Joanna Sugden
Win VIP tickets

Sir Richard Branson’s airline Virgin Atlantic has today called for a review into the current rules which limit the liquids that passengers can take on board in their hand luggage.
The call came after a jury failed to decide whether or not a group of British Muslims were part of a plot to blow transatlantic airliners out of the sky using liquid explosives.
Three men were convicted of conspiracy to murder, but the jury was deadlocked on the central allegation - that terrorists planned to use liquid bombs to destroy aircraft en route from Heathrow to cities in the United States and Canada.
The arrests of the men had triggered strict rules on hand luggage which continue to cause delays and confusion at airports. Today, the government told The Times that it would maintain the rules.
However Paul Charles, Virgin's director of communications, said this afternoon that people were confused by different restrictions imposed by different airports.
He told BBC Online that “now is the time” for a review into the rules, which include flyers having to remove their belts, shoes and jackets before they go through security arches at airports. Many airports also prohibit passengers from carrying liquid beyond the security gate.
Mr Charles said: "Maybe now is the time for a review to take a look at how appropriate the current rules are for taking liquids on board an aircraft.
"Certainly it's important to have restrictions in place when the country is on the highest state of alert.
"There are different rules at different airports around the world, so it would make more sense to review all of these to make sure there's continuity worldwide."
Airport restrictions on liquids, which led to chaos in terminals across the world, were brought in after the arrests of the group in August 2006.
They led to travellers having to queue for hours, numerous flight delays and serious restrictions placed on hand luggage which saw only certain items allowed to be carried on board in a clear plastic bag.
Some of the rules remain the same today, including no liquid in containers larger than 100ml. The term includes drinks, syrups, creams, mascara, gels and pastes.
Peter Clarke, who headed Scotland Yard's Counter Terrorism Command when the plot allegations emerged, said restrictions on passengers carrying liquids on flights must remain.
A statement from the Department for Transport said: "The court case has proven that a generic capability exists to create liquid bombs from domestic items.
"Aircraft could be vulnerable to such devices so we are right to continue to require restrictions for liquids carried as hand luggage.
"We are also right to require these restrictions internationally as, potentially, we are all at risk.
"Meanwhile, we continue to work with international colleagues to develop technological detection methods which could ease the restrictions."
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Our party of 20 went through security with ease by complying with the restrictions. It was the people who did'nt that caused the delays by arguing with staff, then they want to repack their cases. We travel often and the amount of waste you see in the bins is awful. I would rather be safe.
Brenda, London, England
I was prevented from having clotted cream and a pot of jam in my hand luggage - neither of which are liquids. Not only is this utterly absurd but apparently these security "experts" can't tell the difference between a sandwich filling and an explosive.
I feel so safe.
Bill Smith, London, UK
Plastic handguns also exist, which can't be detected by X-ray machines, and modern explosives are odour-free, which makes them close to indetectable. So how exactly is the liquid ban improving security?? And how about metal glasses? Remove the plastic earpiece and voila: you have a 4 inch blade!
Bob, Edinburgh,
It has not been proven that household liquids could be combined to bring down a plane. It has been pointed out that the three household chemicals in question would have not been allowed through security in place before this incident. I fly often and am sick of security theater.
Chris, frankfurt, de
True there are more delays than there were five years ago however surely that needs to be addressed with a higher number of security staff at the airports which, on the whole, seems to be happening.
The public are not confused, on the contrary, the majority are now accustomerd to the new rulings.
Simon, Tunbridge Wells, Kent
I went through security recently with one tube of toothpaste and some eyedrops in a clear plastic zip-lock bag. They were confiscated because the bag was not "quart-sized" whatever that means. I'm sure that made the world a safer place. I would love to know where all the confiscated property goes.
Frank, abroad, abroad
It's about time these ridiculous rules were relaxed. They do NOT provide any additional security to passengers as many experts have pointed out. The disruption that the extra checks cause is disproportionate to the level of the threat and the usefulness of checks.
Danny, Sheffield,
Is this for real? It has been proven that liquids can be combined to make a bomb powerful enough to bring down a large airliner and, despite the ruling, there are people who are desperate enouh to want to do this - so why suggest that the travelling public should be put at risk?
Mike Carpenter, High Wycombe, UK
Personally, I would rather wait an extra ten, twenty, thirty minutes etc by going through the current safety checks then take the risk of someone managing to smuggle bombs/other harmful materials onto an aircraft.
Jade, Middlesbrough,