Hannah Strange
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona

It is perhaps most feverishly imagined divorce hearing ever seen in the British courts: the cross-examination of Paul McCartney, the former Beatle, by Heather Mills, his volatile wife of four years vying for a hefty slice of his considerable fortune.
Today, after a six-day hearing behind closed doors at London’s High Court, Ms Mills and Mr McCartney moved one step closer to a lurid public airing of their four-year marriage after apparently failing to reach a settlement.
Speaking as he left the court this morning, Nicholas Mostyn, the lawyer representing Mr McCartney, confirmed that Judge Hugh Bennett had retired to consider the case and would give his ruling in several weeks’ time.
Unsourced newspaper reports at the weekend had claimed that the couple had thrashed out a deal between each other, but the reserved judgement confirms otherwise.
Should either side disagree with the ruling, the case would then go to the Court of Appeal, where it would be heard in public. The former Beatle is said to want to avoid such a media spectacle but Ms Mills has made no secret of the fact she considers herself the victim in their marriage and would willingly seek redress in a public forum.
The High Court judgement will remain private, unless the pair decide otherwise.
Mr McCartney, 65, and Ms Mills, 40, announced their separation in May 2006 after four years of marriage during which they had a daughter, Beatrice, now aged four. The musician then filed for divorce on the grounds of unreasonable behaviour on his wife’s part.
They have been in legal discussions ever since to determine how much the former model turned charity campaigner would receive from Mr McCartney’s estimated £825 million fortune. The wrangling has seen Ms Mills, derided in the tabloid press as an emotionally unstable banshee, break down in tears on television and publicly accuse her husband of alcoholism and abuse.
Ms Mills was beaming today as she left the court with her entourage. Mr McCartney did not attend, although he was in court to face his estranged wife every day last week. He was believed to be rehearsing for the Brit Awards on Wednesday, where he is due to perform a medley of hits.
Subject to a strict confidentiality order, the pair revealed nothing about proceedings to the media camped outside the court, but it emerged that Ms Mills was acting for herself after a falling out with her law firm, Mischcon de Reya, and as such would cross-examine her husband herself.
Media reports have suggested Mr McCartney offered his wife around £25 million, but that she is seeking around double that amount. Other points of contention are said to include provisions for Ms Mills’ security and the inclusion of a confidentiality clause preventing her from selling her story to the media, or co-operating with a film or book about the marriage.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If only the American media would restrain itself and not facilitate her career when & if she leaves England.
Margaret Henry Pokusa, Alexandria, VA
Why is it that a wife feels entitled to her husband's wealth? If she contributed to his income during the marriage then some amicable split seems warranted...but for Heather to want 100 million pounds or more for a 4-year marriage borders on insanity. Obviously, as a woman, I'd be thinking only of the child. Set HER up for life. Why should Paul pay for 24 hour security? What death threats is she talking about? Has ANY real threat been reported to the courts? And as a mom, I'm appalled that Heather may be allowed to leave the UK? This would be harmful to little Bea, Paul and the entire Mccartney clan. I can only hope the judge sees Heather for what she truly is.... a goldigger of the worst kind. There's no reason she should be given anymore than 10 million pounds (and be damned thankful she gets that) and have annual installments made for Bea...money Heather can never have access to. Truly heartbreaking and bizarre. Sara
sara b, bergen, NJ USA
I hear the words of the readers, but I still believe that the intent remain the same.Beatrice should prevail! Let the gag order be put into place. There are always two sides to every story ! Let's get real...there are pictures of the mother demanding attention and the father staying silent, (probably under his lawyers advise)What should be heard is NOTHING but the judge's ruling.Then leave the boxing ring as a lady and a gentlemen. Within a short period of time this should be washed under the rug and each parent will have gone on their way to enter into future endeavors.
My words should be heeded, Remember the child! History has already been written! Please try to provide a calmer enviorment. Let the anger dissapate/Your daughter will be more respectful of both of you, and after all isn't that what she deserves. A future without her parents baggage.
It is her turn to be a kid,carefree, happy and loving to both parents. Haveagreatday5!
Linda -No. Miami Beach, Florida USA
Linda, North Miami Beach, USA-Florida
Heather has won. A reserved judgement can hardly contain a "gagging order".
Phil Payne, Sheffield,
Heather Mills is a clown and a sad poster board for women everywhere.
It is my hope that justice will prevail and she'll have what she deserves: nothing.
jamie, chi, USA
Sad day for women as Heather smiles about her giant payday.
Not caring about Bea who will grow up and know what her
mother did to get such a large sum. Never mind Bea will see
the pictures of her mother in the papers. Never mind because
Heather got what she wanted , money. But it won't buy
her dignity or respect she will never have that.
Liz, Mission KS, USA
Take her to appeal court. Let her drown herself. If she wins, sue her for defamation of every single derogatory statement against him, past and present.
Bob, Seaside, OR USA
Oh, come on, Paul. Sure, it gripes like hell, but if you've got 825 million quid, let 'er have fifty. Life is too short.
JimBob, Los Angeles, CA, USA