David Byers
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

The Environment Agency chairman today defended the five-figure bonuses paid to some of his senior staff, after an outcry from residents affected by the floods who complained that defences were inadequate.
Claiming that the agency had responded "wonderfully well" to the floods, Sir John Harman rejected calls for staff to rescind their advances, which included a 15 per cent bonus of £24,000 for chief executive Baroness Young on top of her £163,000 salary.
The Sunday Times yesterday disclosed that performance bonuses had been paid to senior executives at the agency shortly before the recent floods, which saw more than 10,000 people driven out of their homes, and 340,000 people left without a mains supply after a water treatment works flooded. More than a week on, 120,000 homes remain without running water.
Asked whether he thought the money should be repaid, Sir John told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Well, no, I don’t really. I know absolutely that staff, not just my staff in the Environment Agency, at all levels have responded wonderfully well."
Sir John added that bonuses were paid for "measured" performance targets. "They were paid for delivering new defences, which they did, improving the maintenance of existing defences, which they did, extending flood warnings, which they did, and managing all that at a time when there was some reduction in funding," he said.
"I think actually, from my very close experience of how they have performed, it is really unfortunate this story is running."
However, shoppers queuing for bottled water at a Tesco supermarket in Quedgeley, near Gloucester, had called on the agency to hand the bonus money over to flood victims, claiming that defences around the area had been neglected. Around 12,000 properties in Gloucestershire have now had water supplies restored after the flooded Mythe treatment plant was reopened over the weekend, but a further 120,000 are still without any water.
Severn Trent Water said today it would take until August 5 until all customers had their supplies restored. The company added that all water is, at present, unsafe to drink even when boiled - meaning swathes of people would have to continue relying on bowsers and bottled water being handed out at locations around Gloucestershire.
John Edwards, 53, one of those queuing in Quedgeley, described the Environment Agency's pay bonuses as "disgusting". He said: "They should hand it back and use the money for flood defences or to help people who have lost everything. It’s not showing any community spirit like we’ve been trying our best to do."
Audrey Brierly, 71, who has been forced to go to the Tesco store everyday to collect water added: "They should give the bonuses back to those poor people in Tewkesbury. They blame global warming for this, but I think it’s sheer neglect."
Today, Gloucestershire's Chief Constable urged the Government to make a special exception for the county's emergency services and grant them more funding than rules currently allow.
"This is going to be recorded as the largest peacetime operation the country has seen," said Dr Tim Brain.
"We’ve played a crucial role in that operation. There are special grants available, which mean organisations like ourselves are expected to bear the first few hundred thousand pounds or possibly million in this case in costs.
"That’s a very large sum of money to be taken from our annual budget. I’m hoping for the police and other emergency services that these rules are waived because of the extraordinary nature of this emergency."
He added: "I’m hoping we will be treated as a special case for the funding for 2008/09. We have got every indication from central Government that they will give the support and help we need and I hope that continues."
Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary, warned today that extreme weather events would become more frequent as a result of climate change.
"We are going to have to adapt to a different world. There is no doubt about that at all," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
"That is why we need to invest more in flood defences, which is what we are doing. That is why we need to look at how we can adapt our homes if we live in areas where there is a risk of flooding."
However, after recording the largest amount of rainfall in modern history over May, June and the first half of July, Britain was today enjoying a rare glimpse of sunshine.
Forecasters have predicted sunny spells for much of this week, with The Times's weatherman Paul Simons saying that a spell of high pressure could see conditions improve for even longer.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
How can they think that they have done wonderfully well, when the flood defences didn't defend against a flood? What's next? The Immigration service to get bonuses for failing to keep a record of immigration? The NHS directors to get a bonus for plunging the NHS into the red?
As for the excuse that the level of rain is 'unprecedented', it is laughable. How can the Agency that is meant to protect us against floods say they were caught out by the rain? If flood defences can't stop a river bursting its banks then perhaps they should rename them, what about 'Light Rain Defences' with a disclaimer 'Not to be relied upon in times of flooding'. At least that way they can say that they performed wonderfully well whilst looking flood victims and tax payers in the eye.
I would also like to see someone justify Baroness Young's ludicrous salary, particularly in light of recent events.
John, Nottingham,
The bonuses were for reaching targets placed on the Environment Agency. These targets were placed on the Agency by the government. They entail improving the service with a reduced (in real term) budget. The executives were successful in this, so they received the bonuses, good for them!
