Hannah Strange
Win VIP tickets
A internet-dater who sent naked photos of his online girlfriend to everyone in her e-mail address book in a fit of jealous rage was today facing a possible jail sentence.
Stephen Hailes, 48, took his revenge after discovering that Karen Parker, 36, with whom he had developed an online relationship, was also flirting with other male web-surfers.
Magistrates heard that the pair met in an internet chatroom and after a period of flirtation Mrs Parker, a married mother of two, sent Hailes a series of provocative photos, some featuring her completely nude and others posed in sexy lingerie.
At some point in their online romance he became suspicious that she was contacting other men and logged into her Hotmail account using the password that she had previously given him.
Crushed when his fears were confirmed, Hailes decided to avenge his broken heart by forwarding the revealing shots to all her e-mail contacts, the court heard.
The unemployed Gloucester tree surgeon was told he could be sent to prison when he is sentenced next month, after he pleaded guilty to sending indecent photos by a public communication network.
Prosecutor Sharon Jomaa said Mrs Parker, who works in a supermarket, only discovered what Hailes had done when friends called her to ask why she had sent them the risqué photos. Shortly afterwards, she contacted the police.
”In the police interview the defendant said that he wanted her husband to realise what sort of woman his wife was,” she told the court.
Nick Cooper, for the defence, apportioned some of the blame to Mrs Parker herself, who, he said, had sent the risqué snaps of her own volition.
"Mrs Parker acted most inappropriately and to some extent was the author of her own misfortune,” he said.
"He admits flirting with her on the internet and then, to his surprise, he received photographs of her naked - he had not asked for them.
"He forwarded the photographs out of jealousy and upset, but Mrs Parker must accept some degree of culpability. My client wants to have nothing more to do with her."
Speaking after the hearing yesterday, Hailes told how he and Mrs Parker, of Worthing in West Sussex, would chat for hours online and over the telephone.
But when the dad-of-one confronted her with suspicions of her “cheating” during a New Year’s Eve phone call, she told him to leave her alone as he was becoming "obsessed". He later sent her flowers and a card but his advances were ignored.
After seeing the messages to other men, an enraged Hailes rang her husband Colin, an RAC worker, in mid-January and told him about the explicit photos she had sent. He had spoken to him on the phone before when ringing to speak to Mrs Parker and he seemed like a "nice guy," he said.
He said he would forward them from her email account as proof, but claims he accidentally hit "send all" in her address book and inadvertently sent them to 15 recipients.
The spurned surfer said he felt he had been victimised for a mistake he made ”in the heat of the moment”.
He said:”I can’t believe what’s happened. I really liked her and thought we may have something special together. It’s such a shame it’s ended like this.”
”I don’t see why I could go to prison for sending these rude pictures of her, when she made the rude pictures and sent them in the first place. She gave me the ammunition.
”It was a silly mistake. I was jealous and upset, but I honestly never meant to hurt anyone.”
Hailes was told to return to Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court on March 19 to be sentenced.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The CPS has clearly lost the plot. What a waste of public money. I suggest Stephen Hailes reports Mrs Parker to the police for sending indecent photos by a public communication network. I fail to see how the police or the CPS could refuse to prosecute. He's legal representation must of been inadequate to get into this sorry state. I'm still holding out on the legal system realising that this is an injustice, A custodial sentence will publicise this farse even more.... I suspect neither side wants this.
Keith, Northampton, Northants
All the people involved in this should have known better. If someone's 'flirting' with you on line then they're probably 'flirting' with other people in the same way. The whole thing is a storm in a tea cup in my opinion - leave them to sort out their own sad lives
Jill, Boston, UK
The reality is that there are many kooks on chat lines. We warn our kids about them. Yes, she sent him pictures - that he says he didn't ask for. There is no mention here of what she said. But, the fact that he was trying to be malicious and somewhat of a stalker and decided to break into her account and send to everyone was all his fault. He didn't have to do that.
He clearly has emotional issues as well and is out of touch with reality. Probably why he is searching for love on a chat forum.
He says, he was just rying to send to the husband but sent to all by mistake. First off, he could have sent the photo from his email account. He had them. Second, unless you purposely put all the email addresses into the send line, you can't send to all. You can only reply to all if you receive an email. So clearly he is being deceptive and lying here.
He is going to get what he deserves. They won't give him a sentence, but probably a fine, probation and community service.
Paul, Toronto, Canada
Forgive me if this is obvious, but doesn't it stand to reason that when you send pictures of yourself (or ones of this nature anyway) to people you don't, or do, know, then odds are it will find its way to other people. If this woman is so upset by this, maybe she shouldn't have been cheating on her husband over the internet in the first place?
Tom, Manchester, England
Surely this woman is also guilty of: sending indecent photos by a public communication network??
Is she NOT going to be prosecuted as well? Or is it one rule for men and another for the women here?
I also thought it was not possible to prosecute someone for an illegal act perpetrated following a prior illegal act.
i.e theft of previously stolen goods is not prosecutable.
So, applying similar reasoning - no prosecution can be executed against the sending of indecent pictures by the man as they were received from the woman by illegal means.
Obviously I must be missing something here but given the little information we have I think my logic seems reasonable.
Nathan, Inverness, UK
If you send pictures of yourself naked over the internet you are either an exhibitionist or criminaly stupid, I suspect the latter applies in this case.
Andy, France,
Erm .... just a minute. He is being prosecuted for sending indecent photgraphs via a public communication medium? But she initially sent the photographs to him? Presumably they will both be expecting a jail sentence? That in itself is rediculous. In the end, we will all have been locked up for something. Has anybody heard of internet pornography? How many people daily view that via a 'public communication medium'? We need another 30 million prison places.
This woman was playing with emotions of a genuine man, sorry men. He's silly for not realising that almost any woman contacted this way will be doing just the same. It fills their idle hours. He should be compensated, not punished.
Norman S., Crawley, UK
This is clearly bonkers....
She acted very stupidly sending, unsolicited, the pictures in the first place. She obviously has little consideration for her husband. SHe was also very stupid to give out her email password.
The bloke then acted stupidly by rashly logging into her email account (even though he'd been given the password by her), and forwarding her pictures to her friends.
But, it's patently ridiculous that this bloke should now be facing a jail term. He's messed up, for sure, but he's no threat to society bu any means.
The prison cell should be used instead for the very very many others who pose a *real* threat and nuisance to the communities in which they live. We're forever hearing about violent crimes which result in non-custodial sentences, or dangerous or careless drivers, even those who kill through their actions, receiving just measly fines.
The law, CPS and judiciary in this country can, at times, be ridiculous, and it's our great loss.
Toby Rothwell, London,