Michael Evans, Defence Editor
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday

All members of the special forces are to be guaranteed anonymity in death as well as throughout their lives as part of a new move to raise morale in the country’s most elite military units, The Times has learnt.
Defence sources said that the head of the special forces had intervened to demand a new no-identity policy because of concerns that morale was being damaged.
Coroners at inquests into the deaths of special forces’ members are to be told only to refer to them as Soldier A or Soldier B.
Families of members of the SAS and Special Boat Service (SBS) killed on operations in Iraq and Afghanistan or elsewhere had expressed anger that the Ministry of Defence appeared to have sanctioned the publishing of their names. They made it clear that having been obliged to maintain absolute secrecy about the role of their husbands, fathers or other relatives, it was unacceptable for names to be published after their deaths, making them vulnerable to unwelcome media attention.
Defence sources said that the SAS (motto "Who Dares Wins") and SBS ("By Strength and Guile") felt that it was wrong for their members to be treated like any other ordinary regiment when someone was killed.
The MoD seems to have been taken by surprise by the vehemence of the demands for anonymity in perpetuity. With the SAS and SBS playing crucial undercover roles in Iraq and Afghanistan, any suggestion of damaged morale has had to be taken with the utmost seriousness.
The surprise resignation last year of the commanding officer of 22 SAS, the Special Air Service’s regular army regiment, had been another cause of dismay. He had been a popular commander but defence sources said that he had a brush with the army hierarchy over his habit of going out on secret missions with his men when he visited Iraq, something that was frowned upon.
Highly attractive salaries offered by private security companies, particularly in Iraq, had also lured a number of key personnel away from the special forces. Although defence sources insisted this was not as a result of poor morale in the SAS and SBS, the offers of up to £800 a day to serve as private bodyguards in Iraq caused concerns at a time when the demand for Britain’s special forces’ expertise has never been greater.
Now a new policy keeping the names of SAS and SBS men secret for ever is expected to be announced by the Government later this month. The MoD and the Ministry of Justice have been involved in the secret discussions.
The intervention of the new Director Special Forces who is, for the first time, a major-general – the appointment in the past has been held by a lower-ranked brigadier – seems to have been the crucial factor.
He is understood to have pointed out that all the members of the elite units have to sign a strict confidentiality agreement which bans them from ever writing or speaking about their clandestine missions. In return, he felt that the MoD owed it to them to keep their names secret, even after their deaths.
The confidentiality contracts were introduced after several books were written by former special forces soldiers about their careers. The most notable one was Bravo Two Zero, the blockbuster by Andy McNab about a failed SAS mission in the 1991 Gulf War.
The MoD has always maintained an official policy of never commenting about special forces operations. However, whenever the SAS or SBS have been engaged in a particular incident, with subsequent fatalities, the involvement of special forces troops has often leaked out. As a consequence, the MoD has allowed the names of individual members of the special forces to be published posthumously, although the traditional policy has been to give a serviceman’s original unit, such as The Parachute Regiment or Royal Marines.
The last incident in which members of the SAS were killed was on November 20 when two soldiers from the regiment died in an RAF Puma helicopter crash near Baghdad. Normally, like any other Service personnel killed on operational duty, they would have been identified. However, for the first time, neither of the two SAS men was named, indicating that the new policy has effectively already started.
The decision to promote the Director Special Forces from brigadier to major-general followed the significant expansion of the organisation under his command. The SAS and SBS have been joined in the past 20 months by the newly formed Special Forces Support Group, which is based around the 1st Battalion The Parachute Regiment, and the Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR), expert in covert surveillance.
However, the only other special forces unit that is expected to be covered by the proposed anonymity-in-perpetuity policy is the SRR, whose members picked up their surveillance skills during undercover missions against terrorists in Northern Ireland.

Covert missions in Iraq and Afghanistan
— The SAS has responsibility for covert missions in Iraq, hunting al-Qaeda fighters, alongside its American counterparts
— The most important SAS mission in Iraq was its part in uncovering the whereabouts of Saddam Hussein’s two sons, Uday and Qusay, in Mosul in 2003
— It is claimed that up to seven SAS men have been killed in Iraq. One of those was a signals expert who was on the RAF Hercules shot down by ground fire while flying from Baghdad to Balad, a US base, in January 2005, with the loss of ten British servicemen
— The SBS is mostly operating in Afghanistan
— The most important SBS mission in Afghanistan was in 2001, when al-Qaeda and Taleban detainees held in an old fort at Qala-i-Jangi seized weapons and went on the rampage. A small unit played a key role in fighting back and saving the life of a captured CIA man. The NCO who commanded the unit was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honour
— Both the SAS and SBS were involved in flushing out hundreds of al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters from their cave hideouts in eastern Afghanistan in late 2001
— The SAS and SBS were also involved in the search for Osama bin Laden during the same period
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Peter K, well said that man. They do things that even ordinary soldiers would want to walk away from, four man groups, no ground support, little logistics. Now at least if the worst happens the families left behind are allowed to have peace from the media. Those families already have had to go through not knowing when they will have to say goodbye for a mission, or how long it will be, or even if they'll see each other again. Then the worst happens, the last thing the family need is some reporter from a red top trying to get dirt on the regiment and the SBS.
Tim Hamilton, Chatham, UK
The SAS, SBS and indeed most of the British armed forces are too good for this country. They are underfunded, badly housed, treated with disdain and given a total lack of respect.
To protect their id's is the least we can do.
p, phillips, birmingham,
To Peter K: Damn right and well said.
Shane Stevens, London, UK
Good. Nice to see the new PM and his Cabinet have the guts to protect those who bravely serve the civilised world in its fight against the barbarians.
eddiebear, St. Louis, MO, USA
To Martin B-Edwards: I had the misfortune of living in the Eastern Bloc during the 1980's and am lucky to have escaped with my life, so don't make adolescent comments about the Stasi when you have no idea what it's like living with a real police state's moronic death-stare boring into the back of your head 24 hours a day. Protecting the anonymity of special forces servicemen not only insulates them from the sledging of ungrateful and unpatriotic armchair politicians such as yourself, it also acknowledges their hard work and sacrifices in the face of horrors that most of us only know from films. British media being as hostile and intrusive as it is, I think this is a fine example of the old-fashioned respect for privacy and restraint that was once so typical of the UK and seems to be on the way out. What is abhorrent is not this discussion, but your lack of gratitude to the very people who put their lives on the line protecting your right to express your knee-jerk socialist opinions.
Peter K, London, UK
Martin Baldwin-Edwards, Athens, Greece "Anonymity after death...interesting. Did this idea come from the East German stasi, perhaps?"
NO - as clearly stated in the article the request came from the families of regimental members
glenn ex-pat, Auckland, NZ
Anonymity after death...interesting. Did this idea come from the East German stasi, perhaps? Or is the principle merely that confidential work for the state gives special privileges which ordinary people are not entitled to? The whole discussion is abhorrent, and prepares the ground for a police state mentality.
Martin Baldwin-Edwards, Athens, Greece
This new policy is as it should be; it should also apply to deceased officers of SIS (MI6) and the Security Service (MI5). The increasing number of obituaries giving the names and career details of SIS officers is not conducive to good order and morale. Secret services are just that - secret - and must be to the grave.
a retired SIS officer, London,