Sean O’Neill
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Britain’s most senior policeman was criticised for his lack of knowledge when an innocent man was shot dead by officers on the London Underground.
Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, faced the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) for the first time since a report concluded that he was kept in the dark for 24 hours about the shooting of Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell Tube station. Richard Barnes, an MPA member, said he was “distressed” that Britain’s top policeman lacked “an inquiring mind” in the hours after Mr de Menezes, 27, was shot, mistaken for a suicide bomber a day after attempted suicide bombings in London and a fortnight after the July 7 attacks.
Off-duty officers and secretaries knew within hours that the wrong man had been shot, but Sir Ian was not told until the next day.
He said: “We got it appallingly wrong but we are not guilty of complete idiocy. My feeling is that if this happened again, the information would flow very differently.”
Britain’s most senior policeman was fiercely criticised for his performance on the day that his officers shot an innocent man dead on the London Underground.
Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, yesterday faced his force’s governing authority for the first time since a report concluded that he was kept in the dark for 24 hours about the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell Tube station.
Members of the Metropolitan Police Authority queued up to attack Sir Ian and question his leadership qualities in the wake of the Stockwell Two report by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.
Richard Barnes, a Conservative member of the authority, said that he was distressed that Britain’s top policeman lacked “an inquiring mind” in the crucial hours after Mr de Menezes, 27, was shot.
The Brazilian electrician was shot eight times when he was mistaken for a suicide bomber on July 22, 2005.
Mr Barnes said: “There are such major questions within this that I have really deep-seated concerns about the leadership of the Metropolitan Police.”
The shooting took place a day after a series of attempted suicide bombings on London’s transport system and just a fortnight after the July 7 attacks in which 52 people were murdered.
A series of internal and external communication failings meant that wrong information issued by Scotland Yard about Mr de Menezes was not corrected.
Off-duty officers and secretaries were aware that the wrong man had been shot within hours, but Sir Ian was not told by senior officers of the mistake until the next day.
Sir Ian told the authority that the events of that summer were unique and placed immense pressure on the police.
“The situation that the Met faced on that day was, as far as we know, unprecedented anywhere in the Western world,” he told the meeting. “There had been no situation where a suicide bomber had been on the run.”
But Peter Herbert, an independent member of the authority, questioned Sir Ian’s defence and asked the commissioner if he would resign. “Every time I hear that it was unprecedented I get slightly more cynical,” Mr Herbert said.
“It was not unique, everyone knew this would happen after Madrid. This was foreseeable and that is what you are there for.”
Mr Herbert said that Londoners found it incredible that Sir Ian had gone home on the evening of the shooting without knowing all the information.
Sir Ian, however, replied: “We got it appallingly wrong but we are not guilty of complete idiocy. My feeling is that if this happened again, the information would flow very differently.”
The Commissioner insisted that he would not resign over the matter, and said he hoped that the public would judge his performance over his entire period in office. Sir Ian said: “My understanding is that the public put July 22 and 23 and the arrests eight days later as a sequence. This was the matter that damaged public confidence in the police force and in some way I am part of that.”
He said that he wished his officers and aides had kept him better informed but that his leadership style was to accept responsibility and not to blame others for the mistakes made.
Scotland Yard faces a trial under health and safety legislation next month over the shooting of Mr de Menezes.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
JF, So, because you say other police forces shoot members of the public dead in the street it is OK then for us to do it?
I thought we had moved forward as a nation.
Perhaps we can harken back to the halcyon days of cock fighting and rickets.
Ken Wyatt, Todmorden, UK
Interesting that the de Menezes Health and Safety trial coincides with the long-delayed Princess Diana Inquest. Hard to escape the conclusion that Authority has a lot to hide. Far from cleaning the stables, this looks more like muddying the waters. And next month the Barry George Appeal comes up. Still at least UK Authority has managed to sweep Lockerbie under the carpet, thanks to the deal Tony cut with young Saif al-Islam. Britain's Criminal Justice System is having no manner of luck.
"My government would never do anything that wicked." On a scale of one-to-ten, how far do you agree with the above statement? Zero?
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan
And to think that there have been criticism from certain members of the Briitsh police of their portuguese counterparts´ handling of the McCann affair...
volia pollastre, valencia, spain
Yes, the shooting of Mr de Menezes was an awful thing to happen, but why is no one asking whether any other police force in the free world would have done things better? The American police, the French police, can be notoriously trigger-happy and, largely, get away with it. As for the Brazilian police - why does no one ask how many innocent people they have shot in the last year? Compared with many police forces, our largely unarmed officers mercifully kill very few people. You can walk down a British street in the certain knowledge that you are as likely to be shot by mistake by a policeman as you are to win the lottery jackpot. Not so, in some French and American cities. So let's try and keep a sense of proportion!
JF, Canterbury, UK
Whether anyone was told about it afterwards remains, in my mind, one of the least important issues.
An innocent man was targeted and murdered by the authorities in a British city and no-one was to blame. And the only offence may be infringement of health and safety regulations.
And Sir Ian says they are not guilty of complete idiocy? Complete idiocy is how I would describe it, no matter who told what to whom and when.
But I suppose we should be re-assured by the fact that if it happened again the information flow would be very different. As in, they wouldn't tell anyone about it?
Mike Poulsen, Reading, Berkshire