2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday

An Egyptian billionaire financier who feared for his life after being accused of being a Mossad spy was found dead outside his Mayfair flat yesterday in suspicious circumstances.
Ashraf Marwan, the son-in-law of the late President Gamel Abdel Nasser, was found beneath his fourth-floor flat in Carlton House Terrace.
Police were treating his death as suspicious. Friends of Mr Marwan, a former shareholder in Chelsea Football Club, said that he had feared assassination after being named three years ago as an agent during the Yom Kippur war.
Rumours of his death circulated in London’s Arab community last night. Some believe that he may have taken his life after a serious illness was diagnosed.
Mr Marwan’s death will send shockwaves across the Middle East and among some of Britain’s wealthiest people. His associates included Adnan Khashoggi, the arms dealer, Ken Bates, the football club chairman, the Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and the late Tiny Rowland.
If found to be murder, his death will carry echoes of last year’s assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, the former KGB agent.
Mr Marwan, 63, was identified as an agent by the Vanity Fairwriter Harold Bloom in his book Eve of Destruction, which detailed his involvement in the Yom Kippur war in 1973. Although Nasser, who humiliated the British Government at Suez, died in 1970, Mr Marwan, his son-in-law, was part of the inner circle of his successor, Anwar Sadat, who started the war.
The identity of the agent, described by a postwar Israeli inquiry commission only as “the source”, had been a closely guarded secret. Evidence pointed towards someone high in the Egyptian Establishment.
From published accounts based on Israeli sources, it was alleged that Mr Marwan was a “walk-in” who entered an Israeli embassy in Europe and offered his services in 1969. Extensive checks convinced Mossad that he was not a double agent.
In the ensuing years Mr Marwan provided information on Egypt and the Arab world that Moshe Dayan, the Israeli Defence Minister, and others would later term priceless.
Some believed that he was a double agent. Mr Marwan denied the claims, saying that he had never worked for the intelligence communities on any side. Mr Bloom acknowledged that he could be assassinated.
Mr Marwan was believed to have been born in Egypt into a wealthy family. He married Nasser’s daughter Muna in the 1960s and they had two sons and a number of grandchildren.
Rumours of how he made his money have circulated within the Arab community for many years. Many say that he was an arms dealer and had been introduced to plenty of contacts by Sadat.
Mr Marwan considered London his main home, according to friends, despite owning property across the world. Standing at 6ft 2in and very thin, he was seen at a social gathering in Central London last week with his wife.
Mr Marwan was a friend of Ken Bates, the former Chelsea chairman, and at one point held a 3 per cent share in Chelsea Village, one of the holding companies of the club. Later he was believed to be the subject of a Financial Services Authority inquiry into the sale of shares to Roman Abramovich, the current owner. He was also believed to have owned the Son Vida, one of the best hotels in Majorca.
Last night police kept a tight cordon around Carlton House Terrace, a white Grade I listed building overlooking St James’s Park that stretches between Buckingham Palace and Horse Guards Parade. Friends of the family said that Mr Marwan’s wife was flying back to Britain from Egypt.
A Scotland Yard spokesman said last night: “We were called at around 13.40 to Carlton House Terrace. The death is being treated as suspicious at this stage and the inquiries are under way.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Everything you need to know, own or do

Direct from the farms
Brisbane...
Both are acceptable in the English language. James' or James's. As English is not your first language, I could see how you might feel this looks funny. However, please pick up a grammar book and review the rules before posting to the world. Cheers!
Mike Oxlong, Olney, USA / MD
I once researched the issue of -s's or -s' after a debate with some friends.
For a word that ends in -s because it is plural, then to make it possessive you always use -s'. eg cows', without exception.
However for singular words ending in -s, the rule does not neccessarily apply.
It would appear that in fact there is no correct answer to this issue and indeed different well-established and respected grammars differ on the point.
The version I prefer, and the one most commonly used is that, if you pronounce an additional "s" to add a possessive inflection to a plural, then -s's is correct. If it is not pronounced, then -s' is correct. It would appear that it is simply a matter of preference.
In the circumstances, I think that St James's is correct. However, some grammars insist on only ever using -s', plural or not, which appears to be your own view.
If we were French, we would have an academy to issue a ruling on the point, but alas we do not.
