David Sanderson
Win VIP tickets
Thousands of motorists will belatedly receive speeding tickets after the High Court ruled yesterday that a 2cm black trim on a traffic sign was legal.
Motorists caught speeding on Tower Bridge had claimed that its four 20mph signs were prohibited under the 1984 Road Traffic Regulation Act because of their border. The High Court threw out their appeal against their convictions, ruling that it was based on a technicality and “utterly devoid of merit”.
The City of London, which collects money from speeding drivers on the bridge, said that 10,000 prosecutions had been put in abeyance because of the legal case and added that it would now be collecting the fines. Each of the drivers caught in the 20mph zone is also due to receive three penalty points.
The RAC Foundation had said that, had the appeal succeeded, several hundred drivers who had paid their fines would have been entitled to ask for their money back and for the points to be wiped off their licences.
Richard Sharpe, counsel for the six motorists, who brought the challenge with the backing of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, said that they all accepted that they had been driving faster than 20mph when caught on camera between June and August 2005. But, he said, there was effectively no enforceable speed restriction in place on the bridge because of the casing around the illuminated signs at the entrance to the 20mph zone. Mr Sharpe said that this casing, a thin black lip or border, was not prescribed by the regulations, which rendered the whole sign unlawful.
But Sir Igor Judge, President of the High Court’s Queen’s Bench Division, said that the overall visibility of the sign was not obstructed by the border and there was no question of a motorist being misled.
He said the trim was virtually invisible to drivers, meaning that there was no breach of the 1984 Act, adding: “This is somewhat of a relief as the appeal was based entirely on a technicality that was utterly devoid of merit and should be dismissed.”
His colleague Mr Justice Lloyd Jones said that even if the signs did not comply with the regulations, the complaint was misconceived and was “so minor that it may be disregarded”.
The motorists were ordered to pay £1,500 towards the prosecution’s costs.
Simon Walsh, a magistrate with the City of London, said after the ruling: “About 10,000 summonses are waiting to be processed. They were put on hold pending these test cases which have been rambling on for well over a year.” He said that motorists caught speeding on Tower Bridge could now expect to receive fines of between £100 and £150 on average, depending on their means, plus three penalty points on their driving licences.
Timothy Canadine, one of the motorists who had brought the appeal after being convicted of speeding at Marylebone Magistrates’ Court, said that he was disappointed with the ruling. Mr Canadine said that there was no need for the speed-limit on the bridge, adding: “It’s just another sign that they are demonising motorists and stealing money from us.”
Richard Massett, of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, said that there were no plans to appeal to the Lords.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
And just ewhen you thought is was all over! they got me travelling across this wonderful bridge at 27mph no visible signs having astma attack looking to stop quickly to admister inhalers unable to breathe getting panicky letter arrives your nicked send note back not admissable still nicked
steve langton, slough, uk
The Tower Bridge stealth tax trap is a pure con and nothing else.
No other average speed camera system in the country (a) has a limit this low or (b) this deliberate lack of adequate advance signing.
They abuse the heritage status to fail to paint the cams in yellow and instead deceitfully use Traffic Master camera blue. 20,000 tickets tells you not that there is mass disrespect for the law in the UK but that (a) no one knows the limits is there till they get a ticket and (b) 20mph is absurdly low for a road on which pedestrians are entirely segregated by barriers.
It is obvious the first few posts in this thread are the real public view but then along came the predictable possy of organised car hating eco warrior loonies from BRAKE. I hope these vindictive and spiteful people are eventually banned from all forms of mechanical transport and made to walk everywhere so they can practice the utter rubbish they preach
John Emery, Pimlico, London, United Kingdom
In relation to the above cases i was hauled in front of the london magistrates for "speeding" on tower bridge in june of this year nearly 2 years after the offence. I was caught on camera "speeding" at 29mph at 5:30am on a sunday morning. I aproached the bridge from a side turning which didn't have any signs instructing me that i was about to enter a 20mph zone. A very small sign was on the corner of the turning i was pulling out of which isn't visable if your looking down the road to avoid on coming traffic. As the bridge is street lite i presumed it was a 30mph road thus why i was travelling at 29mph. At the time i was a new driver with 3 points already on my licence so when i apeared in court the dates were back dated and although i had ben driving for nearly 3 years my licence was revoked. I also recived a £60 fine and £35 court costs. So far i have spent almost £700 trying to get back on the road and this is justice?
lee peacock, harlow, essex
The fact that they are permitted to give penalty points for an offence that they readily admit is only a heritage issue and not a safety one is shocking - it trivialises real safety concerns and puts the whole system into question.
As for the fines, the words stable door and horse spring to mind - the damage to Tower Bridge is already done if the speeding has occurred. It would make much more sense to trial road pricing on it.
amelia, London,
Nobody in their right mind could defend the way motorists are used as a cash cow by EVERYONE. The example of a mugger is a classic - theres every chance he will never get to court and then will get something lame like community service!
If you are a motorist you are presumed guilty evert time.
Look at average speed cameras in road works, still collecting cash when NO WORK is in progress!
Don, Birmingham, UK
I would advise those drivers who now receive a summons as a result of the delay that they have grounds for appeal against the summons, if the offence was committed over 12 months ago (arbitrary) ,under the Human Rights Act. They are not responsible for the delay as it was the decision of the authorities to delay their issue. More serious offences are thrown out on this issue.
John, Basingstoke, Hampshire
These fines are just another tax on motorists by the goverment, the sooner this labour goverment is out of power the better, more police patrols are the answer not these tax collecting machies!
Robbie, Belfast, N.I
If you are caught speeding then you have broken the law and must take the consequences.
Chris Carr, Dover,
I've no sympathy for speeding motorists - excessive speed can kill or maim anywhere but especially in built-up areas. Start your journey a little earlier and save your money by observing the speed limits!
If shoppers are caught shop-lifting then they can expect to be punished - why should motorists caught breaking the law be treated any different?
Diane Bush, Dorchester, UK
There is a 20mph speed limit on the road outside my house and despite complaints to the police about speeding motorists I am informed that you cannot enforce a 20mph limit------very strange
Alan Jones, Stockport, Cheshire
If the sign did not meet the The Traffic Regulations and General Directions 2002, which clearly states that "'Backing boards are not permitted to have a border"' then the sign is unauthorised and consequently illegal.
Bob Evans , Weston Turville, Bucks, UK
If you don't want to pay the fine don't do the crime how true,
but and it is a big but how many times have we heard that real criminals have got away with a serious crime because of a technicality !!! yet this judge just ignored the fact that there was a technicality however minor ,very strange don't you think ?
Still i suppose that motorists that break the speed limit are hardened criminals in this day and age.
David Merrick, Bournemouth, Dorset
If you don't want to pay the fine, don't do the crime. Let's hope this deters more criminals from commiting offences.
Jeff Wagstaff, Cardiff,
"Its just another sign that they are demonising motorists and stealing money from us.
Is this guy for real?
By speeding he chose to break the law, and is now paying a fine!
Does he support a view of It's just a sign that they are demonising muggers and stealing money from them" next time a mugger gets caught?
Cunobelin, Portsmouth, UK
pay up and shut up, speeding motoristskill. Don't speed, d you don't get fined. Am I being simplistic but is that not the answer? remember they are limists, not a challenge. You just obey the law, not difficult is it, do you shoplift? no so what's the difference? A crime is a crime is a crime.,
chris payne, hereford,