Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
Manchester will unveil tomorrow a £3 billion plan to become the first place in Britain to charge drivers for the distance they travel on congested roads.
Everyone who drives into the city centre will have to pay a deposit for an electric tag which must be placed inside the windscreen.
The tag will be read from roadside gantries positioned along the 15 main routes into the city centre, with payment deducted as drivers pass under them. Initially, there will be two charging points on each route and drivers passing both points will pay about £6. The total revenue from the scheme is expected to be £118 million a year. Drivers who try to avoid paying will be caught by cameras similar to those that enforce the Central London congestion charge.
Unlike in London, however, drivers will not pay a flat rate for entering a zone. They will pay only at the most congested times of day and those leaving the city centre in the morning, in the opposite direction to the bulk of traffic, will not pay.
Manchester also plans to test satellite-based charging technology that would allow the scheme to move to a second stage in which drivers would pay for precisely the number of miles they travel.
Sir Richard Leese, leader of Manchester City Council, told the Commons Transport Select Committee yesterday that the charging scheme would be preceded by “the biggest public transport programme ever attempted in this country”.
The £3 billion proposal, to be submitted to the Department for Transport in July, will include extending the city’s tram network and a big increase in the number of buses and trains.
Manchester will seek £1 billion from the Government’s Transport Innovation Fund and it plans to borrow a further £2 billion, which will be repaid by income from road charging and the extra collected in fares.
Sir Richard said that the scheme, which Manchester hopes to introduce in 2012, could be a model for road-user charging across Britain.
He said that the public transport improvements would help to persuade the public to support the scheme, despite the 1.8 million-signature petition against road charging on the Downing Street website.
When people in Manchester were asked if they would support road charging if all the profit were invested in transport, 54 per cent said “yes”.
A study by local authorities in Greater Manchester found that if they failed to introduce road charging, they would lose 30,000 jobs that would have been created otherwise over the next decade.
The West Midlands is also considering submitting a bid to the Government but there is much less local political support for road charging.
Geoff Inskip, chief executive of the West Midlands Passenger Transport Authority, which comprises councillors from seven local authorities, said that there was also less support among the public for road charging in the West Midlands than there was in Manchester.
The Government is claiming to be neutral about which city becomes the first to introduce road-user charging, but the Department for Transport is understood to favour Manchester strongly.
Graham Stringer, Labour MP for Manchester Blackley and a member of the Transport Committee, accused the Government of blackmailing the city into introducing road charging by refusing to fund public transport improvements unless the local authorities introduced a charging scheme.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We have road pricing already: road tax, VAT etc. The discussion should focus on whether this is the best form of pricing ie should driving 5 miles through rural Lincolnshire cost the same as driving 5 miles through a major city in the rush hour?
Well, should it?
Paul Randall, Chichester,
I don't suppose this would replace the road tax? NOT!
My wife just renewed her private plate, CDN$220 one off fee, for the meagre cost of CDN$70.54. Oh that's £100 for the plate and £30 for yearly licensing. What is the British public doing about these obscene stealth taxes, for crying out loud stand up for yourselves or leave. Yes weâre so glad not to be there, the UK is in tatters.
Ex Pat, St Albert, Canada
Im all in favour - especially if the money raised through the charging is put back into improving the public transport
Anthony Payne, Manchester, manchester
I thought this was suppose to be a democracy, I certainly haven't been asked!
They say they will make around 118 million pounds a year. Will I bet that half of that if not more will be lost in 'admin' charges and paying a massive army of civil service personnel to sit around in and office all day designing forms and having meetings about meetings!
If the money made isn't going to improve and more importantly clean up public transport then whats the point? Your paying your fees for nothing!
Kenneth is also completely right, the city centre will become a desert, a barron wasteland inhabitated by the odd Starbucks!
Also someone answer me this; if you never had 30,000 jobs in the first place then how is it possible to lose them?
james, Manchester,
Is this the end for annual road tax? If so, then it would be a good idea. You pay for what you get. With all the money going back into the coffers, the roads will be maintained. I support it whole heartedly.
dachaidh, rhu, scotland
Why charge the public more for doing the essential longer journeys which are not covered by reliable and cost effective tansport schemes. It is the shorter more avoidable journeys causing the snarl ups (school runs etc). Most people will be aware of the ease of travel and lack of congestion when the schools are closed. Road pricing will not solve congestion, it will just eventually price the poorer workers of the road and ultimatley out of work. Basically this will be the repacement for the lost revenue when we are all driving electric or more fuel efficient cars. It is aso interesting to note that some of the companies behind the road pricing technology are companies like Haliburton.
Malcolm, Durham, UK
"When people in Manchester were asked if they would support road charging if all the profit were invested in transport, 54 per cent said âyesâ."
Spending money on public transport is really easy. I notice they didn't ask how many people would be in favour of congestion charging if spending the money on public transport didn't produce any improvements. Maybe they should ask that?
Katie, Cambridge,
To Ken Armitage - 'what will happen when shoppers move to outlying towns?' - Simple, the Ring of Steel you refer to will be widened to encompass arterial routes into those smaller towns too! Of course the Dept of Transport favour Manchester not Birmingham - Manchester's Councillors are willing to create fictional families, model's photogrpahs, do away with genuine consultation and invent fictional support to force the scheme through. If they had have sought genuine views, they would have been at risk of interviewing one or two of the 1.8M who signed the petition. So can we also assume that the figure of 30,000 job losses is also made up, falsified and fabricated? Given the lies, dishonesty and insult created through the publicity meant to prove the benefits, let us see where the 30,000 job losses actually come from. Projected building workers and jobs to be created for the overseeing admin staff for the scheme = 30,000. People not offered jobs if the proposal rejected? Err, 30,000?
NRC, Oldham, UK
This road charging will be unfair.
The people must have a say via a referendum, and to deny that would be a public insult.
It will be as unpopular as the poll tax and damage labour politicians in Manchester and get them kicked out of office.
A political suicide note!
ALLAN GRIFFITHS, MANCHESTER,
An interesting move by Manchester City council, it will be interesting to see the response of the major store owners to this road pricing scheme. Since the City will be surrounded by a 360 degree 'ring of steel' of road charging systems I wonder what will happen to the numerous large department stores as well as the many other clothing, jewellery and shoe shops in the Arndale Centre when the hundreds of thousands who live in the suburbs of Manchester and usually shop there, and especially at the weekend, decide not to travel in to Manchester and instead drive to the surrounding towns of Bolton, Bury, Rochdale, Oldham, Stockport, Middleton and Wigan and the huge shopping Trafford centre to do their shopping? And, if the department stores are obliged to reduce costs and overheads and thousands lose their jobs then what will happen?
Kenneth Armitage, Suffolk, England
It would seem to be a good time to move away from Manchester
Philip Walton , Wigan,