Steven Swinford and Robert Booth
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
THE Prince of Wales has been found wanting in his efforts to save the world from global warming. Charles and his royal household have generated more than 1,500 tons of carbon dioxide in the past year, according to an independent audit.
The prince will this week announce that he and his household are carbon neutral – but campaigners claim this is “greenwash” because, instead of cutting his emissions, he is simply paying to offset them.
Also, it does not include holidays taken by his sons, Princes William and Harry. William spent a week in Barbados with his former girlfriend, Kate Middleton, and flew to Switzerland and Ibiza, and Harry enjoyed two trips to Barbados with his girlfriend, Chelsy Davy, and a trip to South Africa.
On Tuesday Charles will publish details of his carbon footprint for the past year and targets to reduce it. The audit has been conducted by Jonathon Porritt, his long-standing adviser.
However, an independent audit, conducted for The Sunday Times by Chris Goodall, the author of How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, found that the prince’s lavish lifestyle had taken its toll on the planet.
Goodall made use of publicly available records to estimate the prince’s travel and utility bills. He found that Charles was responsible for nearly 1,600 tons of CO2 emissions, the equivalent of more than 600 cars on Britain’s roads for a year.
Flights taken by Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall generated more than 800 . They flew more tons of CO2 than 70,000 miles last year, including frequent visits to Scotland and tours of the United States, the Gulf, Pakistan and Africa.
The prince’s foreign air travel has been controversial. In January he travelled first class to the United States with Camilla and 14 aides, where he picked up an environmental awareness award. The two-day tour cost up to £120,000 and generated 54 tons of CO2 In February he hired an Airbus A319, which can seat 140 people, to carry him, Camilla and 23 aides to the Gulf at taxpayers’ expense. The tour, which generated 380 tons of CO2 four press advisers, an equerry, a dresser for the duchess, a hairdresser, two valets, a butler, a doctor, three staff in charge of logistics and travel, and a personal assistant.
One former senior member of the royal household said the prince’s entourage was often excessive: “Simple actions that could be done by one man seem to take three when the prince is involved.”
In May Camilla dented the prince’s green reputation when she took a private jet to Greece for a short break with friends.
Graham Thompson, of Plane Stupid, a green pressure group, said: “The number of air miles is unacceptable and seriously undermines his claim to be the ‘green prince’. It is a blow to those of us making genuine efforts to live a greener lifestyle.”
The audit also examined carbon emissions of Charles’s three homes: Clarence House, Highgrove in Gloucestershire and Birkhall in Scotland. Utility bills for the three came to more than £100,000 in 2005-6, with heat and lighting producing more than 600 tons of carbon dioxide, equivalent to the emissions of 500 houses.
Assuming three-quarters of the staff commuted the UK average of nearly nine miles each way, these journeys generated 78 tons.
The prince offsets carbon emissions from his homes and UK flights with Climate Care, which invests in sustainable projects such as wind turbines in India and cleaner cooking stoves in Honduras. Foreign flights are expected to be offset as part of a government fund later this year.
Clarence House said: “Official overseas tours are taken at the request . . . of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office . . . consequently our emissions are largely dictated in this regard by the government.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Well, the Prince seems to be taking the same path as Al Bore, the high priest of the Greenhouse Movement - talk big, talk green, go right ahead and do whatever you feel like and then lie about it !
If hypocrisy works well, massive hypocrisy works better !!!
Gary, Sydney, Australia
Ummm...Don't they mean Carbon Monoxide (CO1) which is what is emitted via exhaust, instead of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) which is what a person breathes out and what plants take in?
