Robert Booth and Dipesh Gadher
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
LORD COE is at the centre of a row this weekend amid claims that his private businesses have benefited from his role as head of the London Olympics.
Coe, chairman of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (Locog), has threatened legal action against Channel 4 which tomorrow plans to broadcast a six-month investigation highlighting the “real winners and losers” of the 2012 Games.
Dispatches intends to show how Coe’s enhanced Olympic status may have boosted his personal earnings on top of his official annual salary of £285,000.
Coe, one of Britain’s greatest Olympians, received almost £200,000 for private speaking engagements, product endorsements and consultancy work over two months shortly after he secured the Games for London in July 2005, according to company accounts.
The earnings were channelled into a company that was set up by Coe in March 2005 but did not start trading until the following November. A separate parent company established 16 days after London’s victory envisaged earning £850,000 in a year from Coe’s private activities, according to Dispatches.
The claims add to the scrutiny of the personal benefits being enjoyed by officials planning the 2012 Games. A senior accountant was paid £2,440 a day and Paul Deighton, Locog’s chief executive, received a bonus of £100,000. He commissioned the Olympic logo, denounced by critics as a “puerile mess”, and secured sponsorship for the Games.
Until now, criticism has focused largely on the spiralling building and security budget, which has risen from £2.4 billion to £9.3 billion.
Coe denies cashing in on the Games and says he has declared all his outside business interests to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. He has instructed Carter-Ruck, the libel lawyers, to defend him.
Jeremy Lee, Coe’s agent for speaking engagements, bills the former Olympic champion as the man who “restored national pride by leading Britain’s victorious 2012 bid”. He advertises Coe’s fee as £10,000 to £25,000.
His biography on Lee’s web-site says: “Seb headed the British bid which finally triumphed over the favourites, France, in Singa-pore. Even Le Figaro described the double Olympic gold medal-list as having achieved a remarkable feat in leading the London 2012 bid to victory.” It also mentions his 12 world records and his short career as a Tory MP.
The IOC’s code of ethics prohibits Coe from focusing on his official role when he is being paid to speak in a private capacity.
A spokeswoman for Locog said Coe earned no more than £10,000 for each speech.
“If you try and book Seb for a speech he is speaking as Seb the man,” she said. “The very clear agreement that he adheres to is that he doesn’t get paid for speeches that are about 2012.
“He has been speaking for more than 20 years about his career as an athlete and politician and has been earning an income from it, as a lot of people in public life do. We believe it’s fine for him to continue doing that. This is income that he has rightly and fairly earned.”
Lee said that Coe “touches on” the 2012 Olympics, but talks mainly about his sporting achievements. He has given speeches to clients including St James’s Place, an investment company.
The peer says he has given up lucrative roles in broadcasting and turned down many commercial opportunities since he took on the 2012 job.
Coe’s private earnings are channelled into Sebastian Coe Limited (SCL), part of the Complete Leisure Group, of which Coe is majority shareholder. Investors include William Hague, the former Tory leader, who employed Coe as his private secretary.
A prospectus for potential investors acquired by Dispatches states: “SCL has a projected turnover of £850,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006.”
However, a spokeswoman for Coe said the prospectus was never ratified and that accounts to be filed soon are likely to show a lower turnover.
Newly published accounts reveal the full extent of the generous earnings of Olympic officials. The Olympic Delivery Authority, the body in charge of construction, paid £232,000 for the services of David Leather, a partner at Ernst & Young, for 19 weeks last summer. It equates to a daily rate of £2,440.
“This is ludicrous,” said Don Foster MP, the Liberal Democrat spokesman for the Olympics. “If they needed somebody temporarily they had the whole of the civil service there to support them. ”
Jonathan Edwards, the former Olympic triple jump champion, was paid £14,500 in his role as a representative for athletes on the Locog board. He was also paid £87,000 for “consultancy services”.
Princess Anne, another nonexecutive director and head of the British Olympic Association, received £4,000 for attending up to four board meetings at Locog’s headquarters in Canary Wharf.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
good to see the same political high standards continue in the 2012 olympics , thankyou channel 4
colin, portsmouth, hants
"LOCOG is privately funded, not by the taxpayer"
Smoke and mirrors Mr/Ms Hillman.
Who is paying the costs for the Olympics? The taxpayers of Britain and the poor sods that will miss out because their lottery funds have been diverted to the Olympic cause - that's who. It doesn't matter how many "funds", "committees" or other NGO's you channel it through - the bottom line is that WE are paying and LOCOG is collecting.
Brian M, Paisley, Scotland
£2.4b wasn't a final budget. It was a random number thought up on a few quick judgements before people could be assigned to assessing the actual cost.
I just wasted an hour of my life watching an insult to british TV. I would've been better off turning the box on at 9 to catch Michael Moore talk more truth.
What channel 4 producers don't realise... (or maybe they do!) is that not every one watching Dispatches is smart. The majority of viewers will fall for the technical jargon and conspiracy theories. If money was actually being wasted, Lord Coe would commission a BBC documentary, not a C4 one just to get ratings. Now, the 2012 Olympics have a publicity fight on their hands which in the end will cost them even more in lost investment. By making up lies, Dispatches will end up creating for real the ficticious situation they've made up.
James Rothschild, Leeds, West Yorksire
I'm a tax payer, I'm a businessman, if I had his record of success I'd be charging tripple his salary. Why shouldn't his measly fee of £10-25K for speeches be what it is? - He did after all win us the Olympics. Tax payers aren't paying extra, the lottery fund is, and why shouldn't it? The national pride 2012 SHOULD be instilling (as opposed to this reckless ill-founded media banter) easily compensates for the loss of sports funding.
I watched Dispatches just now, and they should be taken to court for every bit of a penny they're worth. They even had the nerve to draw sympathy votes from footage taken of games for youths set up BY the very people they were slandering.
Jonathan Edwards is a celebrity. £14,500 for rep on the Locog board is a shamefully small fee.
SCL's £850K turnover (turnover, NOT profit) is what I would expect. We've put our faith in a businessman, I would be a lot more worried if his companies weren't making money!
A Cooke, London, middlesex
Yet more proof that Paris actually "won" at the Olympics game, and that the UK lost miserably.
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California
"He has instructed Carter-Ruck, the libel lawyers, to defend him."
shome mishtake shurely? Should read: "To threaten an attack, on his behalf, using Britain's libel laws which have so often been used against investigative journalists". 'Defend' will be what anyone he sues will be doing.
Tim, Hackney ,
As though all this wasn't bad enough the "clean up" of the industrial toxins on the Olympic park site are being treated in such a dangerous and unprofessional way that Londoners' health is being put at risk by clouds of potentially toxic dust coming off the site. All in all the Olympics are bad news for London but apparently a few already well off individuals are a making a mint out of it. This does not surprise me, but good on the Times for covering the issue
Mike, London, uk
LOCOG is privately funded, not by the taxpayer.
T Hillman, London,
And who pays for it all in the long run? the poor UK taxpayer, as usual.
C Collier, Fareham,