Maurice Chittenden and Daisy Collins
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
A runaway chimpanzee was shot dead by staff at Whipsnade zoo yesterday after he and another animal escaped from their enclosure.
The second chimp gave herself up to a keeper in a nearby field.
Hundreds of visitors were told to lock themselves in their cars or were led to shelter in a gift shop while the animals were being traced.
The drama began just after the wild animal park opened yesterday morning when the two adult animals, Johnny and Koko, were found to be missing from the their enclosure.
The two had been moved to Bedfordshire from Regent’s Park zoo in north London last year.
Johnny, 41, who underwent a vasectomy five years ago, was considered the more dangerous. In a profile written in 2003, staff described him as “a bit of a thug”. He was shot dead in the zoo grounds by a keeper using a rifle a few minutes after the escape was discovered. Soon after, Koko, gave herself up without resistance. “She seemed keen to get back inside,” said a zoo spokeswoman.
The zoo, which is owned by the Zoological Society of London, said in a statement: “As soon as members of staff were aware of the occurrence, the escaped animal procedure was immediately commenced . . . in the interests of public safety, Johnny was shot.”
Dr Alison Cronin, founder and director of Monkey World ape rescue centre in Dorset, said: “Chimpanzees are naturally aggressive ... The decision to destroy one of the escapees ... was a sound one.”
Despite their friendly images, chimps can be killers - adults in captivity can typically weigh up to 12 stone and have the strength of six adult humans.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
You don't mess around with these animals because that's what they are, dangerous animals. They go crazy and are indiscriminate.
There was an instance a couple of years ago when four chimps escaped from an animal sanctuary in California.
One attacked an onlooker, quote "St. James Davis, 62, lost all the fingers from both hands, an eye, part of his nose, cheek, lips and part of his buttocks. He also suffered injury to a foot and his genitals."
In this case two chimps were shot and killed.
In the time it takes a tranq to work, the chimp could kill someone.
You just can't take chances.
Gman, Bradford, England
Funny how an episode like this brings out so many 'experts!'
As a keeper I know what lengths are taken to practice safe escape drills for just such a situation.
Yes humans have made zoo's a neccessary place and now some of us do our best to make these places the best we can.
No one will be more disappointed and upset than the keeper who had to take the shot against the chimp.
I, like everyone else on this story was not present at the incident nor do I have the full facts but it is undoubtly the case that, sad as it is, this would have been the correct decision BEFORE a memeber of the public was hurt or killed.
My sympathesise to all at Whipsnade and especially the professional person who pulled the trigger.
A. Greenyer, Dumfries, Dumfriesshire
Even if anesthetics may have made the chimp more dangerous as the zoo has coaxed other ape 'experts' to say. Wasn't it at least worth the trouble of trying first. You can always shoot this poor monkeys brains out after the tranqs don't work. I can't help but wonder if the 'bit of a thug' rep the chimp had influenced the decision by it's keepers. He wasn't appropriately deferring to the people that were imprisoning him, and probably didn't have many friends among the 'gaurds'. They make movies about the heroic nature of people who escape prison camps all the time. I guess it's different when the prison camp is full of animals.
Billy J Pringle, Austin, USA/Texas
Personally i agree with the few who are saying it was a right decision. If the monkey had attacked a person there would have been an out-roar shouting why had nobody shot it, and i believe they did try to tranquilise the monkey but due to them being remotely more clever than an elephant or horse and having the abilty of hands they were able to remove the dart before it took any affect. I believe they did what they had to do.
Kellie, Bedfordshire,
As a zookeeper this is how you choose to act? Your actions are deplorable and no animal should be under your care. Have you ever heard of tranquilizer guns? That certainly would have been the right and humane way to deal with this. If it weren't for people like you, these amazing animals would be free and not imprisoned for you to become rich off of. Shame on you!
Paula, Brewster, New York, USA
Being a retired vet for large animals, I have had the privilege to work with some of the larger animals at different zoos. This was a very unnecessary move on Dr. Cronin part. They very well could have tranq the animal and moved them to a more secured enviroment. I am ashamed to be in the same professional class as this so-called doctor. Given the circimstances and no people directly in harms way, this was not the way to capture an escaped animal. There are times that more force than tranqs have to be utilized, such as when a park is full and one is on a rampage and visitors are directly in harms way, but as this article reads, this was not the situation. Shame on the zoo and even more shame on a so-called Doctor who is suppose to have more feelings than this. I will tell you as my father, a vet, told me when I was very young in the practice, when you have no more feeling about putting an animal down....get out of practice, your finished. I abided to that to this day.