Ed, Manchester, UK
And so begin the voices of ignorance. So a billionaire financier dies under suspicious circumstances..the plot sounds much like something out of a James Bond movie...yet simply because of his name and nationality, you had to bring ISLAM into this Topaz???? You put 2 and 2 together and came out with 56! Clearly, it is people like YOU encouraging unrest and hatred between groups and individuals!
sara, leicester,
Note to Mia, from Brisbane: you have struck on one of my pet peeves...and you are wrong. Using the apostrophe to denote possession in a proper noun ending in "s" should be followed by a second "s" if there is another sound to account for. An example: Bridget Jones's is correct, because of the sound made when pronouncing the word. An example of when an apostrophe would not be followed by a second "s" is Illinois'
I am glad that you take such an interest in proper spelling, grammar and punctuation. Keep up the great work!
Bill , San Diego, CA
A good read is The Eve of Destruction about the '73 war. Marwan must be the one referred there to as the"source." However, he is portrayed as a double agent, actually duping the Israelis as to first whether there would be a war, and then as to the exact time hostilities were to begin.
Bob, Los Angeles, CA
A couple of years ago 'Suad Hosni' or 'Soaad' not sure how to spell it exactly was thrown off a building in London. She was sick and depressed although in yer youth years she was the most beautiful actresses ever known to Egyptian cinema. Rumors circulated that she was in some way also related in some way to egyptian a very powerful and brutal intelligence persona one of the most brutal men that headed egyptian intelligence also around the time of 1973 war. or maybe just before during nassers time. some believe that she was writing her diary for publishing...
i dont know.
God have mercy on his soul and all good people from all religions who do the right thing and are not scared of any man.
Badran, Los Angeles, CA
Why is it that so many Americans feel the need to comment on this site? Don't they have newspapers of their own?
For the information of Mr Paddock, Blair was PM of the United Kingdom, not England. I find any favourable comparison between Blair and Churchill a ridiculous slur on our great WWII leader.
Blair will always be remembered for conning his people to go to war on behalf of the president of a foreign power.
As for the "War on Terror", where was the US when we had our own war on the terrorists of the IRA? Greeting Gerry Adams and helping him raise funds for the bombs and bullets to murder our troops. (Rudolph Giuliani now a leading candidate for US President pushing the "War on Terror" ticket as hard as he can.) Sickening!
Nick Saywell, Zagreb, Croatia
Please, save your country. You are on a course to multi-cultural mayhem. The Muslim mind does not perceive your acquiescence
as compassion, but rather as weakness, and they will respond accordingly.
David Maxwell, Covelo, California
Just a note.
The author of EVE OF DESTRUCTION is not Harold Bloom but Harold Blum.
yours,
Ted
Ted Feder, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Sorry Mia. You're right but by luck. From Strunk and White, "Elements of Style," Macmillian, NY, 1979, p. 1.
"1. Form the possessive singular of nouns by adding 's.
Follow this rule whatever the final consonant. Thus write,
Charles's friend
Burns's poems
the witch's malice
Exceptions are the possessives of ANCIENT proper names in -es and -is, the possessive Jesus', and such forms as for consciences' sake, for righteousness' sake.""
Now I will submit that Australian English grammar may be different than American english grammar.
Peter, Auburn, USA
James in NYC,
Its the US which is run by a man of dubious intelligence, and seems to be lost. If we had not followed Blair blindly into Iraq we would have saved the lives of hundreds of thousands.
akram, London,
Just want to comment on the latest error in your language, mia.
Copy editors, especially the Jameses and Joneses in their ranks, know full well that "princess" contains an internal "s" and thus regally avoids the need for a possessive apostrophe "s."
You are right on one thing, though: "Princessess's does look pretty stupid, especially with that superfluous "s" after the plural "-es" (that would be the fourth "s" in "Princessess's" for anyone counting).
By the way, mia, it seems like the words needed to flesh out your second phrase into a sentence are themselves MIA.