What this does show is that the executives were more concerned about reaching targets than protecting the Agency and therefore the public.
We need more people running quangos who will fight for what is best for the organisation, and itâs responsibilities, and not just another mouthpiece for government policy.
This is why the executives of the Agency must take responsibility for long term standards of flood defences and any future failures.
Hugh, Bridgend,
You couldn't think of a worse time to be awarding bonuses to
officials than now whilst people in the affected areas are still without water. Reconnection and clearing-up should be the priorities not this. I can hardly begin to imagine what life must be like for those flooded out or queuing up for water and surely that should be what is most important if only on a Health and Safety issue.
Meanwhile the Olympic gravy train goes on regardless - very insensitive to hear about vast sums being earmarked for this whilst flood defence budgets were cut.
carole, London, UK
TheEnviroment Agency big wigs have
received their bonuses for doing a good job - carrying out the politicians wishes - politicians wishes that have ignored clearing out culverts, drains and water ways - which would have allowed a greater amount of flood water to run away - thus at least reducing water levels and the damage to peoples homes and civic amenities.
The amount of flooding is proportional to water retention due to it's inability to drain away through the drains culverts and water courses.
A public enquiry should be held into the amount of work done to clear drains culverts and water courses in the last three years - my information is very little -that work has been neglected!
They gambled that there would not be such a high rainfall and they were wrong!
But they did not suffer -they benfited -and the public lost!
So they have no right to any bonuses which should be repaid -& these executives should be sacked for failing to adequately protect the public.
allan ledwith, Colchester, UK
Why are we paying people bonuses, have these people found a way of making water? Have they just discovered flood planes.
Seems to me there bonus is they have a job, working in an industry where the customer can't say 'NO' what a joke.
michael bradley, Northampton, Northamtonshire
Responding wonderfully well is not quite the same as protecting. Armour is protection, bandage is the wonderfull response to the protection that has FAILED.
David Masu, Zürich,
bonus criteria are often set at ludicusly low targets, and impossible to miss. And to call them "staff" is an insult to the workers that have done all the real effort over the last weeks.
paul heeley, Worcester, UK
Once again in the face of monumental incompetence the heads of our public services close ranks and tell us what a wonderful job they are doing and how they deserve every last penny of their six figures salaries and obscene bonuses. I guess that we can rest safely in the knowledge that they will be forcing the water authorities to spend their vast profits on repairing the infrastructure that they have for so long neglected.However the reality is that rather than spend their profits they will up the price of the water rates and increase the dividends to shareholders as they plow all that extra cash not into repairs but into their P & L Acc. on the basis that it will be a few years before this happens again and by then somebody else will be responsible.
jeff cox, london, england
I have just read your article with total disbelief. The Environment Agency chairman says "they responded wonderfully well". There are thousands of people responding wonderfully well in their jobs in this country. How about a doctor or nurse who has to watch people die every day. The police officer who has to tell a loved one of a death. Did these people go out personally into the floods to help people? The bonuses are obscene and these people should feel very ashamed and are extremely greedy for accepting them.
Lorraine Sulman, Swindon, Wilts
Nice to see the bosses get pay rises off the backs off workers who reched the targets for them, then got redundancy in efforts to 'cut costs'.
Why don't you hand back the money and give some of us our jobs back???
Disgusted, Cardiff, Wales
Sounds like the typical attitude of the public sector. Who are these people really serving? Clearly this situation highlights the flood defenses in inland towns and village are in need of serious attention. To claim that work by the responsible individuals is not only satisifactory but of exceptional performance to warrant a bonus, is an insult to those affected. Especially as the cost of the damage will be largely paid by the tax payer and general population through higher insurance premiums, house prices rises in secure areas, etc. To blame this on change is a disgrace, a swift pass the buck. If change has occured then it should been matched in planning and prevention of problems.
Dave, London, UK
As far as I can see the Environment Agency has responded well to a difficult situation. The main omission seems to be on the part of Utility Companies not protecting low lying strategic installations from potential flooding.
I don't remember any commentator complaining that these bonuses had been paid before the most recent flooding. The call to repay the bonuses seems to be yet another example of the UK media creating a blame culture.
Gerry Lynch, Chichester,
When are we going to abolish the house of Lords, again?
Dan, Hampton, UK