A TEENAGER born from an anonymous sperm donation has managed to track down his biological father using his saliva and the internet in a case that could throw the policy of donor anonymity into disarray.

Scientists have given warning that men who have given sperm are now at risk of being traced by offspring with the dramatic growth of genealogy and DNA databases on the internet.

They said that guarantees of anonymity, which have been given to thousands of donors over the years, could prove worthless with the increase in such resources.

The boy, who was 15 at the time, was able to evade safeguards by sending a swab of saliva taken from the inside of his cheek to a website used by genealogists to chart their family trees.

For a fee of $289 (£163), his DNA was mapped and added to the website’s database, which sends e-mail alerts to its customers when close matches appear. The service, www.familytreedna.com, compares the user’s Y chromosome — which passes from father to son virtually unchanged — against a database of Y chromosomes from other men.

Nine months later the teenager, an American who has not been named, was informed of two close matches. He was contacted by the two men, who were both using the website to trace their family trees.

Though the biological father had never supplied his DNA to the site, his Y chromosome profile, shared by his son and closely matched by the two other men, suggested they must be related. The similarities in Y chromosomes between the teenager and the two men revealed a 50 per cent chance that all three had the same father, grandfather or great-grandfather.

According to New Scientist, which is publishing the report this week, both men who contacted the teenager had the same surname, although with different spellings.

Using this information, he then used a second website, www.omnitrace.com, to compare the surname with the few details of his biological father given by the fertility clinic, which include date and place of birth, and his college degree. The search brought up a match for his father.

Similar details of British donors, as well as religion and occupation, are offered to their genetic offspring.

Bryan Sykes, a geneticist at the University of Oxford and chairman of www.OxfordAncestors.com, a genetic genealogy website, said that the case showed the power of the internet.

Professor Sykes, who first identified the association between the Y chromosome and surnames, said it could be used not only to trace biological relatives, but also help the police to identify a suspect’s surname from DNA from a crime scene.

Professor Sykes added that the case of the teenager tracing his father was particularly interesting because at no point had any unethical practice been undertaken, yet confidential information had been obtained.

A spokesman for the Hunam Fertilisation and Embryology Authority said that the law prevented licensed clinics from issuing information that might lead to the identification of donors registered between August 1 1991 and March 31 this year, but there was nothing to prohibit individuals from using other methods to identify these donors separately.

“It is important to remember that there is no legal or financial liability for any donors to the children conceived from their donation, provided the treatment was given in an HFEA licensed centre,” he added. Britain and a number of other countries now insist that sperm donors allow themselves to be identified once their children reach a certain age. In the US, most sperm donors are still anonymous.

WHO'S THE DADDY

Since April, sperm donors have lost the right to anonymity but the law does not apply retrospectively

Explore UK News

• Crime News

• Education News

• Health News

• Scotland News

Times Recommends

• Foxy Knoxy snared by her lust and her lies
• Britain is the land of the shrinking family
• Zac Goldsmith: Not such a green god