Sean O’Neill
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Police are stopping 366 people every day in London under stringent anti-terror powers described by the official security legislation watchdog as “a significant intrusion into personal liberties”.
The number of random checks carried out in the capital increased fivefold to almost 11,000 last month in the aftermath of attempted car bomb attacks, when the threat level was raised to severe.
Scotland Yard said yesterday that it was encouraging beat officers to use their stop-and-search powers more often and more widely to deter further terrorist attacks. Commander Rod Jarman predicted “an increase in overt counter-terrorism activities by the police over the coming months”.
Street checks will take place across London, with particular focus on crowds at airports and mainline stations that have been targeted by terrorists in the past, and iconic landmarks that al-Qaeda has repeatedly identified for attack.
Checks will be carried out in a way that is highly visible to Londoners and visitors alike and could have an impact on the tourist trade.
Before last month the monthly average number of checks was 2,114 and in 2006-07 the annual total was 25,374.
Scotland Yard said that 54 per cent of those stopped last month were white, compared with a 71 per cent white population in Greater London. The proportion of people of Asian ethnicity stopped was 24 per cent – double the percentage in the capital’s population.
The surge in the use of the power, combined with the Prime Minister’s recent announcement of a border force and extensive electronic screening of travellers, is increasing civil liberties campaigners’ concerns. A spokesman for the Campaign against Criminalising Communities said: “More and more people are being harassed and threatened with prosecution under antiterrorism laws if they refuse to cooperate with being searched. It’s another step on the way to a police state.”
Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 authorises police to search any person or vehicle in a designated area without the need for reasonable grounds for suspicion. Greater London has been designated as an authorised area for several years and the power to stop and search is reviewed monthly by the Home Secretary.
After the terrorist incidents in London and Glasgow at the end of June, the power was extended nationally.
Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, raised doubts about the effectiveness of the power in his report on the 2000 Act in June.
He said that Section 44 was used too much, when it ought to be used sparingly. His report added: “I remain sure that Section 44 could be used less and expect it to be used less. There is little or no evidence that the use of Section 44 has the potential to prevent an act of terrorism as compared with other statutory powers of stop and search.”
But Scotland Yard has conducted its own review of the search power and concluded that it should be employed more widely and more often.
Counter-terrorism commanders believe that it is unlikely to lead to the capture of a terrorist, but will have a significant deterrent effect. Terrorists are known to conduct reconaissance and dummy runs, and with highly visible spot checks taking place they may be deterred.
A police source said: “If it disrupts their activities that will give our covert methods of tackling terrorism more time to detect and detain people.”
Separate figures on covert operations, also released by Scotland Yard, show that it spent £2.2 million last year on informants assisting investigations into organised crime, firearms use and terrorism.
Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “It is perhaps unsurprising that we have seen this massive increase in the number of stop-and-searches carried out in the immediate aftermath of the attempted car bomb attacks in June.
“However, questions remain regarding the actual effectiveness of such a strategy based on disruption – given the very low number of charges brought as a result – and whether it is actually doing more harm than good.”
Gareth Crossman, of Liberty, said: “Thousands of Terrorism Act stop-and-searches have produced hardly a single terrorism arrest. When not targeted against specific threats, Section 44 undermines community relations and wastes police resources.”
Bob Cotton, of the British Hospitality Association, said that high-visibility policing appeared to reassure overseas tourists but deter domestic visitors to the capital. The June car bomb incidents had “no impact at all” on visitor numbers, he said.
Few search arrests
22,700 stop-and-searches were carried out by officers from the Metropolitan Police in 2006
27 led to terrorism-related arrests
1,126 arrests under the Terrorism Act 2000 between 2001 and 2006
117 of those were charged with terrorism legislation offences
104 were charged with terrorism legislation offences and other criminal offences
Sources: Times database, Muslim Council of Britain
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In London yesterday Monday 22nd October. Walking by the London Eye with a camera. Stopped, but two police, and spent 15 minutes answering questions while one (a female PC) slowly filled a form in. Had both my clothing and my camera bag searched. Asked why I was chosen at random, told that I was a single person taking photographs in a sensitive area.
Me, 50, originally from the UK, now US citizen. WC PC, unpleasant, and in no hurry to move things along. She was upset that I didn't want to 'make conversation', which in fact was merely a pretence to ask me a lot of intrusive questions about how long I had been in the country, where I'd been, where I lived, and what I was doing. This was not a pleasant experience. I was told that the information would be stored on a database but retained in the UK.
Note to the UK. If you want people to come and be a tourist in your country, expect them to want to take photographs of it.
Paul M., New York, US
It's time to stop all this paranoia about terrorism. Of course Scotland Yard likes this, they like anything which resembles a police state.
