Professor Ronald Hutton
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Britishness has always been Englishness writ large: the English are 80 per cent of the population. The task for the other nations of our islands was to be British without being trampled upon by the English elephant.
The Scots would deal with this predicament by inventing Britishness. It was a Scot who invented the character of John Bull, a Scot composed the national anthem, a Scot posted Nelson’s signal at Trafalgar: “England expects that every man will do his duty.”
The Scots were part of the process that forged British identity, throughout much of which the English were ruled by other nations. Left to their own fiendish devices, they might well have exterminated the Scots, not to mention the Welsh, but that process was halted by the takeover of the English state, first by the Normans, then by a French royal family, the Planta-genets.
In the longer term, rule by the French forced the English to look outwards, to turn towards Europe. It convinced them that they had to be Europeans.
Probably the most crucial period for British identity would be the 18th century: that is when the people of this island came together and decided to be British; that is when Britishness was really invented.
Empire left us a treasure house of possessions. We have material wealth, we are the fourth most powerful trading nation, the fourth-greatest military power, but more than that, Empire left us with one of the most multicultural societies in the world.
Because we are an island of four languages – English, Welsh, Scottish and Gaelic – we have made communication our greatest achievement. We dislike the arts of display, we took hundreds of years to learn to make music and paint, but our writers have produced the world’s greatest literature.
Because we also love understatement, we do not glorify these writers. Here is a trivia question: where is the public statue of Shakespeare in London? There is only one, on the Albert Memorial, where the Bard sits at the feet of Homer. The greatest writer in the world and we put him beneath a long dead Greek.
Despite our military successes throughout history, our military heroes have not been turned into political leaders, nor are our drawing rooms filled with men in uniform. Our policemen have a civilian attire: they dress like postmen.
We are fearful of getting in one another’s way, we are lovers of privacy. The greatest British institutions are the clubs, of which we have had more than any other nation, and the sports field, from which are drawn the metaphors for British values. T.S. Eliot identified 13 characteristics that were distinctively British: eight were connected with sport.
We are equally reluctant to disturb others: Eastern European states spent much of their histories expelling various minorities; in Britain we do it rarely. The last half-century of large-scale immigration has drawn out a longer thread: the British have forever grumbled about foreigners but welcomed them in.
Reduced, after an age of empire, to our own island, Britain’s advantages continue, and with them, an aware-ness that we have had throughout our history: that the only way for the British to continue to thrive is to get on with others. That is why the greatest British fear, that of offending someone, really matters.
Ronald Hutton is Professor of History at Bristol University
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Compare energy prices from suppliers

2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sounds like you've been reading the SNP party manifesto. The truth is that England would be far better off out of the UK. We are the ones subsidising the rest, which is why independence is more popular in England,than the rest of the UK
Scotland would be undoubtedly better off economically and socially out of the Union. England would be marginally worse off economically
Paul, Bucks, England
I'm sorry, but this is a very partial view of British history.
As a people, we are terrible communicators; the only language the majority of us use with any skill is English, and this gained it's ubiquity by the simple expedient of us battering anyone who wouldn't use it (whether Celt or Johnny foreigner) into submission.
England's long wars of aggression against France and Ireland and, later, Britain's unending colonial and trade wars are not symptomatic of a shy and retiring people falling over themselves to get on with their neighbours. In addition, we should surely counter balance any list of the benefits of Empire with many of its less welcome consequences: racism, unwillingness to engage with Europe, identity crisis, etc. The only part of the article with which I agree is that the Scots were part of the process that forged British identity, for both good and bad.
The article ends with a truism: survival requires cooperation! Fine! Isn't that true for all humanity?
Charles Addison, Glasgow,
Professor Hutton makes the little recognised but accurate point that Britishness was invented and promoted by the Scots as the lesser of two evils (the other one being subsumed by England). Now Britishness has gone out of fashion in Scotland, and no wonder.
Scotland probably got a decent deal out of the UK in the Empire era, as the city centres of Glasgow and Aberdeen attest in stone. But for the last century Scotland has had a terrible deal out of the UK, as a cursory review of population statistics will show (Scotland's population actually fell due to mass emigration during the post war baby boom era.)
Scotland would be undoubtedly better off economically and socially out of the Union. England would be marginally worse off economically, but it got over the independence of Ireland, and Scotland would be little different.. It is trying to keep the lid on this basic truth that has turned the Labour party in knots over Britishness.
Gordon, Aberdeen, Scotland
Of course, the real problem is that the creation of British Identity was a PR job. James Thomson, a Scot, wrote Rule Britannia; so, yes, Scots did participate in the creation of Britishness (as Robert Crawford sought to show in his 'Devolving English Literature'). However, it can be argued that Britishness has not always been easy to define and attempts to do so often run up against diverse communities across Britain who do not feel that this or that view of Britishness reflects them; this is true of black and muslim communities, as well as of many Scots, Welsh, and Norhtern Irish communities. Should Scotland become independent, I would feel no less British; because I was brought up in Scotland, in the British State. I do not feel any great allegiance to either, though I feel 'Scottish' insofar as I have lived in Scottish communities all my life. The notion of allegiance seems to want to address the fear of losing one's identity in an age of change; understandable, but wrong.
Gregor Addison, Glasgow, Scotland
It is a privilege to be British. Our education system, our democracy, our cuisine, our manners, our weather and our language are just a few of the great things about Britishness.I wouldn`t want to live anywhere but Britain and although I love travelling there`s nothing quite like touching down in GB and being home. Our friendliness and our hospitality are renowned throughout the world and what greater quality is there than an ability to get on with others in peace and harmony. Proud to be a Brit !
Jo Sullivan, Liverpool, Merseyside