Greg Hurst, Political Correspondent
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

What is the secret donor row about?
The row is over 19 big donations made by the businessman David Abrahams but channelled secretly through other people: a solicitor, builder, secretary and the wife of a business associate. The donations, together worth £600,000, were registered in their names, concealing the fact that Mr Abrahams was the source. Labour changed the law in 2000 to require that all donations of more than £5,000 are registered. In order to stop foreign donations, the law said that donations via middlemen must also be declared fully.
Who is Mr Abrahams and why did he donate secretly?
He is a wealthy property developer from the North East who long links to the Labour Party: his father Bennie, who had a property business, was a Lord Mayor of Newcastle and he himself was briefly a Labour parliamentary candidate before being deselected in 1991. David Abrahams says that he simply wanted to help Labour but did not want the negative publicity attracted by many political donors. Critics say that as a developer, there are potential advantages in having an influence with Labour councils and the Government.
Who are the key Labour players in this row?
Mr Abrahams's third-party donations began in 2003, when Tony Blair was Prime Minister and Labour leader. The scale and frequency of donations increased after June, when Gordon Brown replaced him. Peter Watt quit as the party’s general secretary after admitting that he knew of the donations via middlemen.
Hilary Benn, one of the candidates for Labour deputy leader after Mr Blair and John Prescott stepped down, rejected a donation from one of Mr Abrahams’s proxies, although he then asked for, and accepted, a donation in Mr Abrahams’s name. The campaign team of Harriet Harman, the party chairman, approached Labour donors for money and took a £5,000 cheque from Janet Kidd, one of Mr Abrahams’s proxies.
Whose careers does it threaten?
Harriet Harman looks exposed, given that Hilary Benn’s team handled the issue of proxy donations more shrewdly, but she has support from Mr Brown and his allies. Any minister who turns out to have known that David Abrahams was behind the secret donations is at risk from the series of inquiries under way. Within the Labour party Jon Mendelsohn, the election fundraiser, also knew of the arrangement although claims he was unhappy and planned to change it.
How damaging is this to Gordon Brown?
Very. His pledge to usher in a new kind of politics and to rebuild voters’ trust has taken a battering. It is too bad that this arrangement began when Tony Blair was leader. Nor has he been given much credit for his tough response: the resignation of the party’s top official, repayment of the £600,000 and a series of inquiries. Gordon Brown and other Labour politicians have insisted they did not know of the illegal donations but cannot prove they did not. The electorate rarely gives politicians the benefit of the doubt.
How is Jon Mendelsohn, Labour's fund-raiser, involved?
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If this had not come out we would never have known that a wealthy property developer had made substantial donations to Labour, to the knowledge of a select few with influence in the party, some close to the time when he had a large project under labour council planning scrutiny , a planning application in which his own real name was not mentioned. It stinks to high heaven.
We know that Benn, Jay, Mendelsohn, and Watt knew about the practice. Watt and Mendelsohn lamely state that they thought it was ok. Jay clearly did not. Harman and husband and GB had absolutely no idea? It simply is not credible.
Why do they all now say the didn't know? Answer: because the offences under the relevant legislation have to be committed "knowingly". It is the only thing that they can say. So, the result is either "I broke the law" or "I am incompetent and don't know what's going on under my nose".
And no-one has resigned. That's modern politics for you.
Richard B, Brighton, east sussex
So Gordon Brown proposes new rules on party donations.
The existing rules (laws indeed) are clear enough, but fortunately for him (til now) not well enough policed.
The Labour government introduced these crystal clear laws in the first place. Are we to have our country run by such incompetent and untrustworthy people?
This exercise by Gordon Brown is a desperate smoke screen to avert attention from Labour party sleaze.
Steve, Braintree, UK
In a book written by Micahel Dodds in 2006 called First Lady a labour donor suggested that his large amount of money should be trickle fed into the labour party coffers by inflating the amount of the many smal donors who apparently contribite money regularly, The individual donors would receive thank for an unspecified amount and a the laarge donor would have his anonymity preserved. Where did his researchers get the idea from?
David Foxwell, Isleworth, U.K
I find it incredible if after appointing Jon Madelsohn to raise funds for an election, that Mr Brown has not discussed progress with him, and asked from where the donations are coming
K Wells, Bognor Regis Sussex, England
Power & Greed & Corruptible seed
t, r, i
i dought if hilary benn will be unemployed for long as labor mps tend to resign when there is a scandle and then take up other more lucrative posts, as with a few other disgraised labor mps. also on the instance of giving the money back are they going to refund the million they received in the cash for honours scandle ?
doubt it as that would be alot more than £600,000 . how can we trust mps when they make legislation and dont keep to it , having no knowledge is not good enough for a priminister he is responsible for his cabinate and so is ultimatley responsible.
april ray , horsham, west sussex
Lies, sleaze, incompetence and spin followed by Lies, sleaze, incompetence and spin.
New labour, Old Labour....What has changed under Brown?
Bill, Wales,