One of Britain’s most senior policemen was urged to resign yesterday after he was banned from driving for six weeks and fined £300 for speeding.

Meredydd Hughes, 49, the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, was chairman of the Association of Chief Police Officers road safety committee when he was caught driving at 90mph in a 60mph zone. He has since stepped down from that post.

His sentence has been criticised as lenient by the antispeed charity Brake, which suggested that Hughes’s actions had undermined the work of his traffic colleagues to such an extent that he should consider his position.

Hughes, who has argued for less conspicuous speed cameras to catch speeding motorists, did not attend court in person but admitted the charge through his solicitor.

The court was told that he was driving to Shropshire on the A5 at Wrexham, North Wales, on a short climbing trip when he was caught travelling at 90mph in his Y-registration Audi.

The chief constable for the force is Richard Brunstrom, a notoriously zealous advocate for greater speed-camera enforcement.

Huw Edwards, Hughes’s solicitor, told Wrexham Magistrates’ Court: “He does not seek to make any excuse about this matter. He totally accepts that the police have a duty to do.

“He is no exception and he accepts that he must be punished for the offence. He asks me to apologise for the offence. He recognises that it is a serious matter.”

The court was told that Hughes had held a driving licence for 30 years and had received two fixed-penalty notices during that time, which had both expired.

After the brief hearing, Hughes issued a statement in which he apologised to colleagues on the North Wales force and the public.

He said he recognised that the offence was a significant breach of the law but suggested mitigating factors for travelling at such a high speed. He said that it was early in the morning, when traffic was minimal, and the weather and road surface conditions had been good.

But he added: “There is never an excuse for bad driving and I should have paid more attention to my speed. I remain convinced that safety cameras and speed enforcement are vital to reduce casualty levels and I will continue to support this activity.”

He added: “Drivers who know they are guilty should plead guilty rather than exploit process issues or other spurious attacks on technologies and I am quite proud to know I have lived up to that belief.”

Jools Townsend, head of education at Brake, criticised the chief constable’s actions and the sentence.

She said: “It is shocking that someone with Hughes’s experience of working to prevent road deaths and police our roads should drive in a way that endangers lives.

“Speeding is a reckless and selfish act, and the lenient sentence reflects a justice system which lacks the teeth to punish speeders appropriately.

“By committing this deadly crime, Hughes undermines the work of traffic police to protect the safety of road users, both within his force and across the country. He should seriously consider his position as a result.”

The court case has also been seized upon by opponents of Mr Brunstrom.

Paul Smith, founder of SafeSpeed.org.uk, said: “Speed enforcement has become a ridiculous obsession to the severe detriment of far more important aspects of road safety. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Mr Hughes should clearly have been preaching what he practises because clearly he knows that exceeding the speed limit is not necessarily dangerous.”

Times Recommends

• Tree stump 'shows image of Virgin Mary'
• BBC drops Strictly judge for younger model
• Trafalgar Square 'reduced to a spectacle'