Robert Booth
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The Queen may charge visitors £10 to watch the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace as she ponders emergency measures to meet her repair bills.
The ceremony, whose origins date back to the Restoration in 1660, is one of the capital’s most famous free attractions, drawing 4,000 onlookers on a typical summer’s day.
The plan has been drawn up by senior royal aides after the government refused a request for an extra £1m a year to help fund urgent repairs to the crumbling palaces.
Each weekday morning at 11.30am, tourists gather outside Buckingham Palace to peer through the railings at the changing of the guard.
The military pomp of the changing of the Queen’s Guard is accompanied by a Guards band wearing bright red tunics and bearskins playing traditional military marches, songs from West End shows and sometimes pop music.
If they have operational commitments, other infantry units take part instead.
The ceremony is held daily from April to July and on alternate dates throughout the rest of the year.
If an average of 200 visitors per day pay £10 to be admitted within the palace forecourt they would generate around £500,000 a year. “We could let paying visitors onto the forecourt to get the best view,” said a senior aide.
The proposal would, however, mark a new intrusion into the privacy of the royal family. Although fee-paying visitors have been admitted to the state rooms at Buckingham Palace since 1993 – adults are charged £15 – tours take place only while the royals are not in residence.
Other money-making schemes being considered include charging admission to the Buckingham Palace gardens, currently accessible only to people with a coveted invitation to one of the Queen’s garden parties, and offering tours of the royal kitchens.
Courtiers say the schemes are a last resort, with one admitting: “There is a real danger that the palace starts to become like a theme park.” He added: “But all the dignified options have already been taken.”
Courtiers, however, charged with maintaining the fabric of the palaces, are adamant that matters are coming to a head. Earlier this year a lump of masonry the size of a shoebox fell from the facade of Buckingham Palace, narrowly missing the Princess Royal’s parked car.
The glass roof of the Buckingham Palace picture gallery is leaking, posing a threat to the priceless collection hanging there, which includes works by Rembrandt. The gallery’s silk walls have already been stained by water dripping through, and the cost of repairs is estimated at £1.8m.
The eastern facade of the main quadrangle is crumbling and requires a £3m repair, and two-thirds of the lead, slate and copper roof is due for replacement over the next decade at a cost of £750,000 a year.
Works to rewire Buckingham Palace for the first time in 40 years and to clean the Bath stone facades of the quadrangle, which have turned a discoloured orange, are on hold.
The Queen is also facing a £6m bill to replace an expanse of the roof at Windsor Castle equivalent to the area of Centre Court and No 1 Court at Wimbledon. At Frogmore, in the grounds of Home Park at Windsor, parts of the ceiling of Victoria and Albert’s mausoleum have fallen in.
Officials are bemused by the apparent indifference of the Treasury to their plight. Their attempts to secure extra funding have been rebuffed for more than two years, and they are resigned to an even cooler response under Gordon Brown’s premiership. One senior courtier said: “We are deeply frustrated.”
For the second year running the Palace has submitted a request for a budget increase of £1m to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
The Queen’s aides have been told it is unlikely to be agreed because funds have been diverted to the Olympics. The budget for its sporting venues has risen by almost £1 billion since it was awarded the games in 2005.
“If the money doesn’t come through, we will have to look at other options,” said a spokeswoman for the Queen.
Lord St John of Fawsley, a constitutional expert, described the idea as “absolutely repellent”. He said:“We need to keep up our appearances as a nation. The government should assume its responsibility and pay for the repairs to the palace. We are one of the richest countries in the world and these buildings belong to the nation.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
the royals cost us 62 pence per year...a small sum for the return they give this country via tourists.....its always easy to knock the royals...but hand money out left right and centre to every foreigner or crackpot who asks or demands it......its a disgrace as the palaces are part of british heritage ..but then again perhaps thats what ive just said..part of our heritage which some seem bent on destroying....stop sending money abroad and look after the uk....just for a change ...more is spent in the uk every year on rubbish..so people dont have much to moan about.....pay up and save part of england.....or are you all so far past caring for your own country????
peter worby, luton, england
That will be fine, if the royal family also pay the guards' wages
Simon Bee, Wokingham, UK
The British monarchy is cost effective. The yearly budget is more than 50% below what the French pay for their republican head of state. Taking the elections into account, it is even cheaper. Does anybody think President Bush pays a cent for the keeping the White House or his various "summer resorts" in good shape? The French would laugh, would anyone demand President Sarkozy to be responsible for repair work in the Elysee Palace. Republicans are ignorant, when they think replacing the Queen with a president would save a penny. To the contrary: The British taxpayer would pay much more.
