Jack Grimston
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
TEENAGERS who refuse to work, attend training or go to school are to be issued with on the spot fines under government proposals. Any who still fail to comply would then be taken to court where they could face further penalties.
The measures are designed to enforce a new law which will be outlined in this week’s Queen’s speech. It will say that all teenagers must remain in education, training or employment until they are 18.
The change will be phased in by raising the age to 17 in 2013 and to 18 in 2015. Details of the new “age of participation” will be outlined by Ed Balls, the children’s secretary, in a television interview today and in a speech tomorrow.
The new law will effectively outlaw “Neets”, teenagers and young people who are “not in education, employment or training”. In a speech to the Fabian Society tomorrow, Balls will put the proportion of Neets at about 10% of 16 to 18-year-olds.
On today’s Sunday Programme on GMTV, he will argue that the change is “the biggest educational reform in the last 50 years”.
Balls will admit that Britain performs poorly in terms of the numbers of teenagers who drop out of the system at the age of 16. In international league tables, he will say, Britain is “pretty much at the bottom, despite the rise in participation we’ve seen . . . the vast majority of countries have more people staying on [after 16] than we do”.
The first group to be affected will be today’s 10 and 11-year-olds and the change is likely to provoke strong arguments. When Brown first put it forward in July, a senior union figure, Geraldine Everett, chairman of the Professional Association of Teachers, said that the move was a “potential mine-field” that would “compel the disaffected to, in their perception, prolong the agony”.
Frank Field, the Labour MP and former minister, wrote in last week’s Sunday Times that a group of teenagers in his Birkenhead constituency “rolled around laughing at the idea that any government could try to lock them up in school until they became 18”.
To provide places for the teenagers, Balls will announce the creation of an extra 90,000 apprenticeships by 2013 for 16 to 18-year-olds to add to the current 150,000. There will also be 44,000 new places at further education colleges.
Tomorrow he will also issue a pamphlet detailing how the changes will be put into practice: “These new rights must be matched by new responsibilities . . . young people are responsible for their participation and this can be enforced if necessary.”
If someone drops out of education or training, their local authority will try to find them a place.
According to Balls’s department, if they refuse to attend, they will be given a formal warning, in which the “local authority will clearly explain their duty to participate and the consequences of not doing so”.
The next step will be to issue a formal notice, followed by a fixed penalty ticket. The Neet could then be taken to a youth court and fined, but the sanction will not go as far as imposing a custodial sentence.
Balls’s proposal to give children the opportunity either to train or stay at school reflects the policy of both him and Brown to blur the distinction between vocational and academic education in the hope that the skills of the whole workforce can be improved.
Last month, the schools secretary announced that the government’s new diplomas, to be introduced in 2011, would include not just practical subjects such as travel and tourism but also academic topics.
Critics have accused Labour of diluting the rigour of A-levels and GCSEs to ensure more young people gain qualifications.
But Balls will say today: “For decades we’ve been bedevilled by a two-tier view, which was that getting a skill, going to university, was for the few, and that for most young people excellence wasn’t for them, that they would end up with a second-class route into either vocational learning or an unskilled job.” Balls says today. “We’ve got to put that view behind us.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Everything you need to know, own or do

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
"If Neets faced being drafted into the armed forces, the problem would resolve itself very quickly. "
What we need is somebody to draft the Prime Minister into objective reality.
Tazia Hollinger, Belfast, Ireland
Don't worry, once all the 16-18 year olds who refuse to make the right choice are criminalised, there'll be a whole new generation of slave labour to 'use'. Plus, as a bonus, all these new criminals will have their DNA on file ready for the new ID cards!! Now the govt will just have to work out how to get the unemployed and working poor to pay hundreds of pounds for the privelage.
It should be interesting watching the news over the next couple of years.......... there'll be a drip feed of horror stories over home educated children so they'll be kept tabs on aswell. After all, how will they be institutionalised when their parents are giving them the skills to think for themselves??
K Manners, brighton, england
Do not agree with compulsory education/training beyond age 16, and certainly not herdng our young adults into 'camps' - Attendance at school or other designated building is not compulsory for any age, 'education is',
but neither do I agree that benefits should be handed over to those unwilling to pursue providing for their own living either.
This is yet another scam to make statistics appear better - crminalising our young people is not the answer to lacklustre and so far failing education 'improvements'.
karen, Crawley, UK
I completely agree with the first post by Alex. The educationial system is a complete & utter sham!
Sara, Yorkshire,
Are they also planning to raise the age of consent and marriage or are they going to provide free child care to all the mums who are 16 and 17?
Diana Kimpton, Cowes, Isle of Wight
Does this not tell you that you are nothing but a human resource, a slave, a serf in an old feudal sysyem to work and act for the elite?
Dennis, USA....bad here too with the socialist communist democrats and neocon republicans, both the same ...tyrants!
