pass the first stage and should go on to be considered fully.
Some power companies such as EDF and E.On have been pushing for action to make the process as quick as possible after the final decision has been taken.
The HSE only has jurisdiction over the design and safety and no authority over planning issues. Its deliberations can take up to 3½ years depending on the issues it has to consider.
A spokesman for the HSE said the length of time and the uncertainty over the number of applications led to the decision to begin preliminary work now.
The Department of Trade and Industry asked the HSE to look at “prelicensing” when it launched its energy review last year. But the decision to go ahead despite the successful Greenpeace legal challenge is likely to be controversial.
A spokesman for the HSE said: “We are not prejudging, but if the decision goes the way that most people assume that it will, we will be able to move forward quickly.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
While nuclear safety regulation might sound like a public service, ensuring safety requirements in the public interest, regulators are inherently there to advise the industry on everything from the quality of design to health and safety of personnel. Any new wave of building would require major investment in regulatory authorities (such as the Health and Safety Executive and Environment Agency), to attract the necessary numbers and expertise.
Trade & Industry secretary Alistair Darling asserted in the House of Commons lunchtime on 23 May when he unveiled the Government's nuclear plans that :"it will be for the private sector to initiate, fund, construct and operate new nuclear plants, and to cover the cost of decommissioning and their full share of the costs of long-term waste management costs."
If this is to prove an accurate promise, ministers must make clear how they will forthwith apply full cost recovery from private sector nuclear operators for all the costs incurred.
Dr David Lowry, Stoneleigh, Surrey
Greenpeace sound like my wife. No - you can't have nuclear, you can't have a tidal barrage, you can't have that wind farm, you can't fly, you can't drive. Off that light and don't throw that away. Can I just be left in peace from Greenpeace ?
Prav, london,
Whether people like it or loathe it, you cannot dismiss the fact that nuclear power plays a crutial part in the stability of the power consumption that this country uses. It's always nice to go home and turn your light switch on and know that there is going to be power there when you need it. Remove nuclear, stick thousands of windmills around the country and hope that there is going to be enough wind to generate that electricity that we need and that might work, or just keep using gas and coal until it runs out, and then what?
Never mind, after the greens have had a hard day campaigning to remove nuclear they can always go home cook their tea and turn on the tv to see what they accomplished that day by using the electricity that was generated by nuclear power.
John McDougall, Tranent, East lothian
No doubt all the new power stations will be built in England. Planning is a devolved issue and the Scots and the Welsh have already said that they will not allow any more nuclear facilities to be built on their soil. ALSO, The Scots have said that they have agreed that all the existing nuclear waste that is in Scotland is going to be taken down south to be buried in England. They have also said they look forward to cheap power thanks to the new stations. Looks like England is yet again left to pick up the dirty tab for everyone else.
Allistair Darling must be pleased. Ni nukes for his constituents then? Remind me again, we live in a democracy don't we? If only we had a first minister looking out for our interests like the Scots and the Welsh do.
If only.
Alfred the OK, Lancashire, ENGLAND
Perhaps Darling is right to disparage the anti-nuclear lobby. I would suggest that more people have died in the grim environment of the coal face (and still do) than in all the incidents, bombs and accidents attributed to nuclear energy. What the lobbyists have achieved with their campaigning is to ensure that the adoption of nuclear power production has been made more dangerous by their actions, pressuring the British Government to downgrade its training of technicians with an interest in working in a nuclear generation industry and by limiting research opportunities with specious arguments. If countries such as Britain, with a good record in the field of peaceful usage of nuclear energy, are denied the opportunity to investigate this energy source two things will happen: the much sought after answers to certain ligimate questions over the process will be delayed and global warming may come exist. Receiving, daily, nuclear derived energy from France does not provoke protest, why?
Malcolm Turner, Alsager, England
My concern is Microgeration on the UK's 28 million homes and 6 million businesses doesn't figure in Blairs front line thinking and his super sub central fix it solution is the nuclear option!
Where will the nuclear waste be disposed of, what cost and are future U238 ore supplies fron Canada, Australia and the Congo secure and sustainable (50years supply or less if other countries press the same nuclear direction and demand)?
Rob Whittle, London, UK
Mr Blairs statement It is only right that we consider how nuclear power can help underpin the security of our energy supply without increasing our reliance on fossil fuels, is correct and we will have to build nuclear plants as there is no viable alternative at the moment. What he misses out is that these plants will be owned by French and German companies and so we will still have a security with the supply of energy.
We need to have an open debate and discussion of what we wish to achieve in the next 30 years or so without misinformation on either side.
Joseph Kellie, Edinburgh, Scotland
You can't keep the environmetal lobby happy. There will be issues and challenges with every solution to reducing our contiribution to climate change. What we need is to unite behind strong leadership and implement pragmatic solutions. If Greenpeace needs to decide what it's policy is. If they are not going to help with the solution then they should stop lobbying on climate change in the first place.
Oliver, Poole, Dorset