Harold, Melbourne, Australia
Perhaps Charles should help out as he did get a nice increase last year...
S Hon, London,
The Queen's got enough money to pay for the repairs herself, you don't find other wealthy home owner asking for the government to pay for their upkeep. If she's so poor let her sell something. She already gets £37million from UK tax payers each year to have a good time, and her family avoid inheritance tax. How much more does she want?
Jax, Notts, UK
Why is the crwon responsible for so many places anyway? Maybe its time they cut down the number of houses. Buck House, Sandringham and Balmoral are surely enough for anyone? hand the rest to the national trust. Some of the art treasures can go to the national and regional galleries. The pomp and circumstance of the monarchy is a necessary part of it, but it doesn't have to be quite so vast does it?
Neil Murphy, cromer,
How about the 'dignified option' of HM The Queen paying for her own home's upkeep out of her own private fortune which has been amassed, over centuries, by royal possession of properties throughout Great Britain and real estate holdings in the United States (she owns large tracts of Madison Avenue, one of the most presitgious land masses in the USA)?
It is particularly disgraceful of the Sovereign to turn the daily military procedures of The Foot Guards (the Royal bodyguard) into a money-spinning exercise: such action will denigrate the inherently professional, military duties of those who have sworn to lay down their lives for their Sovereign and Country. That "Changing of the Guard" is not a vaudevillian turn: it is part of the core of military discipline and drill which helps to form the ethos of a fighting soldier.
Kate, london,
The sooner we rid ourselves of this useless monarchy, the better!
A H Sargeant, CHATTERIS, Cambs.
NO, NO, NO !
How much is the queen and the rest of the royal family worth ? Let them pay for their own house repairs.
Like wot I do.
They could always move to a council flat.
M Newman, Watford,
Yes you are one of the richest countrys in the world .But only by the (Sweat and Blood ) of the British.
Mabel, OKLA, U.S.A
These beautiful buildings are the nations heritage and should be paid for by the government. If you remember how much cash was poured into The millenium dome, (a building which has barely been used for the last 6 years and who's roof has a life of about 75 years) how can it be questioned that funds not be spent on these buildings which house priceless treasures. This is a disgrace.
Sarah , Ilford, Essex
The Queen should give up the civil list and instead take the income from the Crown Estates, rather than giving it to the goverment. She would then have much more money to maintain the palaces.
Anthony, London,
Why on earth should I , a supermarket worker on £5.70 an hour, help pay for one of the richest woman in the world to live in luxury?
For Lord Fawsley to justify the government forking out for the palace's repairs as it 'belongs to the nation' is a complete affront to every taxpayer in the land.
Since when has 'the nation', and not just the privileged few, been able to enjoy the oppulence and splendour of the Royal residences?
If The Queen needs cash, she can look a little closer to home in the Duchy of Lancaster.
William Taylor, Lincoln, UK
Off with her head!
Henry Adams, Manchester,
Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle make a huge indirect contribution to the nation's economy - by being two of our biggest attractions. They give vistors even more reason to visit the UK, with ramifications beyond the revenue earnt at the two venues.
While two buildings with national importance are crumbling more and more money is being diverted into the Olympic blackhole. The £400k wasted on that stupid logo would have been better spent on either building. Between the Treasury and the Lottery the money should have been found.
I once took an oath to the Queen, and despite being neither elected nor rising to her position through talent I have far greater respect and a greater sense of affection than for many of our elected "representatives"
David, Norwich, England
has Her Majesty forgotten that we pay for these guards? What a tacky idea.
the woman is hardly poverty-stricken - let her pay for her house repairs like the rest of us have to.
mac jordan, bristol, uk
They should sell one of their other properties to fund repairs to the palace.
Frank H, London.,
Why not sell one of the Rembrants? There is a huge collection of works in the possesion of the royal house hold one or two of theses could easdily pay for the work. I find it totaly immoral when in a time of rapidly rising interest rates and when home repossesions are at an all time high we should be asked to shell out once more. H.M.Q. could even force a referendum on the european constitution, I'd quite happily pay her out of the money we give the E.U. if she complied with her coronation oath.
El Gordo, Farnborough, Hants
HRH Liz should just charge some billionaire American $2mil, oh heck, $5mil, for a weekend stay at the palace. She could raise enough money to repair all her castles and be done with it.
Charge the public for the Changing of the Guard? Scanadalous!
Sue, Los Angeles, USA