David Byers and Philippe Naughton
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
Married couples would get a tax and benefits boost worth thousands of pounds per year under a Conservative strategy unveiled today to avert Britain's family and social breakdown, which the party claims costs the taxpayer billions.
A major policy review commissioned by David Cameron, which was headed by the former party leader Iain Duncan Smith, called for spouses to be allowed to transfer any unused tax allowances to their partners.
They said the move would particularly help single-earner couples, where one parent stayed at home with young children.
In a move likely to prove controversial with the Tory right, Mr Duncan Smith indicated that the plans would probably also apply to gay couples in civil partnerships. When questioned on the matter, the MP acknowledged that the unions, which provide gay couples with legally enshrined rights, are "here to stay", although the report does not mention the issue itself.
The proposals - set out in a bumper 671-page report entitled Breakthrough Britain - are designed to remove what the document describes as disincentives for couples to stay together.
It claims that the transferable personal tax allowance, which will be worth £20 per week to one-earner households, would provide symbolic recognition for the institution of marriage. "It would indicate that marriage is valued because of its benefits to children and wider society," it adds.
The plans also suggest increasing couples' allowances through working tax credits, which could give 1.8 million couples an additional £32 per week; a trebling of child benefit for the first three years for all parents; and getting more single parents off benefits at an earlier stage and back into work.
Special marriage guidance sessions before a union takes place would also be initiated, giving people advice on how to work through problems.
The report claims that the moves in support of marriage and the family would help to remove a large part of the cause for social breakdown within society, which the report says costs the UK economy £102bn a year. Family breakdown itself takes up £24bn, crime £60bn and educational under-achievement £18bn, it adds.
Mr Duncan Smith dismissed claims that his group was "finger wagging or moralising," adding that marriage as an institution provided crucial stability to the lives of children.
"The Government has jigged the system so that lone parents do reasonably well on the way into part-time work, but couples don't at all on benefits," he said.
"You get heavily penalised if you’re a couple living together if one of you wants to stay at home, perhaps in the first two or three years and look after your child or to look after an elderly relative. You get heavily taxed.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It's about time that a political party stood up for people who do the best thing for their children, which is marry. Those shouting loudest in opposition to this are the people who are getting more state support than anybody else to keep their fatherless children. It has been CLEARLY shown that the best relationship in which to bring up children is marriage and the evidence is unequivocal. Divorce and single parent scenarios are the WORST situations for children and that statistic is also unequivocal. Somebody has to stand up for what is RIGHT, not just convenient. I think we need a complete overhaul of the benefits system too. Single parents are taking the country to the cleaners and people who want to do the right thing for their kids are punished. Anyone working with children will have, seen the effects......an awful lot of ineducable people. Single parents will tell you what marvellous children they have and how they achieve. NOT TRUE EITHER and the Government are well aware of it.
judy, Liverpool, england
Stop whining all you cohabiters and marry!
judy, Liverpool, england
I hope the tax break would only be for those with kids. As an unmarried non-parent I don't mind paying for the next generation via my taxes, but don't see why I should put extra money in the back pocket of a childless couple who happen to have taken a trip down the aisle, rather than contribute further to single parents (many of whom have been left holding the baby, quite literally) doing their best to raise their kids.
LW, London,
Social justice ; back to work !
Jo Sullivan, Liverpool, Merseyside
Why have the Tories mentioned working tax credits. Tax credits have been a right mess and cost a fortune to administer, and are regurarly wrong. Just get rid of them and up the zero tax band.
Al, Newcastle,
Married, what exactly is married?
I have 4 children; 2, 12, 13 and 14 years of age who are thiving academically, socially and spiritually and my partner and I are not married, but have been in a 'stable relationship' for the past 17 years.
We both work now and have always done so and take exception to the generalisation that non married couples are insome way inferior parents.
Who does it suit for us to be married? The government? The church? (Which of the many?)
I am sure there are very many loving and caring parents who are not married, who work hard to provide for there children and resent the 'nanny state' telling us how to live our lives and now to make matters worse, the Tories are prepared to use bribery in their hoppocritical crusade.
John Montgomery, Morvern, Scotland
This idea seems so obvious that I don't really see what there is to debate (except for the absurd idea of limiting benefits to married couples only). If a mother gives up work, leaving the father as sole breadwinner, why on earth does he continue to be taxed as if his partner is earning? Why should a father who is supporting a wife and child(ren) get charged higher rate tax on anything over £34,600, while a childless working couple (earning roughly the same as each other) effectively only pay higher rate tax when their combined earnings exceed £69,200? It's hardly surprising that people are waiting later and later to have children - or giving up on the idea altogether - when the tax system penalises single-income households in this way.
Johnny, London,
Marriage between a man & a woman provides more chance of a stable home environment. Successive governments have removed all fiscal support for marriage, they have skewed the tax & benefits system to encourage single parenthood. One bizarre feature of tax credits, is a single parent with 2 children who works for just 16 hours can expect an income of £487 a week after these credits are paid. But the breadwinner of a two-parent family, also with 2 children, would have to work 116 hours to get the same amount. Itâs time the imbalance was addressed. 70% of delinquents & drug addicts come from lone parent families. Children from broken homes often do poorly at school, have a higher than average chance of drifting into crime, make up a high proportion of the prison population & all too often end up jobless & dependent on benefits. Same sex marriages should get no married couples tax benefits whatsoever & children should not be allowed to be fostered or adopted by people in these relationships
Lynda Plum, London, england