Eric, Queen Creek,
It is not mentioned that his supposedly 'controversial' trip to the States in January was on a scheduled flight and so produced no extra carbon emissions as the flight would have flown without him. Indeed arguably by taking an entourage of 14 he lowered every pwrson's individual carbon footprint on that flight. + Any unbiased 'former senior member of the royal household' would know that Prince Charles is obliged by the government to travel with a doctor and a minimum of 4 security staff for health and security reasons, just as the Queen and any Prime Minister is. Ms Lush might also like to know that the prince has already held several video conference meetings and has been enjoying holidays in Scotland, the Lake District and Cornwall for over 30 years. I'm sure he would be delighted to promote better train links across the UK, but some of the places he visits eg the Shetland Isles aren't exactly reachable by train!!
Ms. B. Brooke, Merseyside,
The awareness and intent of the Royals will influence so many that the accounting on the final net result of CO2 reduction should be hugh. If they did not speak out for "green" others would dismiss the issue as unimportant, since they have its not right to be critical of the short term cost of long term gains in the minds of the public.
Richard, iowa, usa
If it wasn't for CO2 - the earth wouldn't be green in the first place. People don't generally realize it but the earth's natural processes produce more than 5 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide in excess of all of the CO2 that that plants photosynthesize back into oxygen each year.
One little question occurs to me: on those clear - starry evenings when gentlemen remove their jackets to put over the chilly shoulders of their ladies, shouldn't all that CO2 be keeping the air warm?
L Dishman, Detroit, Michigan
The authors simply fail to understand that the carbon dioxide emissions of people with money is different than the emissions of common folk in that the moneyed folk can make theirs disappear merely by ignoring them.Common folk,on the other hand ,will have to be taxed heavily to make theirs not appear in the first place.
ron, toronto,
A good bit to go before his carbon footprint rivals that of Al Gore then!
A. Robertson, Edinburgh,
"It is a blow to those of us making genuine efforts to live a greener lifestyle.â
I would have thought that the number of coal fired power stations that the Chinese are building would be a bigger blow.
Perhaps its not as fashionable to give the Chinese a hard time?
Neil McAlester, Belfast, N. Ireland
Run! This 'giant CO2' molecule will crush us all and instantly boil the planet. ;-)
Ben, York,
According to the Stern Report, the measures necessary to hold global warming to 2 degrees would amount to 0.1% of GDP per annum to 2100. I don't see why HRH should put on a hair shirt and live in a tool shed. The article Fred Marconi is commenting on explicitly says HRH is publishing the measures he is taking to reduce his princely carbon emissions and has offset most of these. Doing as he does would be a very good start for all of us.
As for carbon offsets being thoroughly discredited, as Rebecca Lush contends, this is simply untrue. It is a young market and caveat emptor applies even more than it would in a mature market, but I have offset several years of carbon emissions through one of the accredited not-for-profit organizations. There are good offsets, and there are bad offsets. You have to shop wisely.
I expect HRH gets plenty of advice.
Brant Boucher, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Can we find even ONE of these hypocritical morons who practice what they preach? Algore, the Prince, and on and on....one set of rules for me--one set of rules for thee.
The bottom line is that these people worship their Mother Earth, and they want everyone else to do so as well. To that end, they talk a good talk, but their walk is b.s.
Bob Thompson, Prescott Valley, USA/AZ
when will people stop worrying about CO2? so called global warming is caused by sun activity this in turn creates more CO2 through nature.
david james, gosport, uk
The earth will certainly survive. No question at all about it. There won't be any people, but the planet will heal itself, after all the parasites, all of us, have disappeared. Just imagine, it will be gorgeous. Oh yes, there will also be lots of insects. The bees and the butterflies and the beetles will love it! They can hardly wait! Cheers!
Mom, San Francisco, California
Just another do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do hypocrite like the government ministers, Bono and all the rest.
Fred Marconi, Birmingham,
Carbon offsetting has been thoroughly discredited as a way to deal with the carbon you emit. The only genuine way to reduce carbon is not to produce it yourself in the first place, rather than paying companies to pretend they made it disappear for you! Prince Charles should lead the way as a pioneer of video conferencing for his official engagements, join he lobby for better train links to Scotland, and promote British tourism by taking his holidays here.
Rebecca Lush, London, UK