You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Building all new homes to be flood resistant and establishing who is responsible for drainage are two of the key proposals in a new report into last summer's devastating floods.
Sir Michael Pitt was commissioned by the Government to analyse what went wrong in the disaster last June and July, which left 13 people dead.
The floods forced thousands from their homes and caused £3 billion of damage in Yorkshire, Humberside, the Midlands and the West Country.
Nearly 5,000 families have still not been able to return, partly because their homes were constructed with the wrong building materials, Sir Michael said this morning as he prepared to publish his final report later today.
“First of all, there’s the problem that when you do get water into a house because of flooding, if the water is there and it has to dry out, that can take a long period of time," he said. "That can take longer if the wrong building materials are used.”
Surface water which did not drain away caused much of the flooding last year, but tackling the standing water was made more complicated because often it was not clear who was responsible for the drains on high-risk sites.
There can be up to six owners responsible for one site. Sir Michael said that councils should compile electronic maps showing all ditches, streams and rivers, particularly around sites that are prone to flood.
"It is in businesses' commercial interest to provide more information about these high risk sites," he told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4.
"It means, first of all, that these companies must join in the planning process for flood emergencies, share the appropriate information about their infrastructure, and cooperate with flood planners well before the next flood takes place."
Sir Michael's interim report last December warned that flood planning should be on a par with fighting terrorism or a flu pandemic.
His final report contains 92 recommendations on how the country could be better equipped for a flood, without spending much more money. It argues that the Government’s £800 million flood defence budget for 2010/11 was “about right”, but a big difference could be made by spending the money more wisely.
It also recommends a clearer chain of command, with roles clearly set out. Councils should be in charge of seeing that drain networks are kept in a good state of repair.
The Met Office and the Environment Agency should set up a joint centre to issue flood warnings, which should be written in much simpler language, said Sir Michael, as the public found it hard to understand and react to some of the technical jargon used last year.
Householders in flood risk areas should be registered with the Environment Agency to receive flood warnings, and have an emergency kit in their homes.
Water and power firms should do more to safeguard key sites like electricity sub-stations, power generation plants and water treatment works. Hundreds of thousands of homes were left without clean running water for over a week after a treatment works was inundated in Gloucestershire.
Sir Michael said: “Implementing these recommendations will need powerful, Cabinet-level leadership. We can be much better prepared. In fact, we are already better prepared now than a year ago.”
Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary, said that the Government would learn the lessons of the floods.
“Sir Michael’s report is a wake-up call for us,” he told the Today programme. “We will of course look very carefully at all the recommendations in the report when he publishes it later today.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We build on plains because it is sensible to do so but when plains become floodplains we have a problem. However, building houses just one metre above ground level would solve the vast majority of the problems with a very little extra cost.
andrea ceccanti, london,
And the granting of planning permission on and the building of houses on flood-plains can hardly be a good thing - or am I missing something?
Derek, Southhampton , Uk
In the early 1950's when food was rationed and every acre of land was important, ditches were cleand out yearly. When rivers were in danger of flooding, draglines were brought in and the obstrutions like gravel beds and fallen trees were removed but now all thes things have been neglected .
Bernard Robinson, Hellifield, England
Hilary Ben: Sir Michaels report is a wake-up call for us, you (Labour) have been in power for 10 years, that id s long sleep!
Chris, London, UK
Council "snoopers" would be better employed keeping the drains clear.....
John, Colchester,
'powerful, Cabinet-level leadership' - highly unlikely from this government. Sir Michaels report is a wake-up call for us, , proving they are a dozey lot who have dithered over crucial infrastructure planning (e.g. more nuclear power stations) for far too long. They 'consult' rather than decide.
Tony Richards, Oxford, UK
I have long considered that the lack of maintenance with the drains/gulleys along roads is doing considerable damage to the ability to take surface water away. Today most gulleys are blocked with silt/waste/sand etc.
CLEAN them out as we did in years past.
john r turner, Leyland, United Kingdom
RE the last paragraph: 'we will look very carefully at all the recommendations........'Hillary Benn copyright 2008.....
Will they actually DO anything?
I can read demands for payment, but if I don't pay the bill, what changes?
Eh????
Less talk, more action please!
Rhys Jaggar, Leeds, UK