Richard Brooks
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
THE government is set to reject a £500m road scheme which is seen as vital to preserving the status of Stonehenge as a World Heritage site.
A tunnel more than a mile long would have taken the A303 trunk road under the extensive prehistoric landscape in which the stone circle stands. A new visitor centre had also been planned.
Despite 20 years of work by English Heritage, which manages Stonehenge, and several planning inquiries costing £25m, a senior government source said last week that the scheme was “simply far too expensive”.
Instead, the culture and transport departments are planning a far cheaper scheme for a new bypass road.
The decision will be a blow to Sir Neil Cossons, the outgoing chairman of English Heritage. He said in a valedictory interview this weekend: “If this road project fails we shall have to wait many more years before there is another solution.”
Cossons, who has spent seven years in the job, added: “The new tunnel, the closure of other roads in the area around Stonehenge and the visitor centre should have been ready for 2012. It was timed for the Olympics. After all, an image of Stonehenge was used in the video that in 2005 helped us to win the Games.
“Stonehenge is international currency, known throughout the world.”
The tunnel to carry the A303 and the visitor centre might have put an end to one of the most spectacular views from any road in England, but for tourists it would have made access easier to Stonehenge, which attracts about 800,000 visitors a year. It would also have returned the 5,000-year-old monument to a grassland setting.
Rejection means that the planned £67m visitor centre, from which mini-buses would have taken visitors to the site, will be shelved, as its location was dependent on the tunnel.
It could also jeopardise the status of Stonehenge as a World Heritage site, awarded by Unesco in 1986. At the time, the United Nations cultural body told the government that it must improve access and take nearby roads away from the site. Unesco will consider delisting Stonehenge at its next meeting in February.
The government’s preferred solution now is for the stretch of the A303 that at present passes close to the south of the stone circle to be diverted well to the north. This would be a much cheaper option as no tunnel would be needed. However, it would need the permission of the Ministry of Defence to take the road, which would then become a dual carriage-way, through an army area.
“The government has consistly failed to do what it promised to Unesco,” said Robert Key, Tory MP for Salisbury. “It is cocking a snook at the World Heritage committee.”
Cossons also used the interview to attack the government for allowing ugly housing estates and super-market warehouses to blight rural areas, calling the huge white-roofed sheds “a blot on the landscape”.
“And what do they hold?” he asked. “Very often thousands of bottled waters whose plastic is environmentally unfriendly. The greenfield sites have been ruined.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This debate highlights the strategic error made and reinforced by successive governments to expand the A303 into the major trunk route to and from the south-west instead of the historic A30 route, which passes closer to the population centres and would have provided greater access to the region.
Thomas, London,
Hopefully UNESCO removes Stonehenge from their List well before February, as they did with the Oman Arabian Oryx Sanctuary. On 28th June 2007, the Arabian Oryx Sanctuary was the first site ever to be removed from UNESCOâs World Heritage List, and it was a blessing for both the country and the world. The government wanted to extract minerals from below Oman's Arabian Oryx and UNESCO was against it. Fortunately, the Sanctuary was delisted and the world is now benefiting from it. Likewise, the British government wants to extract artifacts from below Stonehenge's Heelstone, and once again UNESCO is against it. That is the reason the government "is cocking a snook at the World Heritage committee," in Robert Key words. With a little help from The Times the country will be benefiting from a UNESCO World Heritage Site delistment soon. The British government wants the delisting of Stonehenge. It will be a blessing for both the country and the world, just as Oman's Arabian Oryx Sanctuary now is.
Garry Denke, Plano, Texas
The case for putting the A303 into a tunnel remains compelling. None of the surface alternatives - which have already been examined and ruled out - would meet the archaeological, environmental, economic and transport challenges of this unique site. The tunnel route is not only the best alternative; it could also be completed far more quickly than any of the others, having already been approved following a full statutory public inquiry. This is the only option that could be finished in time for the 2012 Olympics. Further delay would be a serious blow to the south-west region, for which the A303 is an important strategic link for commercial and tourist traffic. The cost is high, but in the view of the RAC Foundation, the status of Stonehenge as a World Heritage Site makes it a price worth paying.
Sheila Rainger, London,
Mike, I think the point of the new EH plan is precisely to return Stonehenge to its landscape, and move the Visitor Centre and carpark much further away than they were even when you first went. You're right: at the moment it is horrible, but EH know that and want to change it. It's a pity that the government can't accept your and their concerns. Losing WH status would be a blow to the UK's international cultural status. so perhaps, sadly, it could be a good thing: anything (legal) that persuades the government to improve matters must be applauded?
Kirsty, London, UK
Nothing anyone does or doesn't do at Stonehenge, or whether it has World heritage status or not will prevent hundreds of thousands visiting it. It already has an international Iconic status and overseas visitors will continue to come and see it however it is presented because it has a magic unlike anywhere else in the world and will still be here long after we have all gone.
mark cawdrey, Oxford, UK
Too bad but what do you expect? You have something everyone wants to see so you need a place to park, food, toilet, etc. If your government won't help, then tough beans. Take pictures now, while you can, before the superhighway goes directly through the middle of it and the stones are used for landfill.
Pete, Hamburg, Germany
I for one do not care if Stonehenge loses its world heritage status. When I first saw it, it was a stone circle standing in a field and that was all. It left a powerful impression. Last time I visited it, it was converted to a typical English Heritage 'seperate the tourist from its money' centre and had lost its appeal as a giant from an ancient time.
Next thing you know, they'll want to move it to a more suitable site - and maybe re-erect some of the fallen stones. And I really don't care if they do, they couldn't spoil it any more than they have.
Mike Poulsen, Reading, Berkshire