Dr. Brenda Hough, Sealy, Texas
An absolutely disgusting episode. These animals are held captive, in their interests we are told. Has the zoo so little skill it cannot retake an escaped 'convict' with a disabling shot? Perhaps a useful excuse to get rid of a disturbing presence that would not be quiet. Down with zoos, they are a blight on the world.
helen, Norwich,
Having had the honour to be inside the Chimps enclosure at Whipsnade, I would like to say that it is more secure than the most high security prison.
These animals, whilst they look cute are capable of ripping a mans head off. What would have the uproar if this animal had injured, maimed or even killed a child.
In response to those who said about using tranquiliser darts, these have to be 100% accurate, over a short range and need to stay in. For those who say Safari Parks like these should be closed down, they obviously have no idea what work they actually do. Without places like these, many more animals would be extinct and I believe that all of the chimps at Whipsnade have been born in captivity. Without these breeding programes we wouldn't have the opportunity to enjoy these wonderful animals.
What has happened is a terrible tragedy but I firmly believe this decision was taken with the best intentions. I'm sure that the keepers would have wished for a v.diff outcome.
Judy Baker, Amersham, Bucks
The comments on here are obviously of nieve people!
David Williams, Watford, UK
I live not many miles from Dunstable and we had a big power cut on Saturday morning - just a coincidence or did Dunstable have a similar problem? Did it contribute to the accident? We don't know enough facts yet to make informed comment but what I am sure of is that Whipsnade Zoo will have the biggest broken hearts of all and be the saddest. I'm also thankful that no person was confronted by an 41 year old male chimp - they are exceedingly dangerous creatures. I love Whipsnade Zoo if for no other reason than the close encounters thay have made possible with their beautiful asian elephants. I grieve for both them and Johnnie that this awful accident happened.
Sue, Wendover, Bucks, England
The policies and staff of Whipsnade Zoo need review and replacement. The actions taken reflect a sense of laziness on the part of the zoo and the Zoological Society of London. In today's world of technological advancement non-lethal methods exist. A last resort would conceiveably be tasering if tranquilizers alone were not practical for the cowering zoo staff. The fact that the chimps escaped in the first place demonstrates incompetence and the shooting only reinforces that point.
Peter H. Warkentin, Winnipeg, Canada
Why not have the enclosure build a moat instead of electric fences?, perhaps like Chester Zoo's Chimp island.
John, Cheshire, UK
shooting the male chimp was wrong. they could have used a knock out dart instead. maybe they should make a better enclosure like we have here in america. so they feel more like in their natural enviorment.
William Links, Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin USA
The very fact that the chimps needed to escape in the first place shows that they shouldn't be locked up to begin with.
judy, Liverpool, england
Well the chimps weren't the killers - that dubious accolade goes to us humans. The chimps were escaping from imprisonment.
PB, Crawley, Sussex
An absolutely disgusting episode. These animals are held captive, int heir interesets we are told. Has the zoo so little skill it cannot retake an escaped 'convict' with an disabling shot? Perhaps a useful excuse to get rid of a disturbing prescnce that would not be quiet. Down with zoos, they are a blight on the world.
helen, Norwich,
Do not Steve and Dr Law think that every possible action was taken to try and prevent the shooting of the male chimp? I'm sure the decision was regretted by the zoo staff, but there was no other choice.
Rob, Stoke,
Just as Steve Dubai asked: why not just tranquilise the chimp? They tranq. elephants for gods sake!!
Shameful. Really, the female chimp surrendered, these are not animals, 3 or 4% seperates us genetically from chimps.
They knew their behaviour was wrong, evident in the female surrender.
Really sad.
Shoot the keeper who killed this poor chimp!!
luthor lionel, New York,
Very, very sad. Take an animal out of its natural habitat, imprison it, shoot it when it escapes. Human logic and pathos at its best. A vile thing indeed.
J. Morgado, Cornwall, UK
Zoos and safari parks should be closed down. Animals were not put on earth for human entertainment or use.
Angela Williams, Bexhill on Sea, UK
tranquiliser would have been the obvious thing to do?
donal, cork, ireland
If the only answer they had was to kill the animal then maybe the time has come to close them down.
Peter Mallinson, Swindon, UK
Could it not have been tranquilised?
Steve, Dubai, UAE
British answer to everything when it comes to animals. kill it. vile.
Dr Kevin Law, Dundee, UK