We need to fight to keep Britain a free and democratic country against all the scaremongers.
Mark, Northampton,
Since Gordon Brown has forbidden the words 'Muslim' and 'terrorist' to be used by his ministers in the same sentence, it is a wonder that anyone beyond 90 year old white great grandmothers are stopped and searched. Since racial profiling is currently untrendy, we can be sure Britain will rarely stop and search any young middle eastern men wearing knapsacks and muttering about the glories of allah. Good luck, Britain, too bad you value PC above safety and
reason, we may as well add - liberty, too. In a society seriously safeguarding its citizens, those who promise they will destroy the West, will oppressive its women and steal its wealth in the name of Islam and who perform every single suicide bombing in Britain and worldwide, should be profiled and searched and arrested whenever there is any cause at all. This will not happen outside the US because Europe is supine, shouting about peace and waiting for America to come and save it, from every terror.
Paddy O'Brian, Birmingham, England
I remain unconvinced that Sect. 44 is particularly useful relative to other existing powers. I am not alone in finding the prospect of being stopped and searched "without the need for suspicion" to be entirely contradictory to values which terrorism actually seeks to undermine. They amount to no more than random searches on members of the public - producing as they do, very little, but undermining the confidence and respect for the Police that the Force depends upon for its successful operation.
There is no doubt that measures with as much "breathing-space" as recent legislative changes have brought about DO lead to abuse. Moreover, it does not take much imagination as to what the greater element of "racial makeup" of the searched people will be; further alienating such people from society.
It is worrying that the Police are being expected to act in a way that will undoubtedly set them off from the very people they need to "be close with"; the general public. And irresponsible.
John, Carlisle,
We made the mistake in the early 1980s of kow-towing to the ethnic & religious minorities under the pretence of good community relations & repealed the stop & search law - this played into the criminals hands & they took full advantage of law & order's soft policies - just look how weapons are carried as a matter of course now by many of our violent criminals. Stop & question, stop & search. The police need these powers. It's ridiculous not allowing the police to ask someone questions & not being able to do anything if they get no answer or are told lies. Presently police have to have a suspicion or reason in order to stop & search someone (except under Sect 44 Terrorism Act 2000). If they were released from their manacles the public would be better protected & the offender less likely to try their luck. These laws are needed to get us back to the days whereby the risk of getting caught outweighed any advantage the criminal thought they had. Recent figures show 54% searched were white
Lynda Plum, London, england
"Sure, I dont like the idea of police having powers to search me whenever they want but if it wasn't for terrorists killing innocent people in the name of their religion then I wouldn't have to worry."
You don't have to worry anywyay, or very little, if you don't look ethnic/Muslim.
And I have no sympathy with a community more interested in complaining about others - and doing it constantly - while constantly denying and ignoring the problem in their own midst for which THEY are responsible, part of which is providing an ideological envoronment in which terrorism breeds just as the Irish community used to do that with the IRA.
Joe, Manchester,
Good.
Good to see them doing more.
My only concern is, that the powers might be used indiscriminately when in fact discrimination is needed. These terrorists are Muslim. And while no one suggests Muslim identifiers are 100% precise - ethnic appearance and clothing - they are perhaps 80-90% precise and that's why discrimination is needed for the sake of efficiency.
Joe, Manchester,
Typical of this Government to abuse anti-terror legislation. It was no different with the NatWest 3.
There has never been more reason for boundaries to be re-drawn, it is obscene that we in the south of the country, the powerhouse of the economy, have to endure a Governement kept in power by the other parts of the country.
Martin, Reading, UK
How many of those were added to the DNA database?
Matthew , Tokyo, Japan
Groups like the Muslim Council of Britain want to spend less time moaning about the laws of this land and more time addressing those extremists that are giving Islam such a bad name. Sure, I dont like the idea of police having powers to search me whenever they want but if it wasn't for terrorists killing innocent people in the name of their religion then I wouldn't have to worry.
Rod Munch, Northampton, UK
How much more do civil liberties campaigners "concerns" have to be increased by before someone says "enough"! Every time we read one of these stories their concerns are "increasing". It`s about time they realised that those in authority have got nothing but contemptuous dismissal of any of their "concerns" or perhaps you could show some occasions when they have actually had an effect. And show me a Police authority that doesn`t want more power - all for your own good of course. Where`s the protection against a capricious policeman who feels like stopping you for the hell of it? You mean there isn`t any! It`s CCTV,Judge Dredd policing and ever increasing Civil penalties and Bailiff powers for an increasingly narrow band of "acceptable" behaviour. Do you think that any of these people are ever going to give up any of their "powers". How about a campaign to help people leave the country? I don`t know many people that wouldn`t jump at the chance.
Jim, Herts,