Mark Macaskill
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
SOME of Britain’s highest profile game-shooting enthusiasts are turning their back on the sport in disgust at the “mass slaughter” of birds, often by parties of City traders paying thousands of pounds a day.
Those who have largely given up traditional organised shoots that kill several hundred birds in a day include Marco Pierre White and Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, the chefs. Guy Ritchie, the film director and husband of Madonna, is also understood to have been put off large-scale shooting.
There is now such an over-supply of game birds that thousands of those killed are not eaten but simply buried at the end of a shoot.
“I used to shoot for about 85 days a year; I once shot 65 birds in one go. You don’t really think about it, but afterwards when I counted them up it really affected me,” said White. “I simply cannot justify in my own mind killing all those birds.
“I still shoot with friends perhaps five days a year for highflying birds and for smaller bags. I find it more challenging.” Shooting has boomed in recent years and has almost threatened to rival golf as the City’s favourite networking sport. The British Association for Shooting and Conservation saw its membership rise to 128,000 last year from 110,000 in 1996.
Tomorrow sees the traditional start of the grouse season, delayed from today, “the Glorious 12th”, to avoid shooting on a Sunday. It lasts until December and will see some 50,000 birds shot across Britain.
Grouse are all wild birds, but some of the sharpest criticism has surrounded pheasants and partridges reared for shooting.
“In recent seasons, pheasants and partridges have been raised and shot in such vast numbers that no market could be found to take them all,” says Fearnley-Whittingstall on his website.
“Birds have been buried in mass graves or simply ploughed into the fields. Such massacres of apparently disposable birds put any possibility of a convincing moral defence under the greatest possible strain.”
Commercial shoots charge up to £6,000 per person for a package that includes a day’s shooting plus a black tie supper and overnight accommodation in venues such as a country house hotel, manor or castle.
The Scottish Highlands are the most popular area for grouse shooting, while pheasants are shot in large numbers over much of England, particularly East Anglia and western counties such as Devon and Wiltshire.
One former shooter said, however, that many of the new breed of shooting enthusiasts were far more interested in killing the maximum number of birds than in the sport.
“There’s a sense that the commercial shooters are going for bigger and bigger bags, that hauls of over 1,000 birds for eight guns is a considerable slaughter. It’s gone back to Edwardian shooting and it’s all being driven by City money,” he said.
James Wheatley, an accountant, used to shoot for pleasure in Scotland before moving to Suffolk two years ago.
Now he has hung up his gun for the last time, disenchanted by the direction the sport has taken. “The whole aim of breeding some of these birds for commercial purposes is to get them to fly and be shot and I really find that offensive.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is always interesting to listen to any informed points of view, however listening to the comments of people ignorant to the whole arena of field sports is both a waste of time and poisonous.
With laughably naive opinions such as the suspected killing of golden eagles as predator control, and the artificially high number of grouse which in fact are soley wild birds, I do not feel we need to defend our way of life against such ignorant attacks.
It is true that huge bag number days do give our sport a bad name, however this will be a feeling felt by not only those that are against our sport!
Joe Thompson, Florence, Italy
All of this is cruel enough without an understanding of where the partridge and pheasants come from .They are not wild but bred in captivity to be released just prior to the shooting season. Read about the barren cages in which the tens of thousands of breeding birds are incarcerated for the whole of their 2 year economic life on the Animal Aid website. Navigate to Assault and Battery and see video of their wretched lives. Its all in the name of "sport".
Kit Davidson, Llanfyllin, Powys
Criticism of lage shoots is as old as driven shooting, Punch used to lampoon Prince Albert for his battue.
Many of the criticisms stand up to little scrutiny. They are founded in antipathy towards shooting in general and used as a stick with which to beat a sport that is hard to criticise on any sensible level. Most of this is heresay.
A well-managed shooting estate is a haven for wildlife because the vermin that kill game birds also kill song birds.
We recently had a birdwatcher enthusing on the fantastic hatch of sand martins and swifts - when we told him that the reason was that we had shot the foxes that were digging out the nests, he suddenly did not want to know. Good countryside management is not just good for game birds.
There are occasions where unskilled shooters are shooting at large numbers of birds that would not be challenging to good shots. In any walk of life we find the 'dedicated and proficient' and the 'enthusiastic but challenged'. Shooting is no different.
Diggory Hadoke, London, UK
These big bag shoots are a tiny percentage of the actual shooting sports and are spoiling it for the genuine shooter... some of these guys cannot shoot and do more harm than good..
Alex Nimmo, stirling, scotland
I live next door to a pheasant shoot where hundreds and hundreds of birds are raised and hand fed daily at certain points to ensure their presence when shooting begins. The owner is an absentee landlord who schmoozes city contacts on shooting days where even I who have never picked up a gun could manage to hit something, the air is so thick with birds. Other land owners locally let their neighbours walk on their land but not ours, we are prevented from entering woodland with dark warnings of traps that might injure our dogs as the keeper works 24/7 to keep foxes away from the over-stocked larder on their doorstep.
Jayne, Newbury, Berkshire
Not to mention the slaughter of any predatory bird - golden eagle, peregrine, harrier on moors and goshawk, buzzard and sparrowhawk on low ground shoots - that everyone knows is going on as "vermin control".
All to support target shooting of thousands of grouse at artificially ludicrous levels or pheasant and partidge at environmentally damaging levels...
Surely we have the wit and expertise to use our precious countryside in a more intelligent manner?
Dave Dick, Edinburgh, Scotland
There is no need to shoot for fun and recreation at all; it is a cruel and barbaric activity against defenceless creatures.
There is absolutely nothing "sporting" about this activity and in my view it should be banned. If they want to shoot live targets they should join the army and test their mettle against insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan
Angus Macmillan, Balloch,