2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now

The grandmother of Ellie Lawrenson, the five-year-old girl killed by a pitbull terrier, was acquitted of her manslaughter yesterday but left court with what the judge called a “life sentence of regret”.
The jury at Liverpool Crown Court found that Jacqueline Simpson’s decision to allow the dog into the house did not constitute the gross negligence necessary to prove the charge.
Last night Ellie’s father blamed Mrs Simpson for his daughter’s “barbaric and horrible death”. Darren Lawrenson, 31, told ITN: “She is a grandmother. She is supposed to look out for Ellie and protect her. She knew everything about that dog and that it was never to come into the house.
“I know people can say they have sympathy but if she was your child, and her grandmother knew what the dog was capable of, then, I am afraid, there can be no sympathy for her. I know, and she knows, she ended Ellie’s life.”
Mrs Simpson, who had drunk almost two bottles of wine and smoked nine to ten cannabis joints on the night of the tragedy, was told by the trial judge, Mr Justice Royce, that she had only a “life sentence of regret” to look forward to.
What the jury did not know was that she is a convicted heroin dealer and that police found a small quantity of the Class A drug stashed in the semidetached house in St Helens, Merseyside, after the child’s death.
Forensic science officers also discovered bundles of cash, amounting to £15,000, hidden throughout the property. The cash was seized as the proceeds of crime and its eventual destination is a still a matter of dispute.
Kiel Simpson, 24, a convicted drug dealer who owned the dog, was a notable absentee throughout his mother’s trial.
The prosecution could offer no evidence that the powerfully built family pet, called Reuben, had been used in its owner’s drug-dealing activities but such “fighting dogs” are routinely associated with a criminal lifestyle.
During the trial the jury was told that five-year-old Ellie stood no chance against the jaws of such an animal, which was twice her weight.
She had been staying at her grandmother’s house on New Year’s Eve and had pleaded with her parents, Mr Lawrenson and Lindsey Simpson, 25, to stay there when they called to take her home to Great Sankey, Warrington, at about 3.30am.
Instead of going straight to bed, Mrs Simpson, by then almost twice the legal drink-drive limit, allowed the child to stay up playing with her Christmas toys. At about 4am she took pity on the dog whimpering with fright at the fireworks bursting around its kennel and allowed it into the house with the child.
The prosecution alleged that she broke a hard-and-fast family rule not to allow such an unpredictable animal into the house when either Ellie or her four-month-old brother, Joshua, were inside.
There had been concern after the dog had attacked a neighbour and his Jack Russell and, six weeks before El
“ lie’s death, it had sunk its teeth into the thigh of Kelsey Simpson, 20, the child’s aunt.
The pathologist had counted 72 separate injuries on the child’s body, mainly to her face, neck and throat.
Mrs Simpson, a broken figure in plain black jacket and trousers, wiped away a tear as the jury said she was not guilty of manslaughter, which attracts a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.
Mr Justice Royce, the judge, told the court: “This is an unusual case which had given rise to very strong emotions. Suffice to say, the greatest sentence passed in this case is a life sentence of regret this lady has passed on herself.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Everything you need to know, own or do

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I find it amazing that only the grandmother was charged. Ellie's uncle, Aunt and mother all knew the dog was dangerous and that it has attacked at least 2 people, yet it is the grandmother who gets charged (never mind that she apparently thinks it's ok to be stoned and drunk whilst babysitting!), the uncle gets 8 weeks for owning an illegal dog - what about the fact that he and the rest of the family had felt in necessary to introduce a 'no dog in the house' rule. My heart goes out to Ellie the only innocent in this entire case. The whole family should feel a life time of guilt and regret for not acting on the situation when the dog first showed signs of aggression.
Ami, blandford,
It is of course a total nonsense that the jury were deprived of information vital to assessing the character of the accused. In its absence, they were capable of being misled into looking on her as a "grieving grandmother" deserving of sympathy. It is absolutely wrong that the prosecution should be force to make its case with one and a half hands tied behind its back! Another depressing symptom of just how foolish modern Britain has become as a result of the bleeding hearts of the woolly minded liberal and politically correct brigades.
Bill McCann, Suzhou, China
Although this was an horrific thing to happen to that poor family, not least Ellie, has anyone stopped to think about the effect fireworks have on dogs? I understand that the dog was vicious, but I suspect that any dog left outside on New Years Eve would have been petrified, and would therefore act out of character. Some of the fireworks are like bombs going off and unfortuneately, fireworks are used on a daily basis now for all sorts of celebrations, some often into the early hours of the morning. Is ithis really necessary when it causes such distress to animals? In view of this terrible tragedy, should we not now be looking at other ways to mark our celebrations?
Liz, Warrington, England
Seeing what kind of person the grandmother is and what kind of people the parents are, it makes one wonder what life had in store for Ellie Lawreson.
It seems to me that, from the day she was born, this poor little girl had no chance whatsoever in life - whether mauled to death by a savage dog at the age of five or following her family into a life of drugs, unemployment and early pregnancies a mere 10 years later.
Gordon G, London,
mrs simpson is already serving a life sentence. what i want to now is why isnt the owner of the dog not on trail. i live in st.helins and now of this family. kiel was the owner of this dog .surely this means he is responsible for the dogs actions and he has got of light he had the dog as a status to his drug dealing. ellie was a child and the whole family put her a risk by not getting rid of the dog. the grandmother took all the blame for this and he was seening laughing and jokeing the day after her death. this of a very careing uncle its a joke.
liz, st.helins, england
You see people with these dogs and you think that dog looks dangerous. But kind of get the impreesion - from the owner - that their dog is good and the problem is yours.
Some of these dogs look far more vicious then anything we used to call a 'dog' when we were young.
I truly feel sorry for what looked like a beautiful and happy little girl.
Sonia, London,
You don't have to be a hunging judge to pass a life sentence on this lady that habitually intoxicates herself and thus deprives herself of judgement and sentment. Her criminal gross negligence may glaim more victims if she is let loose.
Nikos Vlassopoulos, Khania, Greece
What a shocking decision by the jury. Had I been a member of the jury, and not known about Mrs Simpson being a convicted heroin dealer, just as they didn't know, I am convinced that by smoking drugs and drinking as she did that day I would have felt she was guilty of gross negligence.
Surely any stupid act following such smoking and drinking should automatically seal anyone's fate in cases like this.
What a world we live in today!
Martin, Colchester,