Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Britain is to spend £500 million on hundreds of heavily armoured vehicles to protect troops in Afghanistan.
The decision to acquire 600 vehicles that can withstand landmines and roadside bombs comes after criticism of the Ministry of Defence from the families of servicemen killed while on patrol in lightly armoured “Snatch” Land Rovers.
Susan Smith, from Tamworth in Staffordshire, whose 21-year-old son Private Phillip Hewett died in Iraq in 2005, is suing the MoD for providing vehicles that “gave little or no protection against improvised explosive devices”.
Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, has been negotiating with the Treasury over the plan to buy the 600 vehicles, which will partly replace the Land Rovers but also add to the stock of heavier troop-carrying systems in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is hoped that the new vehicles will be in place by next spring, in time for an expected resurgence of Taleban fighting.
The sense of urgency surrounding the provision of better protection for troops was underlined yesterday when it was confirmed that 100 of the 600 vehicles would replace the Viking armoured vehicles, which came into service with the Royal Marines in 2006 and have been deployed across Helmand province in southern Afghanistan. The Viking has proved to be vulnerable to landmines. About a dozen Viking drivers from the Royal Marines and the Queen’s Royal Lancers have been killed or seriously wounded by mine strikes, and steps were taken to thicken the armour under the driver’s seat.
Under the new proposal, the Vikings will be replaced by 100 better-protected “high-mobility tracked patrol vehicles”. The 500 other new vehicles will consist of 100 Mastiffs, a huge British-modified version of the American Cougar troop-carrier, 100 Jackals, a mine-resistant open-top vehicle, and 300 light-support mine-protected vehicles, which have not yet been identified.
General Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank, the former Chief of the Defence Staff and now a patron of the United Kingdom National Defence Association, which campaigns for better conditions for the Armed Forces, said: “Defence has been underfunded and risks have been taken with security and the size and equipping of our Armed Forces for many years. The Government has been forced by events and the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan to urgently find additional funding, but it is too little and too late. Despite repeated warnings our services are neglected and under-resourced. This has cost lives.”
When casualties occurred during attacks on Snatch Land Rovers in Iraq, the MoD began looking at other armoured vehicle options. However, in 2006, when British troops were deployed to Helmand province in Afghanistan, more than 100 Snatch Land Rovers went with them and, as in Iraq, proved vulnerable to explosive devices planted by the insurgents. Casualties continued to rise.
Corporal Sarah Bryant, 26, of the Intelligence Corps, and three SAS reservists, were killed on June 17 in a Land Rover hit by a landmine in Helmand. She was the first woman to die in action in Afghanistan.
A spokesman for the MoD said that Snatch Land Rovers would remain in Afghanistan and would still be used in certain circumstances. The Mastiffs, for example, are too big to manoeuvre down narrow streets. There are 85 Mastiffs already in Iraq and Afghanistan and 60 Jackals in Helmand province. An earlier order of vehicles — 175 Mastiffs, 70 Jackals and 150 Ridgbacks, a smaller version of the Mastiff — are on their way to Afghanistan.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Pacifying the taliban in Afghanistan has become absolutely central to the UK defence mission. The pull-out-now option is a knee-jerk reaction to what has undeniably been a difficult campaign. If we pull out too early the Afghan state will collapse and become a terrorist haven. That would be a waste.
Andrew Totten, Manchester, UK
Would be much better to get our lads out of there.
This is another Illegal American war..
Our Troops should defend only our interests.
Gormless and Blair in bushes pocket...
rick, newcastle, uK
Everone should stop being negative Nancies, whether you like the war or not this is a Good Thing, it's applaudable that this government wll buy hundreds of armoured trucks and tanks for our heroes in Afganistan, and not even out of the defense budget further easing the strain.
Lawrence, Salisbury, United Kingdom
Or how about that money could have been better spent at home? Not on a stupid war which was a bad idea from the start...
Joe, Reading, UK
Dont bother spending the money , pull out , save the lives of our boys and put the monye into the economy before it is too late
Andy, chalfont, england
About time too. The Govt should be ashamed that our troops have been inadequatly protected & our servicemen have died because they did not have armoured vehicles - or helicopters. Don't kid yourselves this is because Gordon 'cares' - all he cares abt is remaining PM & there is an election looming.
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
For 500 million Pounds we could provide so much employment in development that the Taliban would be closing down for lack of recruits.
Rafiq, Amman, Jordan
I can only hope that their reception is rather warmer than that given by my Bosnian interpreters to our aquisition of a Mercedes armoured 4x4 kindly lent by a Norwegian colleague during the war in former Yugoslavia. They refused to ride in it as it was "too hot, we can't open the windows".
david chown, bordeaux, france
So this means that we will now win the war? Bring schools to all the little girls? And help the farmers grow corn instead of poppies? And rid Kharzi of corruption in his family and the government? And make the UK a better, safer, more prosperous country? Or was I reading too much into this report?
J LEE, NY, USA
It is amazing how long it takes government to react to the loss of working class lives, and how quickly it reacts to the loss of upper class dollars.
But why stay on in Afghanistan?
9-11 2001 has been long avenged, thus expiring our NATO commitment.
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada
Shortage of Equipment has always been the same with any British Expeditionary Force, it was always assumed "A STIFF UPPER LIP" and a few fatalities were acceptable in the MoD.
Peter, Stoke on Trent, England. UK
About time. If the government can bail out bankers for hundreds of billions, they can spend half a billion on protecting our troops.
john, london,
well thank God your not PM then eddie. you'd probably manager to make gordon brown look positively liberal if you want british troops on british streets.
where the vikings not tested for survivability against IEDs before they were procurred? surely that would have been common sense
will, grimsby, uk
"rather than a useless war which does not concern us."
Maybe next time we decide to invade Las Malvinas, the US should keep its satellite intelligence to itself and let us at it alone as well.
DBR, essex, UK
Better not mention the FRES fiasco then! How many millions have been spent and no further forward. If FRES was available these vehicles would not be required at such additional cost. The credit crunch is small beer compared to MOD procurement!
Jim, Norwich, uk
A technology invented in desperation by abandoned British settlers (aka Rhodesians) in the 1960's, perfected by more abandoned settlers (South Africans) in the 70's, has been "discovered" by the MOD 45 years later. Labour shares responsibility for this appalling negligence with the MOD.
Gary, London,
What a surprise, a tracked vehicle vulnerable to landmines. A six-wheeled vehicle, as with the Saladin or the Saracen, is a far better option.
Derek, Taunton, UK
If i were PM, I would pull troops out of Iraq and afghanistan, whcih is cositng us Billions of pounds, and hundreds of British lives. We have financial problems at home,a nd our soldiers can be better employed in UK, fighting terror and crime, rather than a useless war which does not concern us.
eddie, london, UK