Michael Smith
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Read Mick Smith's defence blog
BRITISH troops are to scale back attacks on the Taliban after killing 7,000 insurgents in two years of conflict, defence sources said last week.
British paratroopers have returned to southern Afghanistan in increased numbers this month. For the first time, members from every battalion of the regiment will be fighting together on one battlefront.
The paratroopers of 16 Air Assault Brigade killed at least 1,000 Taliban during their first deployment to Helmand province in 2006. Since then another 6,000 Taliban insurgents have been killed by British troops, the sources said.
The paratroopers’ commanders hope they can cut the deaths, which they fear are a boost for the Taliban when fighters recruited from the local population are killed, as the dead insurgent’s family then feels a debt of honour to take up arms against British soldiers.
The resultant fighting raises the profile of the Taliban and enhances their reputation in the local community.
“We aim to scale back our response to incidents to avoid getting sucked into a cycle of violence among local tribesmen,” said one officer. “This way we aim to continue the process of reducing the Taliban’s influence in Helmand.”
The army hopes that the reduction in violence will enable the Department for International Development and its American counterpart USAID to accelerate reconstruction work. British commanders have expressed frustration at the limited amount of development and the reluctance of DfID to become involved.
However, US marines and British special forces will continue attacks on high-level Taliban leaders crossing the border from Pakistan.
More than 1,000 American troops from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit will take control of the border between Helmand and Pakistan later this month. They will concentrate on providing the firepower to kill Taliban leaders as they cross the border from their base in the Pakistani city of Quetta.
The US marines will work with the British Special Forces Support Group and Special Boat Service commandos who are tracking Taliban crossing the border. They will use the firepower of their M1A1 Abrams tanks and AH-1W Cobra helicopter gunships to launch a frontal assault on the hardliners.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Unfortunately Col in Seattle as in most insurgencies it isn't as simple as that. I can remember a TV interview with a British army officer standing in an Afghan village a couple of years ago. He said that there was a lot of Afghan "civilians" in the village on that day who weren't civilians the previous day (Taliban). Rather like in Vietnam it was very difficult to differentiate between those who were "gooks" and those who weren't.
Stephen Jones, Chester, United Kingdom
Brian, from Chicago, IL, fails to understand counterinsurgency warfare. Citing WWII as an argument to increase offensive operations in Helmand in 2008 is so misinformed as to be ridiculous.
While I do not argue that "violence never solves anything," violence alone cannot solve an insurgency. By all means, strong, decisive, targeted military actions are needed. Brian need not worry; the SBS will take care of that. But military force alone cannot solve a political problem - why Afghans are fighting against their own state.
By encouraging reconstruction, economic regeneration and hopefully political integration, the British forces are doing exactly the right thing.
Adam S. Goodwin, Shebdon, UK
More give up and surrender talk from the British. Just like in Southern Iraq where the Iraqis had learned they couldn't be counted on either. We had to clean up their mess they left there and looks like they still haven't learned their lesson.
Paul, Raleigh, NC USA
Strange article. Can you imagine The Times war coverage in WWII lamenting the fact that UK troops had killed too many enemy?
This silly modern belief that killing your enemy only makes more enemy is an argument for paralysis. It is the genesis of the UK's prior failed negotiations with the Taliban in the south and its failed tactics in Basra, Iraq. This belief arises out of the fallacy that war (violence) never solves anything. WWII proves that wrong.
Britain, please shake off this silliness. The West still needs your strength. Redouble your efforts to kill your Taliban foes and trust that perseverance and skill of arms will deliver Afghanistan into a brighter future.
Brian, Chicago, USA
This story is inacurate at best. The 24th MEU Marines will not secure a border nor will they work side-by-side tracking "Taliban" across the border. The 24th MEU will act as a thaetre task force for the ISAF Commander. Furthermore, the overall mission of the MEU Marines is to provide an environment of stability in which the people of Afghanistan can prosper.
roger, Kandahar, Afghanistan
Go Brits!
steve, new york, usa
The term "Taliban" is a generic reference to the insurgents who are a combination of Taliban fighters and foreign jihadi's who operate in Southeastern Afghanistan and Western Pakistan. The rules of engagement are relatively straight-forward and the British/NATO soldiers return fire when they are fired upon. I don't recall Bin Laden or Mullah Omar asking for peace negotiations. I do read about suicide bombers, beheadings and using civilians as shields. The Taliban's history in Afghanistan is ruthless as evidenced by the Friday afternoon exectutions and mutilations in the Kabul Soccer stadium. Nothing like seeing a few heads roll or hands chopped off because their beard wasn't long enough or they played a musical instrument, etc. The world will be a better place when the Taliban movement grows stale. The region will never prosper until tolerance, education + economic opportunities take root. The Taliban + Al Qaeda will never be able to deliver that to the war torn Afghan people.
robertzm, Virginia, USA
I imagine it's fairly simple to identify the taliban: they are aiming guns at nato soldiers. it would be better if the afghan government could engage the taliban in the south and east of the country, as only the afghanis can settle this conflict.
col, seattle, usa
they need to create defenable towns same as in Malaya to prevent forced conscription.
Rob, London,
Wow! Nice to know the kill stats on Taliban. Almost seems that anyone labelled 'taliban' is not human but simply cannon fodder. How do you figure a taliban anyway, they share the same DNA profiles? Wear their turbans in a specific way? Speak Taliban?! What nonsense, you do not know why you're in Afghanistan.
Kil kill kill, you'll all carry on till everyone is dead. What's the point? You tried talking to them instead?
hasan zehn, Birmingham, UK
According to the UK Defence Minister British troops in Afghanistan fired 4 million rounds ammunition in less then one year in Helmand. Thats almost 12,000 rounds of small arms every day by the 7,800 UK Armed Forces. So 8 million rounds in 2 years and 7,000 dead Taliban is almost 11,500 rounds per one Taliban.
Now I know why the price of lead has gone up so much.
mohsen, malaga, spain