A test of "Britishness" which must in future be sat by all new applicants for British citizenship has already run into criticism for ignoring the nation's history.

Sample questions were issued by the Home Office this morning, as the Government prepares to launch the scheme tomorrow. But critics have balked at an exam which portrays a picture of life in Britain far removed from the weather-fixated, queue-loving ale drinkers of the national stereotype, focusing instead on a knowledge of criminal courts, union rights and benefits.

The questions include: "Do many children live in single parent families?", "Which of these courts uses a jury system?" and "Can your employer dismiss you for joining a trade union?"

From tomorrow, every foreign national applying for British citizenship must pass the 24-question, multiple choice "Life in the UK" exam. To pass the test, which costs £34 to enter, the candidate must score around 75 per cent to be eligible for naturalisation. Anyone who fails can resit the exam.

The aim is to engender the notion of Britishness among new citizens, who must already prove that they are able to speak basic English.

The Home Office today denied that there had been a surge in the number of applications in the run-up to the introduction of the test.

Tony McNulty, the Immigration Minister, defended the decision not to include British history among the list of subjects.

"This is not a test of someone’s ability to be British or a test of their Britishness," he said. "It is a test of their preparedness to become citizens, in keeping with the language requirement as well.

"It is about looking forward, rather than an assessment of their ability to understand history."

According to the sample questions released today, willingness to become a citizen is evidenced by a knowledge of the whereabouts of the Geordie, Scouse and Cockney accents. Constitutional questions are also touched upon, with future Britons required to understand the role of the Queen and describe the function of an MP.

Mr McNulty, a Londoner, said: "I looked at random through 20 questions and managed to get 19. I’m not telling you which one I didn’t get."

The Government plans to extend the test to refugees who have been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK. Successful applicants for asylum will also be required to sit the exam when they are awarded indefinite leave to remain.

Those whose English abilities fall below the basic level official English for Speakers of Other Languages entry three standard will take a less rigorous test.

The question of what it means to be British has puzzled politicians for decades. For Norman Tebbit there was the 'cricket test': immigrant communities, the Conservative grandee suggested, should always support England. John Major, the former Prime Minister, clung on to "long shadows on county grounds, warm beer and invincible green suburbs".

Before details of the test were announced, Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, said that he would be opposed to any test which candidates could fail.

"I don’t think we have to make this punitive or a kind of hurdle to becoming British," he said.

"Why would there be two classes of citizens - one who don’t have to know anything about our history because they happen to be born here, and the other who do have to know because they happen to have been born somewhere else?"

The Immigration Advisory Service, a charity that advises immigrants and asylum seekers, gave the tests a cautious welcome but said the questions needed "a light touch".

"The danger is that this will be seen as a way of excluding people from British citizenship," said chief executive Keith Best.

"The perversity of our education system is such that new immigrants who seek naturalisation may end up having more knowledge about life in the UK through these tests and their associated teaching than many who are born British citizens."

Last year more than 110,000 people were awarded British citizenship.

Explore UK News

• Crime News

• Education News

• Health News

• Scotland News

Times Recommends

• A vicar’s wife: ‘There is no one to fight for us’
• Every little helps at the supermarket
• Ugg or Fitflop? The battle of the boots