BubbaSqueal, Vancouver Island, Canada
Topaz Phil from little Wellington, Nevada ..... perhaps in your small town the only form of news you receive is from "Jerry Springer"; but if you had half a brain you would know that assassinations in the intelligence community usually are not driven by religious zealotry. Not to mention, that it is still unclear who this lad was spying for in the first place since some Israelis consider him an Egyptian spy. If a Brit betrays England and sells military secrets to China, and then Chinese economic secrets to America, and somehow ends up dead ... would you say that he was killed by Protestant or Buddhist zealots? Get out of Wellington, and mix with people from different backgrounds. And for God's sake turn off Fox News.
Saphira, Toronto, Canada
ummm.... islam may teach peace but the reason everyone assumes islam has a hand in violence is the fact that it is only people who believe in islam that blow themselves up for the glory of allah. islam is the only religion whereby the believers want to die and islam is the only faith where the only sure way to paradise is through death. c'mon folks not every muslim is a terrorist but most every terrorist is a muslim.
very sad to see people fall into this type of belief.
james stovall, manchester,
On behalf of us Americans who are not bloodthirsty and foaming at the mouth, I'd like to respectfully disagree with Mr. Paddock's comment.
When our nation was founded, the notion of representative democracy was paramount. The people's (those of voting age and wealth, etc .. but nonetheless) will was to be enacted and protected by the Congress and the President. Somehow, this view has been so distorted over the last 240 years as to now be read as: certain peoples' will should be carried out and if yer not with us, yer with the terrorists!
World: my apologies for Mr. Paddock.
David Owen, San Francisco, CA
Never Fear. Every square inch of London is watched by big brother. Cameras everywhere. I am sure Scotland Yard is moments from an arrest. Didn't do much to save one of the richest in the world though did they!
Trey Jurden, Canton, Georgia USA
uh, mia in Australia, you should know that St.James's is correct. It is archaic, to be sure. But that is the official designation of the Palace.
It is an historical anachronism that is maintained.
One would expect that an Australian would know her English history.
denis, McCall,
Mia,Brisbane, Australia......Yes agreed the spelling mistakes are getting worse each year I notice in both the FT and the Times newspapers, this maybe because the Government does not properly fund schools and thus we are turning out a generation or more of pupils many of whom cannot speak or write proper english.
Perhaps the Times and FT should employ people who CAN spell.This is not simply about this article but it is all over the place on occasion.
Sergei, London, UK
Why on earth are there loads of Americans on here bemoaning the fall of England? What on earth does this story have to do with that?
I am a bit concerned about this though.. seems like there's a lot of dodgy billionaires heading towards London, and other people's conflicts are being played out on our streets.
Owen, London, UK
I can bet you this is gonna be pushed under the carpet or blamed in some way on Israel or the USA
Alex., Brooklyn, US
Mia, I think from your comment it is very obvious that your first language is not English. "St James's Palace" is perfectly acceptable, particularly because it is pronounced with the double S sound, whilst something like "Jesus' disciples" is not always.
The plural "princesses" (you inexplicably added an S to the end) can only ever have an apostrophe following it, because (unlike St James) it is a plural noun. "Princesses's" will always be a nonsense by any English-speaker's standards. Please get it right before you get so scathing.
Seb C, Isle of Man,
Mossad dropped him like a dirty shirt.
Tom, Phoenix, AZ
Tony Blair heads toward history because he failed to not follow the (idiotic) lead of George W. Bush.
Benjamin Fader, Yonkers, NY
Mia, your complaint is not necessarily correct. See Strunk and White's "Elements of Style", which has for many decades maintained that the possessive of "Charles" is "Charles's".
Ãber Pedant, Borkborkborkshire, Uzbekistan
Actually, you're wrong, "mia". In standard English, either treatment is correct. Sorry if you don't like the look of the spelling as published, but it's perfectly acceptable (and historically, it's the preferred treatment.)
Carter Packard, Cambridge, Mass. USA
And i guess the Murder of the Russian Billionaire in the UK within the last 12 months was also carried out by Isamic Assasins ?
Please Grow up,
Anthony, London, UK
Trust an Aussie to teach everyone else English! In fact, you're wrong Mia. The rule on apostrophes is: if it's a one-syllable noun ending in "s", the possessive form is 's, e.g. St. James's Park. If it's a two or more syllable noun ending in "s" then only the ' is added, e.g Jesus' teachings.
