Richard Ford, Home Correspondent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Eight images out of ten supplied to the police from closed-circuit television do not help to identify criminals, according to a Home Office report published yesterday.
The report also says that the majority of cameras are not placed where they can help to detect or prevent serious crimes or terrorist attacks.
Some cameras are now being positioned to catch motorists in bus lanes and record vehicle numberplates. And many cameras in public places such as shopping centres and pubs and clubs are designed to “monitor crowds, slips, trips and falls” rather than criminal behaviour.
The report said that the use of CCTV cameras to generate income by monitoring traffic could lead to their being used less for crime prevention and catching criminals.
The National CCTV Strategy report outlined failings in the use of CCTV but recommended a huge extension in surveillance by allowing police almost automatic access to cameras run by councils, shopping centres and even small retail premises.
The report by the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers said: “Anecdotal evidence suggests that over 80 per cent of the CCTV footage supplied to the police is far from ideal, especially if it is being used for primary identification or [where] identities are unknown and identification is being sought.”
It added: “In some cases the cameras’ initial purpose has been changed or they are required to perform a number of additional and conflicting tasks.”
Although the report highlighted the crucial role of CCTV in investigating terrorist incidents, it said: “The majority of cameras have not been placed in positions which may be required for the prevention and detection of serious and organised crime and counter-terrorism.” The authorities should consider placing cameras to cover high-risk targets such as key economic sites, the report added.
A study in 2002 suggested that there were 4.2 million CCTV cameras in Britain but the report said that there was uncertainty about where cameras were, if they were covering correct areas and whether the images they produced were “fit for purpose”.
The report said that the huge proliferation of CCTV cameras was presenting the police with serious problems – in particular their capacity to recover evidence and review tapes.
Many police forces had failed to develop the capacity to retrieve digitally recorded CCTV footage, resulting in evidence being lost, the report said. And since the introduction of digitally recorded CCTV, the owners of some systems were storing the recording for only 14 days rather than 28 to 31 days.
The study also called for a new body to be set up to oversee CCTV schemes and ensure there was a balance between cameras deployed for crime-fighting and other uses. There should be a review of the location and purpose of all CCTV cameras, it said.
A Home Office spokesman said: “The strategy recognises that for CCTV to continue to be effective it must have both the support of the public and take account of rapidly changing technology.”
David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, said: “The countless victims of crime in this country will be stunned to hear that not only can they not get a police officer on the streets but also most of the CCTV footage that should help them get justice is useless.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
CCTV is just another way of monitoring our everyday lives. Its all just a spying game, an invasion of privacy! CCTV images are rarely good enough to prove anything anyway! In my town they have installed mics on the cameras so they can listen to us! Oh and they can read the time on a watch from 200 meters away!
sam walters, rugby, warwickshire
You have query we're some of these camaras are;
We've got four in the local parks , ( very expensive versions
with the telescopic lenses ). It makes a walk around the park
been followed around by these swiverling, wirling freakioes very unpleasant.
Still, the councils ot a budget problem for next year.
Wish this country would get back to some common sense.
Too much meaninless intellectualism, if you ak me.
M walker, Bromsgrove, worcs
CCTV footage of criminal acts can and does save police and court time - before the introduction of CCTV many criminals although 'caught bang to rights' pleaded not guilty accusing police and other witnesses of distorting the facts. The problem today is a most simple criminal act caught on CCTV still requires considerable form filling!
Ken Rogers, Wivenhoe, U.K.
A public house CCTV has good pictures of pick pockets stealing but the police are not rushing to view the tape.
Graeme
Hornchurch
Graeme Stenson, Hornchurch, Essex
Just about every Junior Police officer in the country has known this for years. Most private schemes are based on old cheap cameras using worn out video tapes. The Council run schemes have mostly be subverted to prosecute Parking offenders.
CCTV has a place in crime detection, well behind effective perimeter control, door control and direct Identification methods.
It is NOT a panacea solution as portrayed by many unthinking Politicians of ALL parties.
Barry PURKIS, Havant, England
Britain is turning into Big Brother.
We should remove the majority o CCTV cameras and place them only where they actualy help the police catch and / or identify criminals!
Alex Jones, Windsor,
Whilst i agree with Paul M from Hull's comments, i must say that he needs to take a trip down to London where the reverse is the case. CCTV Cameras only operate at their peak efficiency b\w the hours of 7am - 7pm which is when they are used for revenue generation, monitoring bus lane's, parking infringements, stopping in box junctions et al. Outside those hours they are turned off and completely useless. I agree whole-heartedly with the report, they are used improperly and are frankly mostly useless in the fight against crime. When i say "they" i am referring to the cameras operated by most London councils and TfL.
Andrew Ezea, Hackney, LONDON
I'm a serving PC in a north of England force and work as an Interviewer in a city centre station. I deal primarily with low-level crime and "nuisance" so Public Order offences, shop-theft and the like are my bread and butter. Our town centre is well covered by the Council's CCTV system to which we have ready access within hours of any incident and in my experience it is an invaluable tool in many of our investigations. In dealing with a street fight involving ten or fifteen persons , verbal accounts and written statements can only take you so far in deciding who the suspects are. The availability of good quality CCTV footage simplifies this and can often make all the difference. The same goes for shop-theft where I can show the suspects the footage of themselves committing the crime and expect the almost inevitable "full and frank confession". It's not perfect or useful in every instance but it really is a great help in the detection and prosecution of offenders.
paul M, Hull, UK
More control-freakery. Don't worry if it doesn't work, just install it.
Terry Dell, Weybridge, UK
Who would have thought!
Farrukh, Woking, UK
You don't say!
nonplussed, london,
Are you paying attention Winston ?
Pete Balchin, Solicitor , Bristol, UK
I'm sure most of the tax paying population will be thrilled to hear that the money they give is used in such a manner. You have unfortunately come to expect this from some arms of councils, but for the police to waste the money spent (and it is a waste dear officer) and not enhance our security, seriously questions the morals of such action.
Andy B, London, UK
Cameras don't prevent crime - if they did Britain would be virtually crime free, and now their only real use in trying to identify criminals after the event is shown to be useless 80% of the time.
Rather than inanimate CCTV cameras how about the really novel idea of having a few policemen patrolling our streets and shopping centres.
John, aylesbury, bucks
Four million cameras but all in the wrong places? Seems hard to believe. Not being used to monitor crime? Well, those doing the monitoring don't know when or where a crime is going to be committed, but if they see one in progress they'll monitor it, surely. Uncertainty about where the cameras are? Surely it's obvious the police should have access to all necessary data. OK, the system may need improvement, but Mr Davis's sweeping statement hardly seems justified. And I trust no-one is saying that discouraging cars from using bus lanes is wrong.
Barry, Wallington, UK
So what else is new?
Andrew Milner, Karuizawa, Nagano