Sean O'Neill, Crime Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
A man was charged yesterday with the murder of Rachel Nickell who was stabbed in a frenzied attack on Wimbledon Common 15 years ago.
Robert Napper, 41, a warehouseman, is expected to appear in court by videolink next week. But Mr Napper, who is being held in a mental health hospital, might never stand trial if he is judged to be too unwell to understand the legal process.
Miss Nickell, 23, a part-time model, was walking on the common in southwest London with her two-year-old son when she was attacked in July 1992. She was sexually assaulted and stabbed 49 times. Her son was standing by her body, crying “Wake up, Mummy” when she was found.
The boy, now aged 17, lives in France with his father, Andre Hanscombe, who was Miss Nickell’s fiancé.
The decision to charge Mr Napper is final vindication for Colin Stagg, who was the focus of a lengthy police investigation and spent a year in custody before a trial at the Old Bailey in 1994. He was acquitted when a judge threw out the case and criticised the police for running a “honey trap” operation. A female undercover officer had befriended Mr Stagg and encouraged him to talk about the killing and discuss violent sexual fantasies.
Mr Justice Ognall said the use of the tactic was “not merely an excess of zeal, but a blatant attempt to incriminate a suspect by positive and deceptive conduct of the grossest kind”.
Mr Stagg said that being charged with the murder had destroyed his life and, despite his acquittal, many people still believed that he was guilty.
He said: “I became a national hate figure. I had to endure every form of vilification. I was insulted, attacked, spat upon. My home was attacked and so was I. My name alone was enough to stop me getting work.”
Mr Stagg told ITV News yesterday: “There’s going to be a certain percentage of people who will always believe I’m guilty, no matter what.”
This year the Home Office announced that Mr Stagg was entitled to compensation. The amount will be decided by an independent review.
Mr Napper emerged as the prime suspect after police began a review of the case in 2002. The review team passed items of Miss Nickell’s clothing to forensic scientists, who identified microscopic DNA traces thought to belong to her killer. The traces had been missed during the original investigation. New techniques allowed the reviewing scientists to “grow” the material for more accurate analysis.
The Metropolitan Police sent a file on Mr Napper to the Crown Prosecution Service at the beginning of this year but the decision to charge him was delayed while lawyers tested the scientific evidence. Police and prosecutors were concerned to test the material fully because of the controversies about the forensic science evidence presented in the Damilola Taylor and Jill Dando murder trials.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Regarding Paul Brittain's book "The Jigsaw man",he said the same man who illed Jasmine Bisset could not have murdered Rachel Nickell.
He also mentioned Robert Napper in the Green Chain rapes in the same book!!
If he had looked at Robert Napper instead of Colin Stagg then maybe Rachel's murder could have been prevented.
w johnson, Lincs, uk
Why do we keep people like Robert Napper alive? Killing a young mum and her toddler daughter in this way is beyond sickening. Just put a bullet straight through his head - he's never going to be cured. Spend the thousands of pounds wasted on his care on child protection. There is no case for useful rehabilitation here.
Justine, London, uk
Mr Tilbury. The murder victim is only one victim in a case such as this. The innocent person who is jailed is also a victim of the law that should protect them. As long as it is possible to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" that someone committed a crime even when none has occured, the legal system will be a hit and miss affair enabling totally innocent people to be imprisoned.
Rob Price, Wimborne, Dorset
By coincidence, I have just finished reading The Jigsaw Man by Paul Britton, the psychologist used by the police to help profile the killer of Rachael Nickell and also another victim of Robert Napper and her young daughter.
Yes Colin Stagg was a victim of a 'honeytrap' but when reading the book you will discover that far from being a completely innocent member of the public, Colin Stagg held some extremely disturbing fantasies which were very similar to Rachaels murder involving the common and although he was shown a photo of the way her body was left, according to the book, he described details that only someone who had seen the body could know.
db, essex, uk
This is one of those cases where public opinion demands the pollice find the criminal. The police totally scewed up first time so who will have any faith in their 'evidence' this time?
Why are poeple who couldn't care less about other murder victims so concened with this one? Just because of the massive press coverage?
Roger Tilbury, Worthing,
With a result again such as this what makes us think that the correct evaluation, and suspect\s being charged at the end of the McCann (missing Maddie) case.
or in few years time the case being re-opened and supposed new evidence being upturned or turned over to accuse someone else, it all instills very little confidence in the law and legal system, especially in the larger cases or more serious crimes.
mike oakes, Jersey, Channel Islands
People have worked tirelessly in this case. May she finally be allowed her justice. 49 times she was stabbed. And quite how this suspect's first murders were never rasied as a high profile case by the media (a mother and her daughter, horrifically murdered in cold blood... I undertsand the details were too horrific for the the public to be fully informed about!) is a disgrace. I hope her son and family are well and get some 'closure'. Sadly this suspect will get no more than he has already been sentenced to. And who knows.... he may even be released in 30 years, by accident, to do it all over again!
Mr James, Sutton, Surrey
Yet another MET frame up craters. Punishing the innocent is not only a crime, it is also corruption. Pity some of the compensation can't be taken from senior police officers' pensions. Might make them a little more circumspect in the future.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan
Now will Mr Stagg get an official apology from the bumbling Met and hope he'll get a good payout for all his troubles from them.
cww, suffolk,
Wasn't Barry George. now serving life for the murder of Jill Dando, also a "prime suspect" in this case?
Ken Leyland, Liverpool, U.K.
Well, that didn`t take too long for the Met to confess they had the wrong man
How many years ago did they have doubts about Colin Stagg`s
guilt , while he languished in prison
It`s not just the government who are incompetent under thier leader.
John , plymouth, UK
I worked in the High Street where Colin Stagg was housed near by after the collapsed trial.The police were disgraceful in the way that they went in to all the shops,banks and building societies and told us that in the next few days he would be walking our local streets and that he had done it. Yes , you could say that they had our welfare at state but he was just an odd man in the wrong place.( near wimbledon) I can remember him being interviewed on the late shows with his then girlfriend and the poor man went through hell!
His life has been changed forever and I do think in the end he will now benefit from this ordeal ,but at a price!
I hope he can now sleep at night and know that justice has been served and that Mr Napper is never let out again to repeat his actions. The efforts the police went to to convict the wrong man might have caught the right man at lot earlier and Colin Stagg could have rebuilt his life 10 years earlier.
Rachel, Surrey, England
But I thought that when the poor
Colin Stagg was hounded the way that he was and aquitted, the Met were not looking for anyone else?
Pete Balchin, Solicitor , Bristol, UK
As the father of a two-year-old child at the time and a resident of South London I remember this case well.
The way Colin Stagg was hounded over this was visibly wrong, but the Met seemed to be responding to the tabloids in the worst possible way. The case seemed to hinge around him being an inadequate and a conviction for nude sunbathing. I also remember the outcry when Stagg, whose life had been wrecked, obtained compensation for the fit-up.
I wonder how many other wrong convictions the "fit-up" Met have achieved and whether their attitudes are any better now. I somehow doubt it.
Dave, slough,