Dennis, Gainesville, USA...Missouri
Here we go again! Another fascist reform to mislead the public about the real issues. Schooling is not education. Indoctrination woul be a more appropriate term. Nobody want to spend their lives being bored to death by a bunch of repeaters that have being brainwashed in order to brainwash others.
Alex, London,
goverment ministers really don't have any idea. In Norfolk there are so few education, training or employment oppotunities for 16 and 17 year olds that actually fit with the abilities of the 16 and 17 year olds. Many are from the lower income bracket families that are not academic. Manufacturing industry is disappearing which is where these young people would have been employed in the past. further more to impose a fine on a person that does not have an income will result in none payment and court appearances. this will result in a criminal record and further alienating young people. The world is already aganist them.
Deni, Norfolk,
Hmm... let's see... we could go out and listen to teenagers, teachers and employers. We could work with them on continually and incrementally improving the situation, step-by-step, with the aim that every year a few more young people *want* or at least see the value in staying in school or training.
Nah... that sounds like really hard work let's just knock out some shabby legislation making it illegal. That'll instantly make Britain *look* better in the international league tables.
Sure, the result will be that teachers and employers will have to baby-sit a bunch of disruptive and disengaged teenagers that are being forced to turn up against their will. But that's not our problem the important thing is the numbers look better!
Etienne , cambridge, cambs
Labour camps are a good idea, Jennifer Hynes. I favour national service as they have in other EU countries. I know many people who have completely wasted their lives and could not have done so without benefits. A year or two of national service early on would have sorted at least some of them out.
Eugene, Chester, England
Actually, according to BBC news, the proposal to increase the 'school leaving age' only applies to England, and not to the other countries of Britain. For the education attainments of their young people, does not require the adoption of this proposal by their respective Governments.
Gerallt Huws, Talsarnau, Cymru
I am aghast. I have never heard such a stupid and obviously ill-thought out policy since the last Labour policy came to light. Perhaps the government is considering Labour camps next, or what about chain gangs?
Jennifer Hynes, Plymouth, England
what a barmpot of an idea, how are these kids going to pay the fine if they are not working, looks like parents are going to get hammered once again. This government must stay awake all night thinking up these crazy ideas. Youths today don't give a toss about authority, and with good cause when you veiw the antics of our politicians, I wouldn't like to tackle 17 @ 18 year olds, this policy will create havock and riots. Mind you this is probably a trap for the Tories to carry out, because Labour won't be in power.
waine UK, mersyside, UK
"If Neets faced being drafted into the armed forces, the problem would resolve itself very quickly."
Comments like the above are part of the problem and no part of any soution.
Britain has lost the plot and is no longer Great - and it certainly won't be made Great by fascist dictatorship.
K. Harris - English, Limerick, Ireland
If teenagers are not working, how will they pay the fines? No doubt from their State benefits.
carole chapman, corridonia, i
Will this only apply to indigenous teenagers or immigrant teenagers as well?
Anil Chatterjee , Bury, Lancashire,
So 17 & 18 year olds are to be schoolchildren again, it will be a spectacular trick if they can pull it off. They can't even get our 14 and 15 year olds to go to school. It will turn into a benefits for work scam similar to the US precedent.
Tazia Hollinger, Belfast, Ireland
If the gvt offered a college/university education to everyone, then there would be no button pushers, machine operators and unskilled workers to keep the machine ticking over
Damon N, scarborough,
I often wonder if our politicians are actually living in the real world, that's the one the rest of us occupy. NuLabour's propensity for issuing fines in order to combat any dissent that may be met by their hair-brained schemes has now reached a new level with Mr Balls idea to fine 16-18 year olds if they don't comply with his indentured training! Whom does Mr Balls think is going to pay these fines? The majority of youngsters who do not continue with further education are from poorer social backgroungs were the family is likely to be on minimum wages or benefits, and fines will only make matters worse not better for them. Our education system is failing because nobody wants to admit that you cannot teach those who do not wish to learn, whilst 'Every Child Matters', not all are suited to an academic education. Returning in part to the old grammar system will give back the aspirations this brought to people, together with improved secondary and vocational training schools.
Les, Southport, England.
I'm just appalled that sane, supposedly educated people(goverment ministers) actually believe this is a solution to school drop out's. What are you thinking?
Anyone with a teenager knows you can't force them to do anything. But if you make it interesting enough to keep them engaged, they are your's forever.
I just can't believe that I'm living in the UK, more and more I see the goverment practicing Stalinism. What's next, camp's in the Heberdies for non-complient teens or maybe senior citizens?
The Labour goverment's duel line of thought seems to be allow rampant capitalism to degrade everything worthwhile in the UK, filling the coffer's of the far-left socialists and at the same time saddle the common citizens with so much nanny stateism that they are too overwhelmed to protest.
Joshua, Buckeye/London, USA/UK
If Neets faced being drafted into the armed forces, the problem would resolve itself very quickly.
Geoff Edwards, Vancouver, Canada