Dylan Cross, Bad Neuenahr, Germany
Mia in Brisbane -- You have it backward, actually. While the modern tendency is to treat singular words ending in "s" the same as plurals (e.g. St. James' Palace instead of St. James's Palace), singular nouns should receive an apostrophe and an "s" when they are possessive. The four accepted exceptions are Biblical or classical names (Moses' or Xerxes'), corporate names formed from a plural word (General Motors'), personal pronouns (yours), and words preceding "sake" (appearance' sake).
Not sure how your comment related to the above story, though.
JK, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
To mia in Brisbane,
I know this debate has nothing to do with the article above, but you can actually use either form, as per the quote below from an english grammar website:
For names ending in -s:
In speaking we add the sound /ª z/ to the name, but in writing it is possible to use either 's or just '. The 's form is more common. e.g. Thomas's book, James's shop.
Jamie, London,
'Never fear, Islam is a religion of peace' what has that got to do with the price of fish Topaz Phil??!!?!?
Rufus, Cologne, Germany
In response to Mia, actually both St James' and St James's are acceptable, although St James' is more common. Noted that English is not your first language.
Alex Wilson, London,
"Why can't we all get along?"
Rodney King, Los Angeles , CA/ USA
Islam has little to do with this.
Traitors of any religion are often murdered by the people they betray.
You don't need religion to explain this one.
Suspicion obviouslyfalls on the Egyptians or some other avenger, but don't rule out Mossad either as he might know things about their operations that would embarass Israel.
Mark Strand, Washington DC, USA
Wait. Does this article propose that an Arab would actually talk to a son of pigs and dogs? Impossible. At the very least he would have been afraid that he would get some on him.
Steve Eisenberg, Pembroke, New Hampshire
What is the point of publishing incorrect rants about punctuation?
James's is correct.
Adele Winston, London, UK
Iam sorry i fail to see why you bring in islam into this.
pay attention to the world news lately its Americans the world dont trust.
so you heading should be NEVER.FEAR AMRICANS ARE HERE FOR DEMOCRACY.WE WILL INSTALL A PUPPET ON YOU TO GIVE YOU FREEDOM.
Imran, Hamilton, canada
The England of Nelson and Churchill is long gone. The Englandof Arthur Batchelor is here. God help you all.
Bill Maher, Beverly Hills, California, USA
To Topaz of USA
What on earth has this got to do with religion??
General point: why are there so many Americans making comments on here, we hardly see any "local" comments!
Joe, London,
Thanks to Phil and James for their incredibly insightful, meaningful and very useful comments. Let's wait until we hear how he actually died before we speculate, eh? Also, if he was a traitor to his country in what way does his murder reflect that of Alexander Litvinenko? Litvinenko was merely a strong critic of Putin who probably knew his dirty secrets. I trust no-one reading this is shocked to learn that foreign agents operate in the UK.
Also, assuming Marwan was a traitor then could someone please explain to me the necessary connection between his murder and Islamic fundamentalism? Surely elements of the Egyptian security services or even Mossad (to protect their secrets or to protect their real source who is still at large) would be more likely candidates.
Nigel Jaggers, Newcastle,
Eh? England is lost? Just because you can't find it on a map doesn't mean it's lost. What's your comment got to do with the article anyway?
Damian, Simor,
You die the way you live, it's the way ALL arms dealers should go.
K Bauslaugh, Caglary, Canada
Ashraf was a kind and intelligent man who loved his country may his soul rest in peace.
nena, woodbridge, usa
Spy or not, he seemed to have very strange bed fellows. He might have been murdered for any number of reasons, with such shady associates, he probably did very shady things and that is what got him killed.
Alexandra Macina, New York, NY
Topaz Phil comment proves that Islamaphobia is alive and well. This article, like the assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, the former KGB agent, has nothing to do with Islam but Islamaphobics like Topaz Phil will read into it with their skewed view of a quarter of the worlds population.
Adam Johnson, London, England
Re James Paddock, NYC, USA
England may well be lost, but the rest of Britain will flourish, as Scotland, Wales and Ireland once more assert their sovereign right to direct their own affairs at home and in the worls at large.
The UK has served its turn and we aare now moving on, looking to a larger Union where Scotland and the other Celtic nations will take an active part in the direction of the EU.
