Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air

The Ministry of Defence has disclosed that Royal Navy divers undertook an unauthorised espionage operation against a Soviet warship docked in Portsmouth in 1955.
The “successful” covert mission to examine the sonar equipment fitted to the Soviet cruiser Sverdlov and other warships was six months before the notorious “Commander Crabb affair” in which a navy frogman vanished after being commissioned by MI6 to check the cruiser that brought Nikita Khrushchev on an official visit to Britain. A headless body, presumed to be that of Commander Lionel “Buster” Crabb, was washed ashore in Chichester 14 months later. It was one of the biggest spy dramas of the Cold War.
The disclosure of an earlier secret diving mission, in October 1955, has been made in a series of classified memorandums and letters released by the MoD under a freedom of information request. They relate to intensive efforts in Whitehall in the early 1970s and again in the 1980s to prevent a television producer from broadcasting a programme about the earlier diving mission, which he had uncovered while researching the Crabb story.
The Admiralty, backed by the Cabinet Office and Foreign and Commonwealth Office, told David Darlow, of Granada, that the programme would breach the national security guidelines set out by the D-notice system. The producer had approached the MoD for help in 1972. Rebuffed, he tried again for a programme to mark the 30th anniversary of Commander Crabb’s death. Despite the passage of time and the known facts about the mission to examine the underside of the Ordzhonikidze, which brought Khrushchev and Nikolai Bulganin, the Soviet Prime Minister, to Portsmouth in April 1956, it was decided that to assist Mr Darlow “would constitute a major breach of our longstanding policy of never discussing intelligence or security matters”.
A secret Whitehall memo added: “In this case, we would run the risk of confirming to the Soviet Union an event which they may still only suspect, and of thereby adding a further irritant to Anglo-Soviet relations.”
Confirmation of the previously unknown diving operation came in an Admiralty “background note” stamped “secret” and dated September 12, 1985, in which an official wrote: “In addition to the 1956 operation carried out against the Soviet ships by Commander Lionel Crabb, a separate diving operation was planned by the Royal Navy.
This second operation was officially cancelled before it took place, but there seems little doubt that some RN personnel from HMS Vernon [a shore-based establishment] nevertheless undertook a (successful) operation as a wholly unofficial enterprise.”
The papers on the MoD’s website include a letter sent to No 10 in 1981 by the naval officer who commanded the secret mission. His name is redacted but he wrote: “I was in charge of the naval operational team who successfully surveyed the undersides of the Russian ships at the time to ensure that all was either ‘safe’ or ‘unsafe’.” He added: “The Security Services, apart from alerting us to the need for this underwater survey operation, engaged Crabb on a separate mission which failed disastrously. This caused political chaos from the Prime Minister downwards.
“Rest assured that I have adhered to the confidentiality of this incident. There were others apart from myself who did the underwater work – I’m sure they too are loyal.”
In separate memos relating to the Crabb affair, questions and answers prepared by the Admiralty in 1956 reveal that the commander was not alone in his mission, and that it took place “without specific ministerial knowledge”.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
WHY?
The puzzle is: Why did they bother...why did they take the risks that such a spy mission would entail?
British and American experiences with RADAR, SONAR and ASDIC, and with convoy and anti-submarine warfare, during WWII would seem to suggest that the Soviets, lacking such extensive experience, would most likely be far behind Western
technological attainments.
Perhaps the targets, Ordzhonikidze et al, were just too tempting to leave alone. In those days, the
Ordzhonikidze was touted by the press as the closest thing to a floating spacecraft: The Greatest Warship in the World! Against a British cruiser, if my life depended on it, I would have chosen the British cruiser without hesitation! History did not bear out the over-hyped and vastly over-sexed media reports of the Ordzhonikidze: From all reports her career and capabilities were very ordinary. Regardless, "super ships" ( e.g.: Bismark, Yamato,Titanic) don't guarantee naval success.
Garth Rex, Glendale Heights, USA