Roger Waite
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
THE head of the official body charged with protecting the English countryside is to call for a review of laws preserving the green belt, clearing the way for thousands of homes to be built on safeguarded land.
Sir Martin Doughty, chairman of Natural England, will use a speech tomorrow to argue that surging demand for new homes means that “the sanctity of green belt land should be questioned”.
Doughty will say consideration should be given to allowing environmentally friendly developments on the 4.2m acres of green belt designed to prevent urban sprawl so that the countryside can be protected from wholesale development.
His proposals have angered some environmental campaigners and are likely to alarm residents of green belt towns and villages who value their tranquillity.
Doughty’s call comes as government housing advisers warned this weekend that the government’s target of building 3m homes by 2020 was too low.
Doughty, speaking on his quango’s first anniversary, will say the green belt “was certainly not intended to deal with the complex environmental challenges that face us today.
“Nobody could deny, and we do not, that the green belt has achieved its primary purpose in constraining urban sprawl. But the consequence of this is that development tends to leapfrog over the green belt and land in much more vulnerable parts of the natural environment.
“We must therefore review the green belt and commit more effort to making the green belt something that adds value.”
The proposal has been criticised by campaigners who believe the green belt’s role is as important today as it was 50 years ago.
Tom Oliver, head of rural policy at the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), the lobby group headed by the author Bill Bryson, said Natural England “fails to recognise the virtue of the green belt and that its permanence is what makes it so effective”. Oliver also expressed concern that Natural England agreed with the government’s 3m homes target. “[Natural England] accepts the government’s endorsement of household projections for 2020 which is extraordinary,” he said.
“Natural England have a statutory duty to protect and conserve the natural environment and here they are accepting projections which are not justified in their own terms and which are certain to undermine the credibility of Natural England’s position as an independent body.” The CPRE will release its own assessment of the quango’s first year of operation tomorrow.
There are 14 green belts in England, the first of which were instituted in 1955. The biggest is the metropolitan green belt around London, but cities such as Oxford, Nottingham and York also have them. A single green belt surrounds the conurbation of Liverpool and Manchester while another hems in the urban regions of south and west Yorkshire.
In total, green belts cover 13% of England. Development is allowed only in exceptional cases of housing shortage.
Supporters of development argue that some green belt land is far from picturesque while some so-called “brownfield” sites in cities that are favoured for development can be valuable wildlife havens.
But opponents argue that once some building is allowed, it would be difficult to control.
Jacqui Lait, the shadow planning minister, said: “There is degraded green belt but I would argue that should that degraded land be built on, the temptation will be for the next site to be built on. The next bit of land then becomes degraded and then there’s no green belt.”
There has already been some pressure on the green belt. Earlier this year, Waltham Forest council in Essex objected to a development of 119 homes near Chingford.
The neighbouring Epping Forest council had agreed to the plans because 80% of the development was to be affordable housing. The plans were approved this month.
Doughty will warn that any new developments on greenfield sites, such as Gordon Brown’s proposed eco-towns, must be of exceptionally high quality.
“Our fear remains that eco-towns will become carbon-neutral battery farms for people, lacking any radical design edge that could see homes for people and habitats for wildlife integrated into the same high-quality green space,” he said.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The built-up areas of Liverpool and Manchester do not form one single conurbation - indeed, as any current roadmap will show, there remains a significant "green" gap between their respective suburban sprawls. So, if there really is "a single greenbelt" surrounding the two, as Roger Waite contends - (and unless that belt is inordinately broad and shaped like a figure-of-eight) - then it still contains a considerable amount of land for further development in those intervening zones...! So why - since flat, featureless land in such a desolate location can hardly be of much earthly use for anything else - does nobody want to build on it, is what I'd like to know...?
John Jay, Walton on Thames, UK
I agree with CPRE and Jacqui Lait - the green belt should remain sacrosanct. Remember one of its main purposes is to ensure that people living in the big connurbations don't have too far to travel to get out into the countryside and breathe some fresh air. Does Sir Martin Doughty really want London to link up with Brighton? There's a huge amount of land available outside the green belts. Better, in my view, to build the extra houses in carefully planned new towns and villages than fill in the green belt, with the likely domino effect Ms Lait warns of.
Barry, Wallington, UK