What England will do when all the Scots in the (British) armed forces leave (approx 24%) will be interesting to see.
Alas, it would appear That Mr. Paddock, not alone I'm afraid, confuses England with Britain. If he can't understand the relatively simple geo-political makeup of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland then he must be really confused with his own countries 46 states and 4 commonwealths.
David Glen, Glasgow, Scotland
Re: Topaz Phil - are you insinuating that this was done in the name of religion?! If so, then I sadly fear that further elections of bumbling morons posing as presidents is around the corner, because with a plentiful supply of people such as yourself, that is exactly what we will get. In case you have not noticed, this person is supposed to have betrayed his fellow Arabs, so what they did (if done at all) is toeing the line to "live by the sword, die by the sword".
One thing I cannot fathom is that if this is an English matter, then why do people from the other side of the Atlantic have such strong opinions? Would it not be worthwhile to abolish the current situation at Guantanamo and THEN pass judgement on others?
Rehan Ashraf, East Ham, London,
the above comments were brought to you by the people who believed the Reichstags fire was an external terrorist attack and that the united states foreign policy towards the middle east and asia over the last 60 years has nothing to do with the present trajectory of history.
Fear is the first step towards fascism. Do not be afraid.
Derby City Espresso, Louisville, KY, USA
Not just England my friend. The US is also lost, and we are doing it to ourselves.
Kim Workman, Sterling Heights, USA
England will awake from her pacifist dream to fight her enemies, or she will lose her identity as a nation and a people. It's that simple.
Ms. Campbell, Worthington, Ohio
Personal note to outgoing Prime Minister Tony Blair.
History may judge your time in office a disappointment, failure, tragedy, but I say thank you for having conviction and the courage to lead. We live in selfish world where there are msny who are slow to act if they act at all. Men make mistakes and errors in acting, the fear of making mistakes and being wrong.
Apathy, indecisiveness far more tragic.
It's what you do next that counts. Please continue to be strong and do many good deeds. Our world still needs heros in whatever form they come. Even politicians
Nick C, Seattle, Usa / wa
Mia,
Actually, it is correct English to include the 's, but dropping the last s is also correct and more socially acceptable.
Jeff, Columbia, Mo
S's is a debatable issue. Modern common usage indicates that s' is archaic if not obsolete. One of the first indicators that a person is not listening is when they criticize the speaker's delivery. Whether or not to use an archaic form of possesive punctuation misses the point. Islamofascists will halt at nothing to achieve their goals. A retired billionaire is considered fair game as an example, just as a beheaded dissenter. Any religion that believes that the 8th Century was the pinnacle of human civilization needs to be regurgitated. And this is from someone whose name ends in S.
Phil Seamans, Albuquerque, NM USA
Suspitious indeed.
Guy Emett, Corvallis, USA
Mia in Brisbane, Australia
I echo your punctuation corrections, and English (vis a vis American English) is my first language. Aside from the
punctuation, I enjoyed the article as this confirms some of
my notions about counter intelligence and espionage.
Cheryl D. Shaw, Las Vegas , NV United States
I am sure that the issues behind Mr Marwan's assassination (if thats what it was) are far more complex than the commentators below would have us believe. Can people please stop using this facility to post ignorant and irrelevant comments. What has Tony Blair's leadership got to do with this?
Rob K, Norwich,
Good Lord, it looks like London is becoming assasination central. What's up with that.?
Tom, Philadelphia, USA
Mia, just wanted to correct you - actually, for names (and particularly biblical names such as James), the correct possessive is James's.
James, Los Angeles, USA
Alas, Mia, that rule is outdated. You can use both James' and James's. Only classical names still follow this rule. So you can use Titus', but not Titus's.
The word "princessess" doesn't exist. It's "princesses" (and you'd use your discretion and just use an apostrophe, otherwise you'd sound like you were speaking parseltongue).
My first language isn't English, but I do have an MA in it ;)
starling, Lancaster,
i wish Topaz and his like stop dragging Islam in every incident that happens. Islam preaches peace, but if people want to follow violence it is not the fault of the religion. And why pick on Islam?? There are so many non Muslims who hav resorted to violence and killings but their faith has never been accused?? Topaz get a life, your Islam bashing is out of sync
waf, London,
Er... Earth to James Paddock, Earth to James, can you hear us?
