Magnus Linklater and Dominic Kennedy
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
To the team from the Air Warfare Centre, a jaunt to rural Wales to monitor the
effect of wind farms on radar should have been a routine and pleasant
mission.
Two elderly RAF planes were spared for the experiment and their pilots ordered
to do figures-of-eight around some windmills to see if they were visible as
dots on screens.
The defence experts discovered an alarming threat to national security from
wind farms which now seriously jeopardises the expansion of this mode of
green energy. Experts knew that there was a tiny area around wind farms
where low lying planes are difficult to see by radar and this exercise was
designed to measure the extent of the problem.
One of the team noticed an aeroplane, not part of the experiment, which was
flying over the turbines but failed to be picked up on the screens.
The pilots of the Chinook HC Mk 2 and Tucano T Mk 1 were given new orders to
fly directly over the Llandinam wind farm in South Wales at various
altitudes. The planes became quite invisible. A follow-up experiment
confirmed that there is a blind spot over wind farms which makes aircraft
undetectable by radar.
The discovery has left ministers with a dreadful dilemma. Britain is relying
on a huge increase in wind power to help to reduce carbon emissions and so
meet targets to prevent catastrophic climate change. But the defence of the
skies has become all the more urgent since 9/11 when terrorists shocked
America by commandeering four commercial flights.
President Bush has claimed that the CIA foiled a massacre plot to crash
aircraft into the towers of Canary Wharf in East London. If the RAF has to
be scrambled to save Britain from such peril, every second of advance
warning will count.
The revolution in the Ministry of Defence’s thinking on radar air defence was
disclosed by Squadron Leader Chris Breedon in his evidence opposing a new
wind farm in North-umbria. “Traditionally, the primary role of the Air
Surveillance and Control System has been to detect aircraft approaching the
UK from overseas. However, equal, if not more, importance is now given to
monitoring UK airspace to detect, track and respond to any aircraft which is
giving concern.
“The significance of the low-level radar cover has risen markedly as a result
of the terrorist events of September 11, 2001. The MoD is extremely
concerned with any proposed wind turbine development which would have an
impact on the . . . system.”
Put simply, the operators are less worried about looking for enemy aircraft
approaching from overseas. The real threat is over our heads. The full
results of the tests remain classified.
Wind farms confuse radar because the turbines are mistaken for planes. They
are high and have rotating blades which can mimic the effect of aircraft
when detected by radio waves. The British Wind Energy Association says that
the existing 165 farms produce enough energy for 1.3 million homes and save
5 million tonnes of carbon a year. Ministers were faced with a choice of
disasters to avert. Mass terrorist attack or calamitous rise in temperatures?
The MoD is raising last-minute objections to wind farms at Hexham and
Kirkwhelpington in Northumberland, Berwick-upon-Tweed and the Lammermuir
Hills in the Scottish Borders, Routh in the East Riding of Yorkshire,
Thorney near Peterbor-ough and Ceres in Fife. Campaigners for wind farms are
suspicious that the MoD has adopted a hardline policy some time after the
scientific evidence was discovered. Experiments which found that radar has
blind spots over wind farms were completed in September 2004 and April 2005.
In May 2005 the MoD confirmed it had no objections to a proposal for 62
turbines up to 125m high at Fallago Rig in the Lammermuirs. But in March
2007 it objected to a smaller plan for 48 turbines.
The MoD said in documents for a public inquiry: “The [air surveillance system]
has received firm direction from the Chief of the Defence Staff on the
minimum acceptable surveillance coverage and this informs the objection to
the wind turbine development. That directed surveillance coverage is
required to undertake counter-terror-ist operations against airborne threats
and allow tactical decisions to be taken as situations develop. A degraded
or inaccurate picture could delay, or even negate, appropriate actions.”
The blind spots can arise even at long distances from radar stations and the
MoD is studying all proposed wind farms in the “line of sight” of their
monitors. The ministry declined to say how far the line of sight can be.
Security objections threaten to scupper the new age of wind power. Yet in
December the Energy Secretary, John Hutton, announced that Britain wants a
60-fold increase in wind energy by 2020. A new radar system called T102 is
due to be introduced in two of Britain’s six monitoring stations – at
Trimingham in Norfolk and Brizlee Wood in Northumberland.
The Chief of Defence Staff’s insistence that there must be no degradation of
radar cover appears irreconcilable with the country’s energy ambitions. So The
Times asked the MoD if it had been given a copy of Mr Hutton’s
announcement for advance clearance. A spokesman replied: “We’re in close
consultation.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If the government took seriously the threat of a terrorist attack on the UK by a rogue AC we would have a set of decent wind farm mitigating radars in place. Unfortunately the MoD has allocated only a pittance to the RAF to pay for 2 low spec T102 radars when much better alternatives were available. A bit of foresight by HM government would have saved the taxpayer a pretty penny and also equipped the RAF with a decent RADAR system.
Norm Peters, Bedford, UK
I do wish people would not make pseudo-authoratitive statements about matters they do not fully understand. Better to seek to find the truth than to get to a point of scant and prejudiced knowledge and presume to educate the rest of the population. It is with this in mind the comments above should all be viewed.
ian fletcher, faringdon, UK
What a nonsense windfarms are. They produce no electricity when there's no wind, none when there's too much and what pathetic amount they do produce is too erratic to be worthwhile. The lack of predictable and continuous supply makes the whole wind programme a complete waste of time. Where would we be without coal or nuclear power stations to provide us with the power we need for the 80% or more of the time that the wind turbines produce nothing? And as we all know, what they do produce is at great profit for a very few and great expense to the rest of us. The whole windfarm programme (incidentally, why on earth are they called "farms" ? They don't "farm" anything at all. Another example of green propaganda. They should be called "wind operated power stations", because that is precisely what they are) should be dropped immediately.
Michael, Northampton, England
Having a functioning wind farm might be a start. The British Wind Energy Association is being economical with the truth - "The British Wind Energy Association says that the existing 165 farms produce enough energy for 1.3 million homes and save 5 million tonnes of carbon a year." They may well have the potential but this is not usable energy - ask the Danes.
David G, Carshalton,
There's nothing irreconcilable at all. It is perfectly possible to have functioning radars *and* wind farms. However, it would require the government to provide funding to the MOD to update the radar signal processing to cope with the signals from wind farms. Such capabilities already exist in other commercially available military radar systems. It smells more of a half-hearted attempt to introduce greener electricity. If introducing wind farms implies additional funding to the MOD to maintain their capabilities, then so be it. That's part of the cost of going green.
Arnold Wilkins, Daventry, UK
This really should be a no-brainer. Wind farms are only "viable" because of the vast hidden subsidies they receive, (which lead inexorably to inflated energy bills, disproportionately affecting the poor) only ever operate at a fraction of their claimed capacity, do nothing to prevent "climate change" (if indeed there is such a thing as anthropogenic global warming - contrary to what the alarmists screech, there is no scientific consensus about this) and despoil our most precious landscapes. Now we find they leave us vulnerable to air attack - what more does it take for government to realise the whole wind farm scam is a ghastly mistake and abandon this fiasco? They should free themselves from the wholly malign influence of the British Wind Energy Association - one of the nastiest bunches of rent seekers and subsidy farmers ever to disfigure our business and political scenes.
Paul, Cardiff, UK