This tradgedy has nothing to do with Islam or England, whatever else it's about.
Blogs attract their fair share of nutters don't they?
Bill, York,
The spelling was correct. It is correct to write "the Court of St. James's". This has often been disputed over the years and confirmed as correct as written. Perhaps someone else can explain why.
Charles Fenwick, Glyndon, MD, USA
>Just want to comment on the latest error in the English language
At least in American English, you're wrong here. When a noun ends with an "s" whether you add an 's or just an ' depends on whether the noun is plural.
For example:
Bill and Dan Brooks are the owners of that car.
That's the Brooks Brothers' car.
Brooks Brothers (the store) has good parking.
That's Brooks Brothers's parking garage.
Alex, Philadelphia, PA
To Topaz Phil
What has Islam got to do with this? If he was assassinated, it was not done for "Islam Security" but for Egypt's Security. I do not know if Topaz Phil reads a lot but if he did, I am sure he would have read about many assassinations, coups, murders, attempted murders and wars that were created by Christian MI6 or CIA agents.
Garba Maigoro, Kano,
Er... Earth to James Paddock, Earth to James, can you hear us?
This tradgedy has nothing to do with Islam or England, whatever else it's about.
Blogs attract their fair share of nutters don't they?
Bill, York,
To Mia:
Looks are deceiving and so is your comment. Although adding an apostrophe to a singular word ending in "s" looks better, it's simply a matter of house style. The Times' (I happen to not like adding an "s" in my house) style happens to be different than what you may usually read, but it doesn't make it wrong. This is one of those English rules that is not set in stone. Check out some other publications. Do some research before you proselytize, princess.
Johnny Reb, Erie, CO
St. James's is correct.
Charles Fenwick, Glyndon, MD, USA
In response to Mia's post, she is incorrect to say that you cannot use "James's". Both James' and James's may be used in this case. The both singular possessive uses would be correct. Also, "princessess" is actually spelled "princesses". She is in fact correct, her "princessess's" word does look pretty stupid, but only because of her actions. Further, the plural possessive does not contain an "s" on the end, so the correct spelling would be princesses'. Mia, please check your word use authorities before posting something such as this post. They may be found easily throughout the web.
Charles, Washington, DC
Mr. Paddock, that was brilliant. Great Britain and the U.S are sinking in quicksand, due to the onslaught of the religion of peace.
Mack, Morris, NJ
I am writing this from close to St. James's Church in London,England. The Underground Station is also "St. James's Underground".I wish Mia from Brisbane, Australia good wishes in her adventures in English.
A.Reader, London, England
mia:
In this case, St James's is the official spelling. But I do agree with you that many errors are made because of the terminating 's' plural possesive.
Robert Burch, Toronto, Canada
mia- Strunk & White say quite the opposite of what you say. They say NEVER say James' palace, and ALWAYS say James's. The reporter here followed proper English grammatical principles.
George, Houston, Texas, USA
Just want to comment on the latest error in the English language. When a word ends in 's' e.g. James' palace and not James's palace. The first culprit to introduce this error is Bridget Jones's diary. It is wrong and it will never look right so stamp it out before it becomes the norm. Just imagine if you are writing the word princessess' gowns, how many "s" do you want to put in ? Princessess's look pretty stupid. Get it right and this is from a person whose first language is not English.
mia, Brisbane, Australia
Never fear, Islam is a religion of peace.
Topaz Phil, Wellington, Nevada, USA
England is lost. Like Churchill before him, the voices of insanity and illusion, failed to follow the lead of Tony Blair. And so it heads toward history.
James Paddock, NYC, USA
Tony Blair is probably the best world leader Britain has had since Churchill, though Thatcher is a close tie with TB. Marwan was often in Saudi Arabia when i worked there in the American Embassy and we followed his whereabouts closely.
daveinboca, Boca Raton, FL USA
Crazy Mossad/CIA/Al Qaeda/MI6 people are always up to no good, blaming each other for the ills of the world. Just a bunch of drug-smuggling goons, the whole lot of them.
John Q. Pubic, San Francisco, USA
If he was indeed assasinated for his alleged undercover activities, Harold Bloom shoulders some of the responsibility for his death.
amy, WA, USA